Assessing socioeconomic status in adolescents: the validity of a home affluence scale

Study objective: To examine the completion rate, internal reliability, and external validity of a home affluence scale based on adolescents' reports of material circumstances in the home as a measure of family socioeconomic status. Design: Cross sectional survey. Setting: Data were collected from a school based study in seven schools in the north of England Cheshire over a five month period from September 1999 to January 2000. Participants: 1824 students (1248 girls, 567 boys) aged 13–15 years who were attending normal classes in Years 9 and 10 in 7 schools on the days of data collection. Main results: Comparatively poor completion rates were found for questions on parental education and occupation while material deprivation items had much higher completion rates. There was evidence that students with poorer material circumstances were less able to report parental education and occupation whereas material based questions showed less bias. A home affluence scale composed of material items was found to have adequate internal reliability and good external validity. Conclusions: A home affluence scale based on material markers provides a useful alternative in assessing family affluence in adolescents. Additionally, it prevents exclusion of those less materially well off adolescents who fail to complete conventional socioeconomic status items.

[1]  R. Gofin,et al.  Indicators of social class. A comparative appraisal of measures for use in epidemiological studies. , 1982, Social science & medicine.

[2]  E. Goodman.  The role of socioeconomic status gradients in explaining differences in US adolescents' health. , 1999, American journal of public health.

[3]  N. Lien,et al.  Adolescents' proxy reports of parents' socioeconomic status: How valid are they? , 2001, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[4]  J. Danesh,et al.  Postcodes as useful markers of social class: population based study in 26 000 British households. , 1999, BMJ.

[5]  J. Groothoff,et al.  Socio-economic differences in health risk behavior in adolescence: do they exist? , 1998, Social science & medicine.

[6]  J L Kelsey,et al.  The measurement of social class in epidemiology. , 1988, Epidemiologic reviews.

[7]  P. Townsend,et al.  Health and Deprivation: Inequality and the North , 1987 .

[8]  D. Black.  HEALTH AND DEPRIVATION: Inequality and the north , 1988 .

[9]  D. C. Howell.  Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[10]  Surveys.,et al.  Standard occupational classification , 1990 .

[11]  A. Ellaway,et al.  Postcodes don't indicate individuals' social class , 1999, BMJ.

[12]  D. Trichopoulos,et al.  Adolescents in high-risk trajectory: clustering of risky behavior and the origins of socioeconomic health differentials. , 1997, Preventive medicine.

[13]  C. Hertzman,et al.  Socioeconomic status and cardiovascular risk factors in the Czech Republic. , 1999, International journal of epidemiology.

[14]  P. West,et al.  We Really Do Know What You Do: A Comparison of Reports from 11 Year Olds and their Parents in Respect of Parental Economic Activity and Occupation: , 2001 .

[15]  D. Baker,et al.  The relationship between condition-specific morbidity, social support and material deprivation in pregnancy and early motherhood. ALSPAC Survey Team. Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood. , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[16]  C. Currie,et al.  Indicators of socioeconomic status for adolescents: the WHO Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Survey. , 1997, Health education research.