Effect of glare angle on the brightness function for a small target.

Abstract The effect of a small, intense glare source (118 dB) on the brightness of a small target was measured as a function of glare angle and target luminance. Using an interocular matching procedure the observer adjusted the brightness of a match field (seen by the right eye) to equal the depressed brightness of the target under the influence of the glare (seen by the left eye). Glare angle was varied from 13.2 to 274 min. Target luminance was varied from 58 to 93 dB relative to 10 −10 Lambert. For all target luminances, the apparent brightness of the target was shown to be directly related to the logarithm of the glare angle. At a given glare angle the brightness grows as a power function of the luminance, and the exponent of the power function is largest when the glare angle is smallest. In double logarithmic coordinates the functions relating the luminance of the match field to that of an equally bright target become straight lines that converge at a common point, equal to the luminance of the glare (118 dB).

[1]  S S Stevens,et al.  To Honor Fechner and Repeal His Law: A power function, not a log function, describes the operating characteristic of a sensory system. , 1961, Science.

[2]  Diamond Al.  Foveal simultaneous contrast as a function of inducing-field area. , 1955 .

[3]  S S Stevens,et al.  Relation of brightness to duration and luminance under light- and dark-adaptation. , 1964, Vision research.

[4]  H. Leibowitz,et al.  The effect of separation between test and inducing fields on brightness constancy. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  S. S. Stevens.  Calculation of the Loudness of Complex Noise , 1956 .

[6]  L. Ornstein,et al.  Measurements on Direct and Indirect Adaptation by Means of a Binocular Method , 1939 .

[7]  J. W. Onley.  Light adaptation and the brightness of brief foveal stimuli. , 1961, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[8]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Brightness function: effects of adaptation. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[9]  Diamond Al,et al.  A theory of depression and enhancement in the brightness response. , 1960 .

[10]  S. S. Stevens.  On the psychophysical law. , 1957, Psychological review.

[11]  G. Brink.  Subjective brightness during dark-adaptation , 1962 .

[12]  A. L. Diamond,et al.  Foveal simultaneous brightness contrast as a function of inducing-and test-field luminances. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  S. S. Stevens.  On the brightness of lights and loudness of sounds , 1953 .

[14]  H W Horeman,et al.  Relations between brightness and luminance under induction. , 1965, Vision research.

[15]  D. Jameson,et al.  Complexities of perceived brightness. , 1961, Science.

[16]  M. Alpern,et al.  The effect of a peripheral glare source upon the apparent brightness of an object. , 1953, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[17]  G. Yonemura.  Luminance threshold as a function of angular distance from an inducing source. , 1962, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[18]  RELATION OF BRIGHTNESS CONTRAST TO INDUCING STIMULUS OUTPUT. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[19]  S. H. Bartley,et al.  Measurements of Simultaneous Brightness Contrast Across the Retina , 1961 .

[20]  S. S. Stevens.  The surprising simplicity of sensory metrics. , 1962 .

[21]  Diamond Al.  Simultaneous contrast as a function of test-field area. , 1962 .

[22]  H. Leibowitz,et al.  Simultaneous contrast as a function of separation between test and inducing fields. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.