Food-web topology of Ukrainian mountain grasslands: Comparative properties and relations to ecosystem parameters

Abstract An important question in ecology is whether the food-web structure and ecosystem functions are related. This paper provide an empirical evidence for the food-web complexity–ecosystem properties relationships using the comparative analysis of food webs in seven mountain pastoral grasslands located in the Carpathian Mountain area of the Chernivtsi Region, Ukraine. Biomass of plant functional groups; grazing intensity; richness of different functional groups of the soil microorganisms; and geographical location of the study grasslands are observed ecosystem properties. Trophic networks consisting of N food and feeding categories (nodes, compartments) joined by L food transfers (links) were constructed for each studied pasture and the following network measures of their graph characteristics (“topology”) determined: food-web size ( N ), number of links ( L ), link density ( LD  =  L / N ), and connectance ( C  =  L / N 2 ). Also the number of trophic classes and size of each trophic class are incorporated as the properties of the food-web architecture. Our data reveal that increase in species richness and food-web complexity increases the biomass of forbs within the study grasslands. Grazing intensity shows negative but statistically insignificant correlation with network measures. Our findings also reveal the longitudinal changes in connectance variation across the study food webs. It shows that temperature and elevation changes may also contribute toward the food-web connectance variation within the study area. Overall, our findings report plants to be the defining in network architecture. Furthermore grazing-susceptible plants show to be the driving variable in a food-web structure of the study grasslands. Our findings also reveal new aspects in behavioral patterns of food-web properties in relation to each other. Our data report link density to be the most sensitive parameter in relation to the other food-web measures. In contrast, connectance shows the least sensitivity to all other network measures, but the most sensitivity to the observed ecosystem parameters.

[1]  L F Bersier,et al.  Scaling regions for food web properties. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Bradford A. Hawkins,et al.  EFFECTS OF SAMPLING EFFORT ON CHARACTERIZATION OF FOOD-WEB STRUCTURE , 1999 .

[3]  K. Winemiller Spatial and Temporal Variation in Tropical Fish Trophic Networks , 1990 .

[4]  G. Sugihara,et al.  Scale invariance in food web properties. , 1989, Science.

[5]  W. Voigt,et al.  Using functional groups to investigate community response to environmental changes: two grassland case studies , 2007 .

[6]  E. Odum Fundamentals of ecology , 1972 .

[7]  Neo D. Martinez Artifacts or Attributes? Effects of Resolution on the Little Rock Lake Food Web , 1991 .

[8]  R. Macarthur Fluctuations of Animal Populations and a Measure of Community Stability , 1955 .

[9]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Source food webs as estimators of community web structure , 1997 .

[10]  F. Briand,et al.  Environmental Control of Food Web Structure , 1983 .

[11]  C. Fonseca,et al.  Connectance : a role for community allometry , 1996 .

[12]  Bernard C. Patten,et al.  Dynamical and system-wide properties of linear flow-quantified food webs , 2012 .

[13]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Food-web structure and network theory: The role of connectance and size , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Network structure and biodiversity loss in food webs: robustness increases with connectance , 2002, Ecology Letters.

[15]  H. Kaiser The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis , 1960 .

[16]  Owen L Petchey,et al.  Predicting the effects of temperature on food web connectance , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  How do complex food webs persist in nature , 2005 .

[18]  S. Borgatti,et al.  Defining and measuring trophic role similarity in food webs using regular equivalence. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[19]  S. Jørgensen Integration of Ecosystem Theories: A Pattern , 1994, Ecology & Environment.

[20]  Bernard C. Patten,et al.  Trophic Network Analysis: Comparison of System-Wide Properties , 2012 .

[21]  Bernard C. Patten,et al.  Network integration of ecological extremal principles: exergy, emergy, power, ascendency, and indirect effects , 1995 .

[22]  MARK R. GARDNER,et al.  Connectance of Large Dynamic (Cybernetic) Systems: Critical Values for Stability , 1970, Nature.

[23]  Lin Jiang,et al.  Different Effects of Species Diversity on Temporal Stability in Single‐Trophic and Multitrophic Communities , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[24]  K. McCann The diversity–stability debate , 2000, Nature.

[25]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  Two algorithms for computing regular equivalence , 1993 .

[26]  Lael Parrott,et al.  Examining the potential effects of species aggregation on the network structure of food webs , 2007, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[27]  Jason S. Link,et al.  Does food web theory work for marine ecosystems , 2002 .

[28]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Pajek - Program for Large Network Analysis , 1999 .

[29]  J. E. Cohen,et al.  Trophic links of community food webs. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Michael J. O. Pocock,et al.  Connectance of species interaction networks and conservation value: Is it any good to be well connected? , 2012 .

[31]  B. C. Patten,et al.  Complementarity of ecological goal functions. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[32]  Neo D. Martinez Constant Connectance in Community Food Webs , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[33]  Diego Garlaschelli,et al.  Universality in food webs , 2004 .

[34]  Michael Rzanny,et al.  Complexity of multitrophic interactions in a grassland ecosystem depends on plant species diversity. , 2012, The Journal of animal ecology.

[35]  K. Havens,et al.  Scale and Structure in Natural Food Webs , 1992, Science.

[36]  Jean-Pierre Gabriel,et al.  Complexity in quantitative food webs. , 2009, Ecology.

[37]  S. Pimm,et al.  The structure of food webs. , 1979, Theoretical population biology.

[38]  Debal Deb,et al.  Scale-dependence of food web structures: tropical ponds as paradigm , 1995 .

[39]  Louis-Félix Bersier,et al.  QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTORS OF FOOD-WEB MATRICES , 2002 .

[40]  Jennifer A Dunne,et al.  Major dimensions in food-web structure properties. , 2009, Ecology.

[41]  ROBERT M. MAY,et al.  Will a Large Complex System be Stable? , 1972, Nature.

[42]  D. L. Angelis,et al.  STABILITY AND CONNECTANCE IN FOOD WEB MODELS , 1975 .

[43]  P. Yodzis,et al.  The connectance of real ecosystems , 1980, Nature.

[44]  Charles C. Elton,et al.  The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. , 1959 .

[45]  P. Warren Making connections in food webs. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[46]  R. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[47]  Joel E. Cohen,et al.  Food web patterns and their consequences , 1991, Nature.

[48]  Joel E. Cohen,et al.  Community Food Webs: Data and Theory , 1990 .