The effects of physical and virtual manipulatives on students' conceptual learning about pulleys

With computers becoming more ubiquitous in our daily lives and in our classrooms, questions of how students interact and learn with physical experiments and computer simulations are central in science education. We investigated how students' ideas about pulleys were influenced by the use of physical and virtual manipulatives. We found that there were advantages for each type of manipulative, and that virtual and physical manipulatives helped students develop correct understandings of different concepts. We also found that the order the manipulatives were used affected student learning, with students who used real pulleys before the simulation achieving higher scores on questions having to do with effort force, the distance the rope is pulled, and mechanical advantage.

[1]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Ontological Innovation and the Role of Theory in Design Experiments , 2004 .

[2]  L. Kamin Attention-like processes in classical conditioning , 1967 .

[3]  Sadhana Puntambekar,et al.  Improving Navigation and Learning in Hypertext Environments With Navigable Concept Maps , 2003, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[4]  Stephen E. Denton,et al.  Attention and salience in associative blocking , 2006, Learning & behavior.

[5]  Constantinos P. Constantinou,et al.  Comparing the influence of physical and virtual manipulatives in the context of the Physics by Inquiry curriculum: The case of undergraduate students’ conceptual understanding of heat and temperature , 2008 .

[6]  Lara M. Triona,et al.  Point and Click or Grab and Heft: Comparing the Influence of Physical and Virtual Instructional Materials on Elementary School Students' Ability to Design Experiments , 2003 .

[7]  Daniel C. Edelson Design Research: What We Learn When We Engage in Design , 2002 .

[8]  Ference Marton,et al.  Phenomenography-a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality , 1986 .

[9]  Ithel Jones The effect of computer-generated spoken feedback on kindergarten students' written narratives , 1998 .

[10]  Marios Papaevripidou,et al.  Effects of experimenting with physical and virtual manipulatives on students' conceptual understanding in heat and temperature , 2008 .

[11]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[12]  Lara M. Triona,et al.  Hands on What? The Relative Effectiveness of Physical versus Virtual Materials in an Engineering Design Project by Middle School Children , 2007 .

[13]  Abbie Brown,et al.  Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in c , 1992 .

[14]  W. V. van Joolingen,et al.  Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains , 1998 .

[15]  C. Haas How the writing medium shapes the writing process: Effects of word processing on planning , 1989 .

[16]  Allan Collins,et al.  Toward a Design Science of Education , 1992 .

[17]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  An Attainable Version of High Literacy: Approaches to Teaching Higher-Order Skills in Reading and Writing , 1987 .

[18]  Acknowledgments , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[19]  A. Karmiloff-Smith Précis of Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[20]  S. Papert The children's machine: rethinking school in the age of the computer , 1993 .

[21]  Frieda Goldman Eisler Psycholinguistics : experiments in spontaneous speech , 1968 .

[22]  Noah S. Podolefsky,et al.  When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment , 2005 .