Who Learns More? Cultural Differences in Implicit Sequence Learning

Background It is well documented that East Asians differ from Westerners in conscious perception and attention. However, few studies have explored cultural differences in unconscious processes such as implicit learning. Methodology/Principal Findings The global-local Navon letters were adopted in the serial reaction time (SRT) task, during which Chinese and British participants were instructed to respond to global or local letters, to investigate whether culture influences what people acquire in implicit sequence learning. Our results showed that from the beginning British expressed a greater local bias in perception than Chinese, confirming a cultural difference in perception. Further, over extended exposure, the Chinese learned the target regularity better than the British when the targets were global, indicating a global advantage for Chinese in implicit learning. Moreover, Chinese participants acquired greater unconscious knowledge of an irrelevant regularity than British participants, indicating that the Chinese were more sensitive to contextual regularities than the British. Conclusions/Significance The results suggest that cultural biases can profoundly influence both what people consciously perceive and unconsciously learn.

[1]  R. Nisbett,et al.  The influence of culture: holistic versus analytic perception , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Zoltan Dienes,et al.  Rapidly Measuring the Speed of Unconscious Learning: Amnesics Learn Quickly and Happy People Slowly , 2012, PloS one.

[3]  B. W. Whittlesea,et al.  Incidentally, things in general are particularly determined: An episodic-processing account of implicit learning , 1993 .

[4]  U. Mayr,et al.  Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  Local–global processing in early-onset schizophrenia: Evidence for an impairment in shifting the spatial scale of attention , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[6]  Luis Jiménez Intention, attention, and consciousness in probabilistic sequence learning , 2003 .

[7]  Patrick Rebuschat,et al.  Implicit learning of word order , 2009 .

[8]  E. Bernat,et al.  Unconscious perception: A model-based approach to method and evidence , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  Elisabeth Norman,et al.  Gradations of awareness in a modified sequence learning task , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[10]  Z. Dienes,et al.  The conscious, the unconscious, and familiarity. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  On the development of procedural knowledge. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Peder J. Johnson,et al.  Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure. , 1994 .

[13]  Leonora Wilkinson,et al.  Intentional control and implicit sequence learning. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Neural Substrates of Response-based Sequence Learning using fMRI , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Z. Diénès Understanding Psychology as a Science: An Introduction to Scientific and Statistical Inference , 2008 .

[16]  Z. Dienes,et al.  The distinction between intuition and guessing in the SRT task generation: A reply to Norman and Price , 2010, Consciousness and Cognition.

[17]  Luis Jiménez,et al.  Temporal effects in sequence learning , 2003 .

[18]  R. Hassin,et al.  Short Article: Goal relevance and artificial grammar learning , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  Dianne C. Berry,et al.  Negative priming and sequence learning , 2002 .

[20]  William Revelle,et al.  Who Sees Trees Before Forest? , 2005, Psychological science.

[21]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Computational Models of Implicit Learning , 2019, Implicit Learning.

[22]  D. Oyserman,et al.  Thinking about the self influences thinking in general: cognitive consequences of salient self-concept , 2002 .

[23]  Richard E. Nisbett,et al.  Culture and Change Blindness , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[24]  Zhicheng Lin,et al.  Self-construal priming modulates the scope of visual attention , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  Carol A. Seger,et al.  Implicit learning. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  D. Navon Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  Zoltán Dienes,et al.  Cross cultural differences in unconscious knowledge , 2012, Cognition.

[28]  R. Nisbett,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Attending Holistically Versus Analytically: Comparing the Context Sensitivity of Japanese and Americans , 2004 .

[29]  Z. Dienes,et al.  Measuring unconscious knowledge: distinguishing structural knowledge and judgment knowledge , 2005, Psychological research.

[30]  J Hoffmann,et al.  Irrelevant response effects improve serial learning in serial reaction time tasks. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  Kazuo Shigemasu,et al.  Role of selective attention in artificial grammar learning , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[32]  Carol A. Seger,et al.  Independent Judgment-Linked and Motor-Linked Forms of Artificial Grammar Learning , 1998, Consciousness and Cognition.

