Internet Communication Versus Face-to-face Interaction in Quality of Life

This study seeks to understand the role of the Internet in quality of life (QoL). Specifically, it examines the question of whether Internet communication serves, like face-to-face interactions, to enhance quality of life. It is hypothesized that the use of the Internet for interpersonal communication can improve quality of life among Internet users, just like face-to-face communication in everyday life. Sample survey data were collected in four Chinese cities, namely Hong Kong, Taipei, Beijing, and Wuhan, to serve as replicates to test the hypothesis. The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) of Diener (1984) was used to measure quality of life in the four cities. It was found that contrary to our expectation, Internet communication cannot predict quality of life while face-to-face communication with friends and family members can. The result was the same across the four Chinese cities. Possible reasons for this finding are examined and discussed.

[1]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[2]  Alexandra Rankin Macgill,et al.  Teens and social media , 2008 .

[3]  T. Wills,et al.  Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  R. Putnam.  Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital , 1995, The City Reader.

[5]  E. Diener,et al.  Subjective well-being. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  R. Birdwhistell.  Kinesics and context , 1970 .

[7]  D. Krackhardt.  The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations , 2003 .

[8]  B. Wellman,et al.  Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? , 1998, The American psychologist.

[10]  P. Thoits.  Multiple identities and psychological well-being: a reformulation and test of the social isolation hypothesis. , 1983, American sociological review.

[11]  Richard E. Lucas,et al.  Subjective Weil-Being: Three Decades of Progress , 2004 .

[12]  R. Daft,et al.  Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design , 1983 .

[13]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Information and Communication: Alternative Uses of the Internet in Households , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  R. Eccles,et al.  Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action , 1992 .

[15]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  W. Gove,et al.  The effect of children and employment on the mental health of married men and women. , 1977 .

[17]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[18]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  `Making Moosic': The Development of Personal Relationships on Line and a Comparison to their Off-Line Counterparts , 1998 .

[19]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective , 1987 .

[20]  R. Rice,et al.  The New Media: Communication, Research, and Technology. , 1984 .

[21]  John E. Ware,et al.  A model of mental health, life events, and social supports applicable to general populations , 1981 .

[22]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[23]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Internet Paradox Revisited , 2002 .

[24]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  Social isolation and new technology , 2009 .

[25]  Louis Leung,et al.  College Student Motives for Chatting on ICQ , 2001, New Media Soc..

[26]  J. Walther.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .