Bilateral cochlear implants: a way to optimize auditory perception abilities in deaf children?

OBJECTIVES The Würzburg bilateral cochlear implant (CI) program was started with the aim to improve the patients' communicative abilities in complex listening situations. In this study, the auditory skills of children using bilateral cochlear implants were evaluated. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTINGS Qualitative data based on free observations in the rehabilitation setup were collected in 39 bilaterally implanted children. A speech discrimination in noise test was performed in 18 of these children; lists of bisyllabic words were presented in noise at a signal to noise ratio (SNR) of +15 dB. RESULTS Qualitative and quantitative data show clearly that bilateral CI improves the children's communicative behaviour, especially in complex listening situations. Children examined with the speech in noise test scored significantly better under the bilateral condition compared to the unilateral condition. Integration of the second implanted side and use of binaural information was observed to be easier and faster in children with a short time lag between both implants. CONCLUSIONS To be able to obtain optimal benefit from bilateral cochlear implants, an intensive rehabilitation program is necessary. The important aspects of such a program are creating realistic expectations in older children before implantation; performing the first processor fitting of the second side with the first side switched on; and separate intensive training with the new system in order to balance out the hearing competence of the second CI with that of the first.

[1]  B. Reimer,et al.  Results of cochlear implantation in patients with severe to profound hearing loss--implications for patient selection. , 1998, Audiology.

[2]  Rainer Hartmann,et al.  Delayed Maturation and Sensitive Periods in the Auditory Cortex , 2001, Audiology and Neurotology.

[3]  S. Bornstein Time compression and release from masking in adults and children. , 1994, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[4]  A. Lalwani,et al.  Isolated Vestibular Ossification after Meningitis Associated with Sensorineural Hearing Loss , 2003, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[5]  W M Luxford,et al.  Binaural cochlear implants. , 1992, The American journal of otology.

[6]  J M Bamford,et al.  Evaluation of binaural hearing aids in children using localization and speech intelligibility tasks. , 1981, British journal of audiology.

[7]  G M Clark,et al.  Fusion and lateralization study with two binaural cochlear implant patients. , 1995, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[8]  R J Nozza,et al.  Binaural release from masking for a speech sound in infants, preschoolers, and adults. , 1988, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[9]  F. Schön,et al.  Speech Reception Thresholds Obtained in a Symmetrical Four-Loudspeaker Arrangement from Bilateral Users of MED-EL Cochlear Implants , 2002, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[10]  J. Müller,et al.  Speech Understanding in Quiet and Noise in Bilateral Users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ Cochlear Implant System , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[11]  J. Brokx,et al.  Bilateral cochlear implantation in children. , 2003, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[12]  M Pelizzone,et al.  Bilateral electrical stimulation of a congenitally-deaf ear and of an acquired-deaf ear. , 1991, Acta oto-laryngologica.