Advances in Micropipette Aspiration: Applications in Cell Biomechanics, Models, and Extended Studies.

With five decades of sustained application, micropipette aspiration has enabled a wide range of biomechanical studies in the field of cell mechanics. Here, we provide an update on the use of the technique, with a focus on recent developments in the analysis of the experiments, innovative microaspiration-based approaches, and applications in a broad variety of cell types. We first recapitulate experimental variations of the technique. We then discuss analysis models focusing on important limitations of widely used biomechanical models, which underpin the urge to adopt the appropriate ones to avoid misleading conclusions. The possibilities of performing different studies on the same cell are also considered.

[1]  R M Nerem,et al.  The application of a homogeneous half-space model in the analysis of endothelial cell micropipette measurements. , 1988, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[2]  G. Plaza,et al.  Contraction speed of the actomyosin cytoskeleton in the absence of the cell membrane , 2013 .

[3]  Lap Man Lee,et al.  Development of an advanced microfluidic micropipette aspiration device for single cell mechanics studies. , 2016, Biomicrofluidics.

[4]  B. Ladoux,et al.  Early Passage Dependence of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Mechanics Influences Cellular Invasion and Migration , 2016, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  D. Hammer,et al.  Micropipette aspiration of double emulsion-templated polymersomes , 2011 .

[6]  E Evans,et al.  Passive material behavior of granulocytes based on large deformation and recovery after deformation tests. , 1984 .

[7]  Craig A Simmons,et al.  Measurement of layer-specific mechanical properties in multilayered biomaterials by micropipette aspiration. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[8]  K. Dalnoki-Veress,et al.  Systematic study of alginate-based microcapsules by micropipette aspiration and confocal fluorescence microscopy. , 2013, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[9]  R. Hochmuth,et al.  Role of the membrane cortex in neutrophil deformation in small pipets. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[10]  P. Sens,et al.  Model for probing membrane-cortex adhesion by micropipette aspiration and fluctuation spectroscopy. , 2015, Biophysical journal.

[11]  Nathan J. Sniadecki,et al.  Review on Cell Mechanics: Experimental and Modeling Approaches , 2013 .

[12]  R M Hochmuth,et al.  Micropipette suction for measuring piconewton forces of adhesion and tether formation from neutrophil membranes. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[13]  J. Ross The Dark Matter of Biology , 2016, Biophysical journal.

[14]  D. Needham,et al.  Rapid Flow of Passive Neutrophils Into a 4 μm Pipet and Measurement of Cytoplasmic Viscosity , 1990 .

[15]  William J Polacheck,et al.  Measuring cell-generated forces: a guide to the available tools , 2016, Nature Methods.

[16]  Alessandro Nava,et al.  In vivo mechanical characterization of human liver , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[17]  Evans,et al.  Entropy-driven tension and bending elasticity in condensed-fluid membranes. , 1990, Physical review letters.

[18]  Jochen Guck,et al.  Critical review: cellular mechanobiology and amoeboid migration. , 2010, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[19]  Jeffrey J. Fredberg,et al.  Cell rheology: mush rather than machine. , 2013, Nature materials.

[20]  G. Plaza,et al.  Study of the influence of actin-binding proteins using linear analyses of cell deformability. , 2015, Soft matter.

[21]  Mahdi Navidbakhsh,et al.  Estimating Young's modulus of zona pellucida by micropipette aspiration in combination with theoretical models of ovum , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[22]  K. Guevorkian,et al.  Micropipette aspiration: A unique tool for exploring cell and tissue mechanics in vivo. , 2017, Methods in cell biology.

[23]  E. Evans,et al.  Cortical shell-liquid core model for passive flow of liquid-like spherical cells into micropipets. , 1989, Biophysical journal.

[24]  Farshid Guilak,et al.  Alterations in the mechanical properties of the human chondrocyte pericellular matrix with osteoarthritis. , 2003, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[25]  P. Chiarot,et al.  Membrane mechanical properties of synthetic asymmetric phospholipid vesicles. , 2016, Soft matter.

[26]  E. Evans,et al.  New membrane concept applied to the analysis of fluid shear- and micropipette-deformed red blood cells. , 1973, Biophysical journal.

[27]  Yu Sun,et al.  Automated Micropipette Aspiration of Single Cells , 2013, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  Chwee Teck Lim,et al.  Finite Element Simulation of the Micropipette Aspiration of a Living Cell Undergoing Large Viscoelastic Deformation , 2005 .

[29]  Peter Friedl,et al.  Mechanoreciprocity in cell migration , 2017, Nature Cell Biology.

[30]  Signatures of Mechanosensitive Gating. , 2017, Biophysical journal.

[31]  K. Šliogerytė,et al.  Differential effects of LifeAct-GFP and actin-GFP on cell mechanics assessed using micropipette aspiration , 2016, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  G. Charras,et al.  The cytoplasm of living cells behaves as a poroelastic material , 2013, Nature materials.

