Fitting Characteristics of Eighteen N95 Filtering-Facepiece Respirators

Four performance measures were used to evaluate the fitting characteristics of 18 models of N95 filtering-facepiece respirators: (1) the 5th percentile simulated workplace protection factor (SWPF) value, (2) the shift average SWPF value, (3) the h-value, and (4) the assignment error. The effect of fit-testing on the level of protection provided by the respirators was also evaluated. The respirators were tested on a panel of 25 subjects with various face sizes. Simulated workplace protection factor values, determined from six total penetration (face-seal leakage plus filter penetration) tests with re-donning between each test, were used to indicate respirator performance. Five fit-tests were used: Bitrex™, saccharin, generated aerosol corrected for filter penetration, PortaCount® Plus corrected for filter penetration, and the PortaCount Plus with the N95-Companion™ accessory. Without fit-testing, the 5th percentile SWPF for all models combined was 2.9 with individual model values ranging from 1.3 to 48.0. Passing a fit-test generally resulted in an increase in protection. In addition, the h-value of each respirator was computed. The h-value has been determined to be the population fraction of individuals who will obtain an adequate level of protection (i.e., SWPF ≥ 10, which is the expected level of protection for half-facepiece respirators) when a respirator is selected and donned (including a user seal check) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions without fit-testing. The h-value for all models combined was 0.74 (i.e., 74% of all donnings resulted in an adequate level of protection), with individual model h-values ranging from 0.31 to 0.99. Only three models had h-values above 0.95. Higher SWPF values were achieved by excluding SWPF values determined for test subject/respirator combinations that failed a fit-test. The improvement was greatest for respirator models with lower h-values. Using the concepts of shift average and assignment error to measure respirator performance yielded similar results. The highest level of protection was provided by passing a fit-test with a respirator having good fitting characteristics.

[1]  D L Campbell,et al.  Simulated workplace performance of N95 respirators. , 1999, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[2]  D L Campbell,et al.  Assigned protection factors for two respirator types based upon workplace performance testing. , 1984, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[3]  Larry Janssen,et al.  Comparison of five methods for fit-testing N95 filtering-facepiece respirators. , 2003, Applied occupational and environmental hygiene.

[4]  D L Campbell,et al.  Comparison of six respirator fit-test methods with an actual measurement of exposure in a simulated health care environment: Part II--Method comparison testing. , 1998, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[5]  E. C. Hyatt,et al.  Selection of respirator test panels representative of U.S. adult facial sizes , 1973 .

[6]  Ziqing Zhuang,et al.  193. Two New Approaches for Developing Respirator Fittest Panels Representative of U.S. Workers , 2002 .

[7]  R T McKay,et al.  Capability of respirator wearers to detect aerosolized qualitative fit test agents (sweetener and Bitrex) with known fixed leaks. , 2000, Applied occupational and environmental hygiene.

[8]  M. Key.  National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; occupational exposure to inorganic lead: request for comments and information; republication--NIOSH. Request for comments and information relevant to occupational exposure to inorganic lead. , 1997, Federal register.

[9]  D L Campbell,et al.  Respiratory protection as a function of respirator fitting characteristics and fit-test accuracy. , 2001, AIHAJ : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety.

[10]  Nancy J. Bollinger,et al.  Niosh Guide To Industrial Respiratory Protection , 1987 .

[11]  Laboratory performance evaluation of N95 filtering facepiece respirators, 1996. , 1998, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.