[33]  Zoltan Dienes,et al.  Conscious versus unconscious learning of structure , 2012 .

[34]  Luis Jiménez,et al.  Which Attention Is Needed for Implicit Sequence Learning , 1999 .

[35]  Ágnes Lukács,et al.  Self-Insight in Probabilistic Category Learning , 2013, The Journal of general psychology.

[36]  Zhicheng Lin,et al.  Self-construal priming modulates visual activity underlying global/local perception , 2008, Biological Psychology.

[37]  Lei Zhu,et al.  Implicit learning of mappings between forms and metaphorical meanings , 2013, Consciousness and Cognition.

[38]  S. Kaufman,et al.  Intact implicit learning in autism spectrum conditions , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[39]  A. Reber Implicit learning and tacit knowledge , 1993 .

[40]  Lei Zhu,et al.  Unconscious structural knowledge of tonal symmetry: Tang poetry redefines limits of implicit learning , 2012, Consciousness and Cognition.

[41]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Is it culture or is it language? Examination of language effects in cross-cultural research on categorization. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. , 2001, Psychological review.

[43]  N. Mackintosh,et al.  Psychometric intelligence dissociates implicit and explicit learning. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[44]  Xiaolan Fu,et al.  Implicit sequence learning and conscious awareness , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[45]  Dianne C. Berry,et al.  Implicit Learning , 1993 .

[46]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[47]  Z. Dienes,et al.  Intentional control based on familiarity in artificial grammar learning , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[48]  T. Goschke,et al.  Implicit learning of semantic category sequences: response-independent acquisition of abstract sequential regularities. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[49]  R. Kimchi Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: a critical review. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[50]  Philip A. Gable,et al.  The Blues Broaden, but the Nasty Narrows , 2010, Psychological science.

[51]  Xiaolan Fu,et al.  Can unconscious knowledge allow control in sequence learning? , 2010, Consciousness and Cognition.

[52]  J. Davidoff,et al.  Local and global processing: Observations from a remote culture , 2008, Cognition.

[53]  Ferenc Kemény,et al.  Perceptual Effect on Motor Learning in the Serial Reaction-Time Task , 2011, The Journal of general psychology.

[54]  R. Nisbett The geography of thought : how Asians and Westerners think differently--and why , 2003 .

[55]  H Stanislaw,et al.  Calculation of signal detection theory measures , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[56]  Z. Dienes Bayesian Versus Orthodox Statistics: Which Side Are You On? , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[57]  Zoltan Dienes,et al.  Fluency does not express implicit knowledge of artificial grammars , 2010, Cognition.

[58]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  Implicit motor sequence learning is represented in response locations , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[59]  H. Zimmer,et al.  The influence of expertise and of physical complexity on visual short-term memory consolidation , 2011, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.

[60]  D. Shanks,et al.  Attention modulates the learning of multiple contingencies , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[61]  A. Vinter,et al.  The self-organizing consciousness. , 2002, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[62]  David R. Shanks,et al.  A unitary signal-detection model of implicit and explicit memory , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[63]  Michael Ziessler,et al.  Response-effect learning as a major component of implicit serial learning , 1998 .

[64]  Karolina Janacsek,et al.  Interference between Sentence Processing and Probabilistic Implicit Sequence Learning , 2011, PloS one.

[65]  G. Remillard Pure perceptual-based sequence learning. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[66]  Esther van den Bos,et al.  Structural selection in implicit learning of artificial grammars , 2009, Psychological research.

[67]  Jeff T. Larsen,et al.  Perceiving an Object and Its Context in Different Cultures , 2003, Psychological science.

[68]  Xiaolan Fu,et al.  Negative Affect Reduces Performance in Implicit Sequence Learning , 2013, PloS one.

[69]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Parallel and competitive processes in hierarchical analysis: perceptual grouping and encoding of closure. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[70]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Implicit learning: news from the front , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.