Using Social Media for Government Passive Expert-Sourcing

Social Media have been initially used by government agencies for general public oriented ‘citizen-sourcing’. Though this enabled the collection of useful policy relevant information and knowledge from the general public, and provided valuable insights into their relevant perceptions, it would be quite useful if this could be combined with the collection of policy relevant information and knowledge from experts as well (‘expert-sourcing’). In this paper, a passive expert-sourcing method based on social media, which has been developed in a European research project, is evaluated from a fundamental perspective: the wicked problems theory perspective. In particular, we investigate to what extent this method enables government agencies to collect high quality information concerning the main elements of important social problems to be addressed through public policies: particular issues posed, alternative interventions/ actions, and advantages/disadvantages of them; as well as to what extent there is consensus about these elements among different stakeholder groups. For this purpose data are collected through interviews with Members of the Greek Parliament. From their analysis interesting conclusions have been drawn about the strengths and weaknesses of this expert-sourcing method, as well as required improvements of it.

[1]  Christoph Ihl,et al.  Citizensourcing: Applying the Concept of Open Innovation to the Public Sector , 2010 .

[2]  Claudio M. Radaelli,et al.  The public policy of the European Union: whither politics of expertise? , 1999 .

[3]  Claudio M. Radaelli,et al.  The role of knowledge in the policy process , 1995 .

[4]  Arnim Bleier,et al.  Engaging Politicians with Citizens on Social Networking Sites: The WeGov Toolbox , 2012, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[5]  Victor Bekkers,et al.  Social media monitoring: Responsive governance in the shadow of surveillance? , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[6]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Conceptualizing smartness in government: An integrative and multi-dimensional view , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[7]  D. Shaw UN Research Institute for Social Development , 2002 .

[8]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[9]  I. C. Meijer The wisdom of crowds , 2010 .

[10]  Ines Mergel,et al.  Social media institutionalization in the U.S. federal government , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[11]  B. Head Wicked Problems in Public Policy , 2008 .

[12]  Taewoo Nam,et al.  Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0 , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[13]  Milja Kurki,et al.  Democracy through Technocracy? Reflections on Technocratic Assumptions in EU Democracy Promotion Discourse , 2011 .

[14]  Bruce Gilley,et al.  Technocracy and democracy as spheres of justice in public policy , 2017 .

[15]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Towards an Information Systems Perspective and Research Agenda on Crowdsourcing for Innovation , 2013, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Ines Mergel,et al.  Social media adoption: toward a representative, responsive or interactive government? , 2014, DG.O.

[17]  Kuntz Werner,et al.  Issues as Elements of Information Systems , 1970 .

[18]  Dennis Linders,et al.  From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[19]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Passive Expert-Sourcing for Policy Making in the European Union , 2016, ePart.

[20]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Participative Public Policy Making Through Multiple Social Media Platforms Utilization , 2012, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[21]  Donald R. Cooper,et al.  Business Research Methods , 1980 .

[22]  James Surowiecki The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations Doubleday Books. , 2004 .

[23]  G. Khan Models for Social Media-Based Governments , 2015 .

[24]  Michael L. Begeman,et al.  gIBIS: A tool for all reasons , 1989, JASIS.

[25]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Policy making 2.0: From theory to practice , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[26]  Gohar Feroz Khan,et al.  The Government 2.0 utilization model and implementation scenarios , 2015 .

[27]  Ilkka Kauranen,et al.  Crowdsourcing: a comprehensive literature review , 2015 .

[28]  Frank Fischer,et al.  Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise. , 1991 .

[29]  K. Desouza,et al.  Implementing Open Innovation in the Public Sector : the Case of Challenge.gov , 2013 .

[30]  Jeff Conklin,et al.  Dialog Mapping: Reflections on an Industrial Strength Case Study , 2003, Visualizing Argumentation.

[31]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Constructing social research :the unity and diversity of method , 1996 .

[32]  Lei Zheng,et al.  Mapping government social media research and moving it forward: A framework and a research agenda , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[33]  Werner Kunz,et al.  Information science: On the structure of its problems , 1972, Inf. Storage Retr..

[34]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  An Analysis of Multiple Social Media Consultations in the European Parliament from a Public Policy Perspective , 2014, ECIS.

[35]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media , 2010 .

[36]  Michael J. Magro A Review of Social Media Use in E-Government , 2012 .

[37]  Daren C. Brabham Crowdsourcing as a Model for Problem Solving , 2008 .

[38]  J. Breslin,et al.  Social Software Infrastructure for e-Participation , 2016, Government Information Quarterly.

[39]  Brian A Vander Schee Crowdsourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd Is Driving the Future of Business , 2009 .

[40]  Araz Taeihagh,et al.  The Fundamentals of Policy Crowdsourcing , 2015, ArXiv.

[41]  Ryan Holifield,et al.  Science in democracy: Expertise, institutions and representation , 2012 .

[42]  Richard Coyne,et al.  Wicked problems revisited , 2005 .

[43]  Anders Esmark,et al.  Maybe It Is Time to Rediscover Technocracy? An Old Framework for a New Analysis of Administrative Reforms in the Governance Era , 2016 .

[44]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Promoting open innovation in the public sector through social media monitoring , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..