Flash co-pyrolysis of biomass: The influence of biopolymers

Abstract A high water content is one of the major drawbacks for the utilisation of bio-oil. One technology which shows the potential to satisfy the demand for bio-oil with a reduced water content is the flash co-pyrolysis of biomass with biopolymers. The influence of biopolymers on the pyrolysis yield of a biomass waste stream is investigated with a semi-continuous home-built pyrolysis reactor. Polylactic acid (PLA), corn starch, polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB), Biopearls, Eastar, Solanyl and potato starch are the biopolymers under investigation. All biopolymers show their specific benefits during flash co-pyrolysis with willow (target biomass) at 723 K. Each (co-)pyrolysis of pure willow (reference) and all 1:1 (w/w) ratio willow/biopolymer blends is evaluated based on five predefined criteria. A multi-criteria decision aid (MCDA) method ‘PROMETHEE’ is used in order to obtain an objective ranking of the different biopolymer options. The flash co-pyrolysis of biomass and biopolymers results in improved pyrolysis characteristics. The flash co-pyrolysis of 1:1 willow/PHB is the most performant option, while 1:1 willow/PLA, 1:1 willow/Biopearls and 1:1 willow/potato starch show increased potential as well. The fact that biopolymers, despite their biodegradability, should be considered as waste, further increases the appealing features of the flash co-pyrolysis of biomass and biopolymers.

[1]  A. Bridgwater,et al.  Fast pyrolysis processes for biomass , 2000 .

[2]  D. Mohan,et al.  Pyrolysis of Wood/Biomass for Bio-oil: A Critical Review , 2006 .

[3]  B. Babu,et al.  Modeling, simulation and estimation of optimum parameters in pyrolysis of biomass , 2003 .

[4]  J. Vangronsveld,et al.  Study of the potential valorisation of heavy metal contaminated biomass via phytoremediation by fast pyrolysis: Part I. Influence of temperature, biomass species and solid heat carrier on the behaviour of heavy metals , 2008 .

[5]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS: THE PROMETHEE METHOD , 1986 .

[6]  P. Vincke,et al.  Note-A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making , 1985 .

[7]  T. Cornelissen,et al.  Flash co-pyrolysis of biomass with polylactic acid. Part 1: Influence on bio-oil yield and heating value , 2008 .

[8]  D. Meier,et al.  Norms and Standards for Pyrolysis Liquids. End-User Requirements and Specifications , 2005 .

[9]  Anthony V. Bridgwater,et al.  Fast pyrolysis of biomass : a handbook , 1999 .

[10]  T. Cornelissen,et al.  Flash co-pyrolysis of biomass with polyhydroxybutyrate: Part 1. Influence on bio-oil yield, water content, heating value and the production of chemicals , 2008 .

[11]  Ö. Onay,et al.  Slow, fast and flash pyrolysis of rapeseed , 2003 .

[12]  T. Cornelissen,et al.  Study of the potential valorisation of heavy metal contaminated biomass via phytoremediation by fast pyrolysis: Part II: Characterisation of the liquid and gaseous fraction as a function of the temperature , 2008 .

[13]  T. Bastow,et al.  Investigations into the control of odour and viscosity of biomass oil derived from pyrolysis of sewage sludge , 2005 .

[14]  A. Demirbas,et al.  An Overview of Biomass Pyrolysis , 2002 .

[15]  R. Bayard,et al.  Aerobic and anaerobic biodegradability of polymer films and physico-chemical characterization , 2006 .