Systematic analysis on the relationship between luminal enhancement, convolution kernel, plaque density, and luminal diameter of coronary artery stenosis: a CT phantom study
暂无分享,去创建一个
Hatem Alkadhi | Lotus Desbiolles | Paul Stolzmann | Sebastian Leschka | Fabian Morsbach | H. Alkadhi | S. Leschka | P. Stolzmann | N. Berger | L. Desbiolles | F. Morsbach | Nicole Berger | Tadea Poropat | T. Poropat
[1] S. Achenbach,et al. Noninvasive assessment of plaque morphology and composition in culprit and stable lesions in acute coronary syndrome and stable lesions in stable angina by multidetector computed tomography. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[2] Filippo Cademartiri,et al. Influence of convolution filtering on coronary plaque attenuation values: observations in an ex vivo model of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography , 2007, European Radiology.
[3] U. Schoepf,et al. Incremental prognostic value of different components of coronary atherosclerotic plaque at cardiac CT angiography beyond coronary calcification in patients with acute chest pain. , 2012, Radiology.
[4] Oliver Gaemperli,et al. Abstract 3413: Prognostic Value of Multi-slice Computed Tomography and Gated Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography in a Cohort of 426 Patients with Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease , 2007 .
[5] Filippo Cademartiri,et al. Higher intracoronary attenuation improves diagnostic accuracy in MDCT coronary angiography. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[6] Yun Shen,et al. Radiation dose, image quality, stenosis measurement, and CT densitometry using ECG-triggered coronary 64-MDCT angiography: a phantom study. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[7] Jeroen J. Bax,et al. Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[8] J. Min,et al. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.
[9] C. Fink,et al. Evaluation of heavily calcified vessels with coronary CT angiography: comparison of iterative and filtered back projection image reconstruction. , 2011, Radiology.
[10] J. Jung,et al. Coronary CT angiography in patients with high calcium score: evaluation of plaque characteristics and diagnostic accuracy , 2011, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.
[11] H. Scheffel,et al. Complementary value of cardiac FDG PET and CT for the characterization of atherosclerotic disease. , 2011, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
[12] Filippo Cademartiri,et al. Influence of intracoronary attenuation on coronary plaque measurements using multislice computed tomography: observations in an ex vivo model of coronary computed tomography angiography , 2005, European Radiology.
[13] Konstantin Nikolaou,et al. Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a comparative study with intracoronary ultrasound. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[14] Filippo Cademartiri,et al. Influence of increasing convolution kernel filtering on plaque imaging with multislice CT using an ex-vivo model of coronary angiography. , 2005, La Radiologia medica.
[15] S. Furui,et al. Measurement of vascular diameter in vitro by automated software for CT angiography: effects of inner diameter, density of contrast medium, and convolution kernel. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[16] Rainer Raupach,et al. 64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents , 2006, European Radiology.
[17] J. R. Landis,et al. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.
[18] R. Bauer,et al. Noncalcified atherosclerotic plaque burden at coronary CT angiography: a better predictor of ischemia at stress myocardial perfusion imaging than calcium score and stenosis severity. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[19] S. Achenbach,et al. Influence of slice thickness and reconstruction kernel on the computed tomographic attenuation of coronary atherosclerotic plaque. , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.
[20] R. Günther,et al. 64-slice computed tomography assessment of coronary artery stents: a phantom study , 2006, Acta radiologica.
[21] H. Alkadhi,et al. Accuracy of quantitative coronary angiography with computed tomography and its dependency on plaque composition , 2008, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.
[22] W. Kalender,et al. Assessment of calcium scoring performance in cardiac computed tomography , 2003, European Radiology.
[23] S. Achenbach,et al. Quantification of coronary stenosis by dual source computed tomography in patients: a comparative study with intravascular ultrasound and invasive angiography. , 2012, European journal of radiology.
[24] S. Abbara. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography , 2011 .