Influence of image resolution and thresholding on the apparent mass fractal characteristics of preferential flow patterns in field soils

Preferential flow is ubiquitous in field soils, where it has important practical implications for water and contaminant transport. Dyes are frequently used to visualize preferential flow pathways. The fact that stain patterns in pictures of soil profiles often exhibit convoluted geometries, reminiscent of fractals, has encouraged a number of authors to use the principles of fractal geometry to describe stain patterns. This description typically involves two numbers, a mass and a surface fractal dimension. The evaluation of either one via image analysis requires numerous subjective choices to be made, including choices regarding image resolution, the definition adopted for the "fractal" dimension, and the thresholding algorithm used to generate binary images. The present article analyzes in detail the influence of these various choices on the mass fractal dimension of stained preferential flow patterns. A theoretical framework in which to envisage these choices is developed, using the classical quadratic von Koch island as an example. This framework is then applied to a set of pictures of an actual stain pattern in an orchard soil. The results suggest that the (apparent) mass fractal dimension of the stain pattern varies between 1.56 and 1.88, depending on choices made at different stages in the evaluation of the fractal dimension. In each case considered, the dimension, determined by a straight line fit in a log-log plot, has extremely high statistical significance, with R. 0.999. Of the various parameters subject to choice, image resolution seems to have the most pronounced influence on the value of the fractal dimension, which increases markedly at higher resolution (smaller-pixel size). By analogy with the case of the quadratic von Koch island, this dependence on image resolution, as well as the fact that the surface area of the stain pattern does not decrease with pixel size, suggests that the stain pattern is not a mass fractal; that is, there is no reason to believe that its various dimensions differ from 2. The approach adopted in the present article could be useful whenever fractal dimensions are evaluated via image analysis.

[1]  Keith Beven,et al.  WATER FLOW IN SOIL MACROPORES I. AN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH , 1981 .

[2]  E. Jong,et al.  THE CHARACTERIZATION OF SOIL MACROPOROSITY WITH CT SCANNING , 1989 .

[3]  Kenneth Falconer,et al.  Fractal Geometry: Mathematical Foundations and Applications , 1990 .

[4]  Gabor Korvin,et al.  Fractal models in the earth sciences , 1992 .

[5]  C. Keel,et al.  Importance of Preferential Flow and Soil Management in Vertical Transport of a Biocontrol Strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens in Structured Field Soil , 1996, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[6]  John W. Crawford,et al.  Quantification of fungal morphology, gaseous transport and microbial dynamics in soil: an integrated framework utilising fractal geometry , 1993 .

[7]  John Mandel,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data , 1965 .

[8]  Satish C. Gupta,et al.  Flow Velocity Effects on the Retardation of FD&C Blue no. 1 Food Dye in Soil , 1998 .

[9]  K. Kung,et al.  Preferential flow in a sandy vadose zone: 1. Field observation , 1990 .

[10]  B. Dubuc,et al.  Error bounds on the estimation of fractal dimension , 1996 .

[11]  Hannes Flühler,et al.  Tracer Characteristics of Brilliant Blue FCF , 1995 .

[12]  William A. Jury,et al.  A Field Study Using Dyes to Characterize Preferential Flow of Water , 1990 .

[13]  P. Sollins,et al.  Bypass Water Flow through Unsaturated Microaggregated Tropical Soils , 1992 .

[14]  B. Mandelbrot Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[15]  E. Perfect,et al.  Linear and Nonlinear Estimates of Fractal Dimension for Soil Aggregate Fragmentation , 1995 .

[16]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  Soil Mass, Surface, and Spectral Fractal Dimensions Estimated from Thin Section Photographs , 1996 .

[17]  F. Bartoli,et al.  Structure and self‐similarity in silty and sandy soils: the fractal approach , 1991 .

[18]  John W. Crawford,et al.  On the relation between number-size distributions and the fractal dimension of aggregates , 1993 .

[19]  P. Sollins,et al.  Effects of Soil Physical Structure on Solute Transport in a Weathered Tropical Soil , 1988 .

[20]  L. Liebovitch,et al.  A fast algorithm to determine fractal dimensions by box counting , 1989 .

[21]  Hannes Flühler,et al.  SUSCEPTIBILITY OF SOILS TO PREFERENTIAL FLOW OF WATER : A FIELD STUDY , 1994 .

[22]  Russell Reeve,et al.  A warning about standard errors when estimating the fractal dimension , 1992 .

[23]  Philippe C. Baveye,et al.  Surface fractal characteristics of preferential flow patterns in field soils: evaluation and effect of image processing , 1999 .

[24]  Johan Bouma,et al.  A CASE STUDY ON INFILTRATION INTO DRY CLAY SOIL I. MORPHOLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS , 1978 .

[25]  D. R. Nielsen,et al.  Fractal description of wetting front instability in layered soils , 1994 .

[26]  I. Merwin,et al.  Orchard Groundcover Management Impacts on Apple Tree Growth and Yield, and Nutrient Availability and Uptake , 1994 .

[27]  H.W.G. Booltink,et al.  Using fractal dimensions of stained flow patterns in a clay soil to predict bypass flow. , 1992 .

[28]  William A. Jury,et al.  Fundamental Problems in the Stochastic Convection‐Dispersion Model of Solute Transport in Aquifers and Field Soils , 1986 .

[29]  Peter Pfeifer,et al.  Fractal dimension to describe soil macropore structure using X ray computed tomography , 1994 .

[30]  Graham W. Horgan,et al.  Image analysis for the biological sciences , 1997 .

[31]  C. Moore,et al.  Quantifying soil microstructure using fractals , 1995 .

[32]  P. Sollins,et al.  Improved Performance of Zero-Tension Lysimeters1 , 1987 .

[33]  Toshio Sakuma,et al.  Evaluation of the effect of morphological features of flow paths on solute transport by using fractal dimensions of methylene blue staining pattern , 1992 .

[34]  R. E. Phillips,et al.  Displacement of Soil Water by Simulated Rainfall1 , 1978 .