Weakly versus strongly multihop space-division optical networks

Transparent multihop optical networks suffer from the accumulation from node to node of crosstalk and amplified spontaneous emission noise, which may severely degrade the quality of received signals. It is thus important to keep the number of intermediate hops as low as possible. This paper compares two single-wavelength cell-switching space-division optical networks that employ deflection routing. The first has a well-known Manhattan street (MS) distributed topology. The mean internodal distance of this network is approximately the square root of the number of nodes. We term this network as strongly multihop. The second has a centralized star topology: the star is a multistage space-division photonic switch with limited buffers. Deflected cells delivered to the wrong user are transparently rerouted to the star. This network is intrinsically single-hop and gradually becomes multihop because of deflections. We term this network as weakly multihop. As the carried traffic increases, the link load increases much more rapidly in the strongly multihop topology, and so do both the crosstalk level per hop and the number of hops caused by deflections. For the same carried traffic, the accumulated crosstalk and spontaneous emission levels in a well-designed star-based network are much lower than in a strongly multihop network. Hence, lower packet error rates and lower delay jitter are expected for the centralized network. Moreover, for both networks, a simple frequency sweeping technique is shown to substantially reduce the dominant signal-crosstalk beat, thus allowing network operation with switch crosstalk factors as low as -20 dB.

[1]  Claus Popp Larsen,et al.  Experimental and analytical evaluation of packaged 4/spl times/4 InGaAsP/InP semiconductor optical amplifier gate switch matrices for optical networks , 1996 .

[2]  P. Humblet,et al.  On the bit error rate of lightwave systems with optical amplifiers , 1991 .

[3]  Leonid G. Kazovsky,et al.  Theory of direct-detection lightwave receivers using optical amplifiers , 1991 .

[4]  D.J. Blumenthal,et al.  Demonstration of a deflection routing 2*2 photonic switch for computer interconnects , 1992, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[5]  P. Baran,et al.  On Distributed Communications Networks , 1964 .

[6]  N. Olsson Lightwave systems with optical amplifiers , 1989 .

[7]  W. Daniel Hillis,et al.  The connection machine , 1985 .

[8]  J. O'Reilly,et al.  Modelling of interferometric crosstalk in optical networks , 1996, Proceedings of GLOBECOM'96. 1996 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[9]  Alberto Bononi,et al.  Analysis and comparison of hot-potato and single-buffer deflection routing in very high bit rate optical mesh networks , 1995, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[10]  Alberto Bononi Transmission analysis of a space-division optical star network with deflection routing , 1996 .

[11]  E. Parzen 1. Random Variables and Stochastic Processes , 1999 .

[12]  Nicholas F. Maxemchuk,et al.  Comparison of deflection and store-and-forward techniques in the Manhattan Street and Shuffle-Exchange Networks , 1989, IEEE INFOCOM '89, Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[13]  Christopher Rose Mean internodal distance in regular and random multihop networks , 1992, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[14]  E. Goldstein,et al.  Scaling limitations in transparent optical networks due to low-level crosstalk , 1995, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[15]  Ozan K. Tonguz,et al.  Fiber-optic Interconnection of Local Area Networks: Physical Limitations of Topologies , 1993 .

[16]  Albert G. Greenberg,et al.  Deflection routing in hypercube networks , 1992, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[17]  Athanasios Papoulis,et al.  Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes , 1965 .

[18]  P. Humblet,et al.  Amplifier induced crosstalk in multichannel optical networks , 1990 .

[19]  Sheldon M. Ross,et al.  Stochastic Processes , 2018, Gauge Integral Structures for Stochastic Calculus and Quantum Electrodynamics.