Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance

Objective: To investigate the performance of low-dose, dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot (SAS) mode for the diagnosis of significant coronary artery stenoses in comparison with conventional coronary angiography (CCA). Design, setting and patients: Prospective, single-centre study conducted in a referral centre enrolling 120 patients (71 men, mean (SD) age 68 (9) years, mean (SD) body mass index 26.2 (3.2) kg/m2). All study participants underwent DSCT in the SAS mode and CCA within 14 days. Twenty-seven patients were given intravenous β blockers for heart rate reduction before CT. Patients were excluded if a target heart rate ⩽70 bpm could not be achieved by β blockers or when the patients were in non-sinus rhythm. Two blinded readers independently evaluated coronary artery segments for assessability and for the presence of significant (>50%) stenoses. Sensitivity, specificity, negative (NPV) and positive predictive values (PPV) were determined, with CCA being the standard of reference. Radiation dose values were calculated. Results: DSCT coronary angiography in the SAS mode was successfully performed in all 120 patients. Mean (SD) heart rate during scanning was 59 (6) bpm (range 44–69). 1773/1803 coronary segments (98%) were depicted with a diagnostic image quality in 109/120 patients (91%). The overall patient-based sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for the diagnosis of significant stenoses were 100%, 93%, 94% and 100%, respectively. The mean (SD) effective dose of the CT protocol was 2.5 (0.8) mSv (range 1.2–4.4). Conclusions: DSCT coronary angiography in the SAS mode allows, in selected patients with a regular heart rate, the accurate diagnosis of significant coronary stenoses at a low radiation dose.

[1]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Combining dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography and calcium scoring: added value for the assessment of coronary artery disease , 2007, Heart.

[2]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography: influence of obesity, calcium load, and heart rate on diagnostic accuracy. , 2008, European heart journal.

[3]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control , 2006, European Radiology.

[4]  F. Sebening,et al.  [Coronary artery disease]. , 1980, Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Herz- und Kreislaufforschung.

[5]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system , 2006, European Radiology.

[6]  Gabriel P. Krestin,et al.  High-Resolution Spiral Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography in Patients Referred for Diagnostic Conventional Coronary Angiography , 2005, Circulation.

[7]  W. B. Meijboom,et al.  Reliable high-speed coronary computed tomography in symptomatic patients. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  S. Abbara,et al.  Prospectively Gated Transverse Coronary CT Angiography versus Retrospectively Gated Helical Technique: Improved Image Quality and Reduced Radiation Dose , 2008 .

[9]  S. Wildermuth,et al.  Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. , 2005, European heart journal.

[10]  Fuminari Tatsugami,et al.  Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. , 2007, European heart journal.

[11]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Image Quality and Reconstruction Intervals of Dual-Source CT Coronary Angiography: Recommendations for ECG-Pulsing Windowing , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[12]  D. Brenner,et al.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  A. Schmermund,et al.  Use of automatic exposure control in multislice computed tomography of the coronaries: comparison of 16-slice and 64-slice scanner data with conventional coronary angiography , 2007, Heart.

[14]  J. Paul,et al.  MDCT of the coronary arteries: feasibility of low-dose CT with ECG-pulsed tube current modulation to reduce radiation dose. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography , 2008, European Radiology.

[16]  M. Reiser,et al.  Image Quality, Motion Artifacts, and Reconstruction Timing of 64-Slice Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography With 0.33-Second Rotation Speed , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[17]  G. Diamond,et al.  Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. , 1979, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Anthony R. Benedetto,et al.  Monte Carlo Simulation in the Radiological Sciences , 1989 .

[19]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Which patients should be referred for non-invasive angiography with multi-slice CT? , 2007, International journal of cardiology.

[20]  Werner Bautz,et al.  Influence of heart rate on the diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system , 2006, European Radiology.

[22]  J. Paul,et al.  Low-kilovoltage multi-detector row chest CT in adults: feasibility and effect on image quality and iodine dose. , 2004, Radiology.

[23]  The revival of step-and-shoot computed tomography coronary angiography: benefits and open questions. , 2008, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[24]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. , 2008, Radiology.

[25]  Jörg Hausleiter,et al.  Radiation Dose Estimates From Cardiac Multislice Computed Tomography in Daily Practice: Impact of Different Scanning Protocols on Effective Dose Estimates , 2006, Circulation.

[26]  R. Frye,et al.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. , 1975, Circulation.

[27]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation , 2002, European Radiology.

[28]  H. Klepzig Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multi-slice CT-coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease. , 2008, European heart journal.

[29]  D. Dey,et al.  Predicting success of prospective and retrospective gating with dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography: development of selection criteria and initial experience. , 2008, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[30]  Gabriel P Krestin,et al.  64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with high, intermediate, or low pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[31]  Stephan Achenbach,et al.  Computed tomography coronary angiography. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[32]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Step-and-shoot data acquisition and reconstruction for cardiac x-ray computed tomography. , 2006, Medical physics.