Coping with phonological assimilation in speech perception: Evidence for early compensation

The pronunciation of the same word may vary considerably as a consequence of its context. The Dutch wordtuin (English,garden) may be pronouncedtuim if followed bybank (English,bench), but not if followed bystoel (English,chair). In a series of four experiments, we examined how Dutch listeners cope with this context sensitivity in their native language. A first word identification experiment showed that the perception of a word-final nasal depends on the subsequent context. Viable assimilations, but not unviable assimilations, were often confused perceptually with canonical word forms in a word identification task. Two control experiments ruled out the possibility that this effect was caused by perceptual masking or was influenced by lexical top-down effects. A passive-listening study in which electrophysiological measurements were used showed that only unviable, but not viable, phonological changes elicited a significant mismatch negativity. The results indicate that phonological assimilations are dealt with by an early prelexical mechanism.

[1]  J. H. Neely Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .

[2]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Phonological variation and inference in lexical access. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Mechanisms of phonological inference in speech perception. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  V. V. Heuven,et al.  Sprekerstrategie en de perceptieve dominantie van het woordbegin , 1982 .

[5]  Bart de Boer,et al.  Self-organization in vowel systems , 2000, J. Phonetics.

[6]  Richard M. Warren,et al.  Identification times for phonemic components of graded complexity and for spelling of speech , 1971 .

[7]  J. Sinnott,et al.  Differences in American English, Spanish, and monkey perception of thesay-stay trading relation , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  H. Schulze,et al.  Discrimination learning of amplitude modulated tones in Mongolian gerbils , 1999, Neuroscience Letters.

[9]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Mechanisms of phonological inference in speech perception. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  W. Ganong Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Misun Seo A Perception-based Study of Sonorant Assimilation in Korean , 2001 .

[12]  Patricia A. Keating,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: The window model of coarticulation: articulatory evidence , 1990 .

[13]  R. Näätänen The Mismatch Negativity: A Powerful Tool for Cognitive Neuroscience , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[14]  Keith Johnson,et al.  The Role of Speech Perception in Phonology , 2001 .

[15]  Francis Nolan,et al.  Gesture, Segment, Prosody: The descriptive role of segments: evidence from assimilation , 1992 .

[16]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Effects of subphonetic and syllable structure variation on word recognition , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  Susan Bowsfield The Symbolic Species: The Co-Evolution of Language and the Brain , 2004 .

[18]  B H Repp,et al.  Perception of the [m]-[n] distinction in VC syllables. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  A. Samuel Does lexical information influence the perceptual restoration of phonemes , 1996 .

[20]  D. Steriade Directional asymmetries in place assimilation: a perceptual account , 2001 .

[21]  W Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: words, phonemes, and features. , 1994, Psychological review.

[22]  I. Mees,et al.  The phonetics of English and Dutch , 1996 .

[23]  H. Nusbaum,et al.  The development of speech perception : the transition from speech sounds to spoken words , 1997 .

[24]  Paavo Alku,et al.  Memory Traces for Words as Revealed by the Mismatch Negativity , 2001, NeuroImage.

[25]  I. Winkler,et al.  The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  A. Lotto,et al.  Perceptual compensation for coarticulation by Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  R. Näätänen Attention and brain function , 1992 .

[28]  A. Lotto,et al.  Influence of fundamental frequency on stop-consonant voicing perception: a case of learned covariation or auditory enhancement? , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Basic processes in reading : visual word recognition , 1993 .

[30]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses , 1997, Nature.

[31]  D. Gow Assimilation and Anticipation in Continuous Spoken Word Recognition , 2001 .

[32]  R. Krakow,et al.  Perception of coarticulatory nasalization by speakers of English and Thai: evidence for partial compensation. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Auditory Cortex Accesses Phonological Categories: An MEG Mismatch Study , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  J. Wunderlich,et al.  Effects of stimulus frequency and complexity on the mismatch negativity and other components of the cortical auditory-evoked potential. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  A. Lotto,et al.  General contrast effects in speech perception: Effect of preceding liquid on stop consonant identification , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  Roger M. Carpenter,et al.  Auditory Perception: A New Analysis and Synthesis , 1999 .

[37]  R. Cole Listening for mispronunciations: A measure of what we hear during speech , 1973 .

[38]  E. Schröger Measurement and interpretation of the mismatch negativity , 1998 .

[39]  M. Tervaniemi,et al.  Development of a memory trace for a complex sound in the human brain. , 1993, Neuroreport.

[40]  Perceptual distance and competition in lexical access. , 1996 .

[41]  David W. Gow,et al.  Acoustic modification in English place assimilation , 1999 .

[42]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Perceptual distance and competition in lexical access. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  I. Silver,et al.  ATP and Brain Function , 1989, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[44]  R L Diehl,et al.  On the Role of Perception in Shaping Phonological Assimilation Rules , 1992, Language and speech.

[45]  C. Best The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation model. , 1994 .

[46]  Yoshitaka Nakajima,et al.  Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound Albert S. Bregman , 1992 .

[47]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[48]  Mark Huckvale,et al.  Opportunities for re-convergence of engineering and cognitive science accounts of spoken word recognition , 1998 .

[49]  S Nittrouer,et al.  Discriminability and perceptual weighting of some acoustic cues to speech perception by 3-year-olds. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[50]  D. Gow Does English coronal place assimilation create lexical ambiguity , 2002 .

[51]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Phonological variation and inference in lexical access. , 1996 .

[52]  Albert S. Bregman,et al.  The Auditory Scene. (Book Reviews: Auditory Scene Analysis. The Perceptual Organization of Sound.) , 1990 .

[53]  V. Mann,et al.  Contrast effects do not underlie effects of preceding liquids on stop-consonant identification by humans. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[54]  Richard M. Warren Phonemic organization does not occur: Hence no feedback , 2000 .

[55]  G. Booij The Phonology of Dutch , 1995 .

[56]  Guillaume Thierry,et al.  ERP Mapping in Phonological and Lexical Semantic Monitoring Tasks: A Study Complementing Previous PET Results , 1998, NeuroImage.

[57]  C A Fowler,et al.  Perceptual parsing of acoustic consequences of velum lowering from information for vowels , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[58]  D Norris,et al.  Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[59]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  A Connectionist Model of Phonological Representation in Speech Perception , 1995, Cogn. Sci..

[60]  R Näätänen,et al.  Pre-attentive detection of vowel contrasts utilizes both phonetic and auditory memory representations. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[61]  D. Norris Autonomous processes in comprehension: A reply to Marslen-Wilson and Tyler , 1982, Cognition.

[62]  B. Repp Perception of the [m]-[n] distinction in CV syllables. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[63]  J A Bashford,et al.  Tweaking the lexicon: Organization of vowel sequences into words , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[64]  Refractor Vision , 2000, The Lancet.