Improvement of railway ballast maintenance approach, incorporating ballast geometry and fouling conditions

Abstract Ballast plays an important role in the stability of railway track systems. The effectiveness of the ballast in maintaining the track stability is very much dependent on its mechanical conditions. The available ballast maintenance approaches are mainly based on only track geometry conditions (such as track profile) which do not sufficiently reflect the ballast mechanical behaviors. That is, the ballast potential of degradation (i.e., ballast long term behaviors) has been omitted. This makes the effectiveness of the current ballast maintenance approach questionable, indicating a need for a more comprehensive and effective ballast conditions assessment technique. In response to this need, two ballast condition indices based on ballast geometry degradation (BGI) and the level of ballast fouling (BFI) as the main indicators of ballast mechanical behavior were developed. The BGI is a function of the standard deviations of track alignment, unevenness and twist. The BFI was developed based on the data obtained from the ground penetration radar (GPR). Making use of the new indices, a more reliable maintenance algorithm was developed. Through illustrations of the applicability of the new maintenance algorithm in a railway line, it was shown that the new algorithm causes a considerable improvement in the maintenance effectiveness and an increase in the life cycle of railway tracks by making more effective allocation of resources and more accurate maintenance planning.

[1]  H Misar.  INTELLIGENT BALLAST MANAGEMENT WILL CUT COSTS , 2002 .

[2]  Abdur Rohim Boy Berawi.  Improving Railway Track Maintenance Using Power Spectral Density (PSD) , 2013 .

[3]  Francesca De Chiara,et al.  Railways Track Characterization Using Ground Penetrating Radar , 2016 .

[4]  Florian Auer.  Multi-function Track Recording Cars , 2013 .

[5]  Alan Stirling,et al.  Evaluation of railway trackbed and formation: a case study , 2003 .

[6]  Johannes Hugenschmidt,et al.  Railway track inspection using GPR , 2000 .

[7]  Hwasoo Yeo,et al.  A comparative study of time-based maintenance and condition-based maintenance for optimal choice of maintenance policy , 2016 .

[8]  P. Anbazhagan,et al.  Model track studies on fouled ballast using ground penetrating radar and multichannel analysis of surface wave , 2011 .

[9]  Paulo Fonseca Teixeira,et al.  Optimisation model to schedule railway track renewal operations: a life-cycle cost approach , 2015 .

[10]  Isabel M. Ribeiro,et al.  Railway condition-based maintenance model with stochastic deterioration , 2014 .

[11]  Ernest T. Selig,et al.  Track Geotechnology and Substructure Management , 1995 .

[12]  Z. Khakiev,et al.  GPR determination of physical parameters of railway structural layers , 2014 .

[13]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Maintenance and management of civil infrastructure based on condition, safety, optimization, and life-cycle cost* , 2007 .

[14]  Fernando L. Teixeira,et al.  Application of time-reversal-based processing techniques to enhance detection of GPR targets , 2016 .

[15]  Javad Sadeghi,et al.  Development of improved railway track degradation models , 2010 .

[16]  Hakan Guler,et al.  Prediction of railway track geometry deterioration using artificial neural networks: a case study for Turkish state railways , 2014 .

[17]  D R Uzarski,et al.  Development of Condition Indexes for Low Volume Railroad Track , 1993 .

[18]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  Behaviour of clay-fouled ballast under cyclic loading , 2014 .

[19]  P. Anbazhagan,et al.  Identification of type and degree of railway ballast fouling using ground coupled GPR antennas , 2016 .

[20]  Henrikas Sivilevičius,et al.  Determination and evaluation of railway aggregate sub-ballast gradation and other properties variation , 2016 .

[21]  Michael Forde,et al.  Benchmarking large scale GPR experiments on railway ballast , 2015 .

[22]  Antti Nurmikolu,et al.  Degradation and frost susceptibility of crushed rock aggregates used in structural layers of railway track , 2005 .

[23]  Francisco G. Benitez,et al.  Towards automated and cost-efficient track maintenance. Final developments of the ACEM-Rail project , 2014 .

[24]  E. Cardarelli,et al.  Pavement testing by integrated geophysical methods: Feasibility, resolution and diagnostic potential , 2017 .

[25]  Sanjay Nimbalkar,et al.  Improved Performance of Railway Ballast under Impact Loads Using Shock Mats , 2012 .

[26]  Javad Sadeghi,et al.  Development of track condition assessment model based on visual inspection , 2011 .

[27]  Javad Sadeghi,et al.  Development of Railway Track Geometry Indexes Based on Statistical Distribution of Geometry Data , 2010 .

[28]  D. A. Barry,et al.  Efficiency and potential environmental impacts of different cleaning agents used on contaminated railway ballast , 2002 .

[29]  Erol Tutumluer,et al.  Subsurface Evaluation of Railway Track Using Ground Penetrating Radar , 2008 .

[30]  R. Czarny,et al.  Capabilities of seismic and georadar 2D/3D imaging of shallow subsurface of transport route using the Seismobile system , 2017 .