Measuring shoplifting by systematic observation: A replication study
暂无分享,去创建一个
Abstract A random sample of customers entering a small department store in Bedford were systematically observed from when they entered the store until when they left it. The results were compared with those obtained in a similar study in Peterborough. Nine out of 486 customers (1.9%) were observed to shoplift in Peterborough, and six out of 502 (1.2%) in Bedford. Males were more likely to shoplift than females. Most shoplifters purchased goods, possibly to allay suspicion. Generally, shoplifters stole small, low-cost items and looked around carefully to check that nobody was watching them before placing the items in pockets or bags. It is concluded that a great deal can be learned about offending through direct, systematic observation.
[1] JoAnn Ray,et al. Economic Motivators for Shoplifting , 1988, The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare.
[2] JoAnn Ray,et al. Every Twelfth Shopper: Who Shoplifts and Why? , 1987 .
[3] Gregory R. Schlueter,et al. Rational vs. Nonrational Shoplifting Types; The Implications for Loss Prevention Strategies , 1989 .
[4] D. Farrington,et al. AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF SHOPLIFTING , 1984 .