Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for product aspect ranking: TOPSIS and VIKOR

The extracted product aspects (like “battery life”, “zoom”) from online customer reviews are dissimilar in their significances, some of these aspects have a great influence on the potential customer's decision likewise on the businesses' strategies for product enhancements. Supporting the probable customers with a list of the most representative product aspects will assist their purchasing decision and facilitate the comparative process among the presented products. For the firms, identifying critical product aspects creates a new perspective of product manufacturing and marketing strategies to be competitive and innovative. However the manual identification of the most representative product aspects from the huge amounts of the extracted product aspects in online reviews is a tedious and time-consuming task. Thus, ranking the extracted aspects becomes a necessity to identify the important product aspects mentioned in the customer reviews. The purpose of this study is to formulate the product aspect ranking problem as a decision making process using Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM). In response, a comparative analysis between two different MCDM ranking approaches, namely; TOPSIS and VIKOR has been conducted to investigate their performances in prioritizing the most important product aspects in customer reviews. The experimental results on different product reviews demonstrate the effectiveness of these two methods in prioritizing the genuine product aspects in customer feedback.

[1]  Meng Wang,et al.  Product Aspect Ranking and Its Applications , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[2]  Bing Liu,et al.  Mining and summarizing customer reviews , 2004, KDD.

[3]  E. Stanley Lee,et al.  An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[4]  Jaana Kekäläinen,et al.  Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques , 2002, TOIS.

[5]  Yue Lu,et al.  Latent aspect rating analysis on review text data: a rating regression approach , 2010, KDD.

[6]  Janyce Wiebe,et al.  Recognizing Contextual Polarity in Phrase-Level Sentiment Analysis , 2005, HLT.

[7]  Satinee Lertprapai,et al.  Review: Multiple Criteria Decision Making Method with Applications , 2013 .

[8]  Savina Bansal,et al.  Effect of normalization techniques in VIKOR method for network selection in heterogeneous networks , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research.

[9]  Changqin Quan,et al.  Unsupervised product feature extraction for feature-oriented opinion determination , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[10]  Regina Barzilay,et al.  Multiple Aspect Ranking Using the Good Grief Algorithm , 2007, NAACL.

[11]  Ranjana Badre,et al.  Product Aspect Identification and Ranking System , 2015 .

[12]  Sohail Asghar,et al.  A survey on multi-criteria decision making approaches , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Emerging Technologies.

[13]  J. Keziya Rani,et al.  Mining Opinion Features in Customer Reviews. , 2016 .

[14]  Patrick T. Hester,et al.  An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods , 2013 .

[15]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Integrating Fuzzy C-Means and TOPSIS for performance evaluation: An application and comparative analysis , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[16]  S. Sobitha Ahila MULTI AGENT BASED ASPECT RANKING REVIEW SUMMARIZATION FOR CUSTOMER GUIDANCE , 2015 .

[17]  Japinder Singh,et al.  Feature-based opinion mining and ranking , 2012, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[18]  Tien Ping Tan,et al.  Mining opinionated product features using WordNet lexicographer files , 2017, J. Inf. Sci..

[19]  Zehra Kavasoğlu PERSONALIZED SUMMARIZATION OF CUSTOMER REVIEWS BASED ON USER’S BROWSING HISTORY , 2013 .

[20]  Mohammad Najmud Doja,et al.  Feature and Opinion Mining for Customer Review Summarization , 2009, PReMI.

[21]  Handaru Jati,et al.  Comparison of University Webometrics Ranking Using Multicriteria Decision Analysis : TOPSIS and VIKOR Method , .

[22]  S Ancy.J.,et al.  A Survey on Product Aspect RankingTechniques , 2015 .

[23]  Morteza Yazdani,et al.  A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[24]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Sentiment in short strength detection informal text , 2010 .