[33]  Simple measurement of the apparent viscosity of a cell from only one picture: Application to cardiac stem cells. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[34]  Jaydev P Desai,et al.  Mechanical phenotyping of stem cells. , 2011, Theriogenology.

[35]  Pablo A Iglesias,et al.  Molecular Mechanisms of Cellular Mechanosensing , 2013, Nature materials.

[36]  R. Burgkart,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of the cell nucleus. , 2000, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[37]  Blanca González-Bermúdez,et al.  Probing the effect of tip pressure on fungal growth: Application to Aspergillus nidulans. , 2017, Physical review. E.

[38]  Ruogang Zhao,et al.  Comparison of analytical and inverse finite element approaches to estimate cell viscoelastic properties by micropipette aspiration. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[39]  E. Evans,et al.  Apparent viscosity and cortical tension of blood granulocytes determined by micropipet aspiration. , 1989, Biophysical journal.

[40]  Chwee Teck Lim,et al.  Probing eukaryotic cell mechanics via mesoscopic simulations , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[41]  Zoltán Spiró,et al.  Multiscale force sensing in development , 2017, Nature Cell Biology.

[42]  A. Babataheri,et al.  Micropipette force probe to quantify single-cell force generation: application to T-cell activation , 2017, Molecular biology of the cell.

[43]  S. Quek,et al.  Power-law rheology analysis of cells undergoing micropipette aspiration , 2010, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[44]  Mostafa Rostami,et al.  Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells During Differentiation to Smooth Muscle Cells , 2013, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[45]  K. Luby‐Phelps The physical chemistry of cytoplasm and its influence on cell function: an update , 2013, Molecular biology of the cell.

[46]  Blanca González-Bermúdez,et al.  Improved Measurement of Elastic Properties of Cells by Micropipette Aspiration and Its Application to Lymphocytes , 2017, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[47]  François Nédélec,et al.  Asymmetric division of contractile domains couples cell positioning and fate specification , 2016, Nature.

[48]  Albrecht Ott,et al.  Rheological properties of the Eukaryotic cell cytoskeleton , 2007 .

[49]  Jin-Yu Shao,et al.  A modified micropipette aspiration technique and its application to tether formation from human neutrophils. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[50]  Xavier Trepat,et al.  Quantifying forces in cell biology , 2017, Nature Cell Biology.

[51]  Rajan P Kulkarni,et al.  Advances in high-throughput single-cell microtechnologies. , 2014, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[52]  R. Waugh,et al.  Passive mechanical behavior of human neutrophils: power-law fluid. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[53]  R. Hochmuth,et al.  Micropipette aspiration of living cells. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[54]  P. Janmey,et al.  Cell mechanics: integrating cell responses to mechanical stimuli. , 2007, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[55]  S. Vigmostad,et al.  Alterations in cancer cell mechanical properties after fluid shear stress exposure: a micropipette aspiration study , 2015, Cell health and cytoskeleton.

[56]  Brenna Hogan,et al.  Characterizing cell adhesion by using micropipette aspiration. , 2015, Biophysical journal.

[57]  A. Babataheri,et al.  Dynamic monitoring of cell mechanical properties using profile microindentation , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[58]  Jean-Léon Maître,et al.  Dual pipette aspiration: a unique tool for studying intercellular adhesion. , 2015, Methods in cell biology.

[59]  G. Plaza,et al.  Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Improves the Functional Properties of Cardiac Mesoangioblasts , 2015, Stem Cell Reviews and Reports.

[60]  R. Slavchov,et al.  Gigaseal Mechanics: Creep of the Gigaseal under the Action of Pressure, Adhesion, and Voltage , 2014, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[61]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  Membrane Tension Maintains Cell Polarity by Confining Signals to the Leading Edge during Neutrophil Migration , 2012, Cell.

[62]  Linhong Deng,et al.  Universal physical responses to stretch in the living cell , 2007, Nature.

[63]  Jaume Casademunt,et al.  Dynamical organization of the cytoskeletal cortex probed by micropipette aspiration , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[64]  Thomas Boudou,et al.  An extended modeling of the micropipette aspiration experiment for the characterization of the Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio of adherent thin biological samples: numerical and experimental studies. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[65]  R M Nerem,et al.  Application of the micropipette technique to the measurement of cultured porcine aortic endothelial cell viscoelastic properties. , 1990, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[66]  Amelia Ahmad Khalili,et al.  A Review of Cell Adhesion Studies for Biomedical and Biological Applications , 2015, International journal of molecular sciences.

[67]  G. Plaza,et al.  Cell Mechanosensors and the Possibilities of Using Magnetic Nanoparticles to Study Them and to Modify Cell Fate , 2017, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.