Practical limits on muscle synergy identification by non-negative matrix factorization in systems with mechanical constraints

Statistical decomposition, including non-negative matrix factorization (NMF), is a convenient tool for identifying patterns of structured variability within behavioral motor programs, but it is unclear how the resolved factors relate to actual neural structures. Factors can be extracted from a uniformly sampled, low-dimension command space. In practical application, the command space is limited, either to those activations that perform some task(s) successfully or to activations induced in response to specific perturbations. NMF was applied to muscle activation patterns synthesized from low dimensional, synergy-like control modules mimicking simple task performance or feedback activation from proprioceptive signals. In the task-constrained paradigm, the accuracy of control module recovery was highly dependent on the sampled volume of control space, such that sampling even 50 % of control space produced a substantial degradation in factor accuracy. In the feedback paradigm, NMF was not capable of extracting more than four control modules, even in a mechanical model with seven internal degrees of freedom. Reduced access to the low-dimensional control space imposed by physical constraints may result in substantial distortion of an existing low dimensional controller, such that neither the dimensionality nor the composition of the recovered/extracted factors match the original controller.

[1]  Anthony Jarc,et al.  Simplified and effective motor control based on muscle synergies to exploit musculoskeletal dynamics , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Richard R Neptune,et al.  Merging of healthy motor modules predicts reduced locomotor performance and muscle coordination complexity post-stroke. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The construction of movement by the spinal cord , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  Emilio Bizzi,et al.  Shared and specific muscle synergies in natural motor behaviors. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Nathan E. Bunderson,et al.  Reduction of neuromuscular redundancy for postural force generation using an intrinsic stability criterion. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Modulation and vectorial summation of the spinalized frog's hindlimb end-point force produced by intraspinal electrical stimulation of the cord , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Muscle synergies encoded within the spinal cord: evidence from focal intraspinal NMDA iontophoresis in the frog. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Lena H Ting,et al.  A limited set of muscle synergies for force control during a postural task. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Andrea d'Avella,et al.  Matrix factorization algorithms for the identification of muscle synergies: evaluation on simulated and experimental data sets. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization , 1999, Nature.

[11]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  Algorithms for Non-negative Matrix Factorization , 2000, NIPS.

[12]  T Richard Nichols,et al.  Three‐dimensional model of the feline hindlimb , 2004, Journal of morphology.

[13]  R E Poppele,et al.  Broad directional tuning in spinal projections to the cerebellum. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Victoria Stodden,et al.  When Does Non-Negative Matrix Factorization Give a Correct Decomposition into Parts? , 2003, NIPS.

[15]  J. Houk,et al.  Dependence of dynamic response of spindle receptors on muscle length and velocity. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Emilio Bizzi,et al.  Combinations of muscle synergies in the construction of a natural motor behavior , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  F. A. Mussa-lvaldi,et al.  Convergent force fields organized in the frog's spinal cord , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  Patrik O. Hoyer,et al.  Non-negative Matrix Factorization with Sparseness Constraints , 2004, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[19]  Nathan E. Bunderson,et al.  Directional constraint of endpoint force emerges from hindlimb anatomy , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[20]  Lena H Ting,et al.  Neuromechanics of muscle synergies for posture and movement , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[21]  Keith W van Antwerp,et al.  Inter-joint coupling effects on muscle contributions to endpoint force and acceleration in a musculoskeletal model of the cat hindlimb. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  E. Todorov Optimality principles in sensorimotor control , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  M. Lemay,et al.  Modularity of motor output evoked by intraspinal microstimulation in cats. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Emanuel Todorov,et al.  Structured variability of muscle activations supports the minimal intervention principle of motor control. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  Francisco J. Valero Cuevas,et al.  Challenges and New Approaches to Proving the Existence of Muscle Synergies of Neural Origin , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..