Instrumental performance following a shift in primary motivation depends on incentive learning.

In 5 experiments the role of incentive learning in instrumental performance following a shift in primary motivation was examined. In Experiments 1 and 2 rats trained to perform an instrumental action reinforced by either pellets or maltodextrin when in a low-deprivation state were shifted to a high-deprivation state and tested in extinction. This shift in deprivation increased performance only if the animals had been exposed to the reinforcer in the high-deprivation state prior to instrumental training. Experiments 3, 4, and 5 examined the reverse shift training in a high-deprivation state and testing in a low-deprivation state, and found, similarly, that performance was only sensitive to this shift if animals were previously exposed to the reinforcer while in the low-deprivation state. These experiments support the conclusion that instrumental performance following revaluation of the reinforcer depends on a process of incentive learning.

[1]  B. Balleine,et al.  Instrumental Performance following Reinforcer Devaluation Depends upon Incentive Learning , 1991 .

[2]  Kent C. Berridge,et al.  Modulation of taste affect by hunger, caloric satiety, and sensory-specific satiety in the rat , 1991, Appetite.

[3]  R. Bolles The Hedonics of taste , 1991 .

[4]  B. Balleine,et al.  Motivational Control of Instrumental Performance following a Shift from Thirst to Hunger , 1990, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[5]  T. Powley,et al.  Taste, experience, and feeding , 1990 .

[6]  S. Klein,et al.  Pavlovian conditioning and the status of traditional learning theory , 1991 .

[7]  B. Balleine,et al.  Incentive learning and the motivational control of instrumental performance by thirst , 1989 .

[8]  A. Dickinson Expectancy theory in animal conditioning. , 1989 .

[9]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Motivational Control of Instrumental Performance: The Role of Prior Experience of The Reinforcer , 1988 .

[10]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Pavlovian Processes in the Motivational Control of Instrumental Performance , 1987 .

[11]  J. Bradford,et al.  Conditioned flavor preferences based on delayed caloric consequences. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[12]  R. Boakes,et al.  Can rats learn to associate a flavour with the delayed delivery of food? , 1986, Appetite.

[13]  R. Rescorla,et al.  Associative Structures In Instrumental Learning , 1986 .

[14]  K. Berridge,et al.  Taste reactivity as a measure of the neural control of palatability , 1985 .

[15]  R. Rescorla,et al.  Postconditioning devaluation of a reinforcer affects instrumental responding. , 1985 .

[16]  Elizabeth D. Capaldi,et al.  Conditioned flavor preferences based on hunger level during original flavor exposure , 1983 .

[17]  E. Capaldi,et al.  Taste preferences as a function of food deprivation during original taste exposure , 1982 .

[18]  Christopher D. Adams,et al.  Instrumental Responding following Reinforcer Devaluation , 1981 .

[19]  R. Hendersen,et al.  Avoidance of heat by rats: Effects of thermal context on rapidity of extinction , 1979 .

[20]  P. Holland,et al.  Differential effects of two ways of devaluing the unconditioned stimulus after Pavlovian appetitive conditioning. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[21]  J. Krebs,et al.  Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach , 1978 .

[22]  T. S. Hyde The effect of Pavlovian stimuli on the acquisition of a new response , 1976 .

[23]  R. Rescorla,et al.  The effect of two ways of devaluing the unconditioned stimulus after first- and second-order appetitive conditioning. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[24]  E. Holman Some conditions for the dissociation of consummatory and instrumental behavior in rats , 1975 .

[25]  M. Morgan Resistance to satiation , 1974 .

[26]  M. Cabanac Physiological Role of Pleasure , 1971, Science.

[27]  J. D. A. M. E. Bitierman OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR DIFFERENTIAL REINFORCEMENT OF OTHER BEHAVIOR ( DRO ) : A YOKED-CONTROL COMPARISON ' , 2005 .

[28]  S. Revusky,et al.  Learned Associations Over Long Delays1 , 1970 .

[29]  R. Rescorla,et al.  Effect of response-independent reinforcers during extinction. , 1969 .

[30]  S. Revusky Effects of thirst level during consumption of flavored water on subsequent preference. , 1968 .

[31]  S. Revusky Hunger level during food consumption: Effects on subsequent preference , 1967 .

[32]  R. Bolles Theory of Motivation , 1967 .

[33]  C. P. Crocetti Drive Level and Response Strength in the Bar-Pressing Apparatus , 1962 .

[34]  Habit Strength as a Function of Drive in a Bar-Pressing Situation , 1961 .

[35]  G. Grice,et al.  Effect of irrelevant thirst motivation on a response learned with food reward. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[36]  C. L. Hull,et al.  A Behavior System , 1954 .

[37]  H. G. Yamaguchi Drive as a function of hours of hunger. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.

[38]  B. Horenstein Performance of conditioned responses as a function of strength of hunger drive. , 1951, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[39]  R. Strassburger Resistance to extinction of a conditioned operant as related to drive level at reinforcement. , 1950, Journal of experimental psychology.

[40]  E. Tolman The nature and functioning of wants. , 1949, Psychological review.

[41]  E. Tolman There is more than one kind of learning. , 1949, Psychological review.

[42]  L. Saltzman,et al.  The effect of low intensities of hunger on the behavior mediated by a habit of maximum strength. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.

[43]  S. Koch,et al.  The effect of satiation on the behavior mediated by a habit of maximum strength. , 1945 .

[44]  P. S. Siegel A note on the construction of Skinner box pellets. , 1944 .

[45]  B. Skinner,et al.  Principles of Behavior , 1944 .

[46]  C. T. Perin Behavior potentiality as a joint function of the amount of training and the degree of hunger at the time of extinction. , 1942 .

[47]  G. Heathers,et al.  The relation between strength of drive and rate of extinction of a bar-pressing reaction in the rat. , 1941 .

[48]  J. L. Finan,et al.  Quantitative studies in motivation. I. Strength of conditioning in rats under varying degrees of hunger. , 1940 .

[49]  R. S. Sackett The effect of strength of drive at the time of extinction upon resistance to extinction in rats. , 1939 .

[50]  B. Skinner Conditioning and Extinction and Their Relation to Drive , 1936 .

[51]  C. L. Hull Knowledge and purpose as habit mechanisms. , 1930 .