We present an alternative expectation formation mechanism that helps rationalize well known asset pricing anomalies, such as the predictability of excess returns, excess volatility, and the equity-premium puzzle. As with rational expectations (RE), the expectation formation mechanism we consider is based on a rigorous optimization algorithm that does not presume misperceptions - it simply departs from some of the implicit assumptions that underlie RE. Agents fear that existence of misspecifications and design strategies that will be robust against a very large class of misspecifications. The new element is that uncertainty cannot be modeled via probability distributions. We consider an asset pricing model where uncertainty is represented by unknown disturbance sequences, as in the H-infinity-control literature. Agents must filter the persistent' and transitory' components of a sequence of observations in order to make consumption and portfolio decisions. We find that H-infinity forecasts are more sensitive to news than RE forecasts and equilibrium prices exhibit the anomalies previously mentioned.
[1]
Alexei Onatski,et al.
ROBUST MONETARY POLICY UNDER MODEL UNCERTAINTY IN A SMALL MODEL OF THE U.S. ECONOMY
,
1998,
Macroeconomic Dynamics.
[2]
Deborah Lucas,et al.
Evaluating the Effects of Incomplete Markets on Risk Sharing and Asset Pricing
,
1993,
Journal of Political Economy.
[3]
Kent D. Daniel,et al.
Presentation Slides for 'Investor Psychology and Security Market Under and Overreactions'
,
1998
.
[4]
E. Fama,et al.
Dividend yields and expected stock returns
,
1988
.
[5]
R. Lucas.
ASSET PRICES IN AN EXCHANGE ECONOMY
,
1978
.
[6]
Prospect Theory and Asset Prices
,
1999
.
[7]
Stephen G. Cecchetti,et al.
Asset Pricing with Distorted Beliefs: Are Equity Returns Too Good to Be True?
,
1998
.
[8]
T. Sargent,et al.
Robust Permanent Income and Pricing
,
1999
.
[9]
R. Mehra,et al.
THE EQUITY PREMIUM A Puzzle
,
1985
.