Vessel asymmetry as an additional diagnostic tool in the assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture is believed to occur when the local mechanical stress exceeds the local mechanical strength of the wall tissue. On the basis of this hypothesis, the knowledge of the stress acting on the wall of an unruptured aneurysm could be useful in determining the risk of rupture. The role of asymmetry has previously been identified in idealized AAA models and is now studied using realistic AAAs in the current work. METHODS Fifteen patient-specific AAAs were studied to estimate the relationship between wall stress and geometrical parameters. Three-dimensional AAA models were reconstructed from computed tomography scan data. The stress distribution on the AAA wall was evaluated by the finite element method, and peak wall stress was compared with both diameter and centerline asymmetry. A simple method of determining asymmetry was adapted and developed. Statistical analyses were performed to determine potential significance of results. RESULTS Mean von Mises peak wall stress +/- standard deviation was 0.4505 +/- 0.14 MPa (range, 0.3157-0.9048 MPa). Posterior wall stress increases with anterior centerline asymmetry. Peak stress increased by 48% and posterior wall stress by 38% when asymmetry was introduced into a realistic AAA model. CONCLUSION The relationship between posterior wall stress and AAA asymmetry showed that excessive bulging of one surface results in elevated wall stress on the opposite surface. Assessing the degree of bulging and asymmetry that is experienced in an individual AAA may be of benefit to surgeons in the decision-making process and may provide a useful adjunct to diameter as a surgical intervention guide.

[1]  Mark F Fillinger,et al.  Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: wall stress versus diameter. , 2003, Journal of vascular surgery.

[2]  Yannis Papaharilaou,et al.  A decoupled fluid structure approach for estimating wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  Barry J Doyle,et al.  A comparison of modelling techniques for computing wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms , 2007, Biomedical engineering online.

[4]  Clement Kleinstreuer,et al.  Analysis and computer program for rupture-risk prediction of abdominal aortic aneurysms , 2006, Biomedical engineering online.

[5]  M. L. Raghavan,et al.  Introduction to biomechanics related to endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2005, Techniques in vascular and interventional radiology.

[6]  D. Brewster,et al.  Autopsy Study of Unoperated Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: The Case for Early Resection , 1977, Circulation.

[7]  P Grace,et al.  3-D numerical simulation of blood flow through models of the human aorta. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[8]  David A. Vorp,et al.  Potential influence of intraluminal thrombus on abdominal aortic aneurysm as assessed by a new non-invasive method. , 1996, Cardiovascular surgery.

[9]  M. Webster,et al.  Effect of intraluminal thrombus on wall stress in patient-specific models of abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[10]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  Quantification of Three-Dimensional Motion of the Renal Arteries Using Image-Based Modeling Techniques , 2007 .

[11]  David A. Vorp,et al.  In Vivo Three-Dimensional Surface Geometry of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms , 1999, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Mark F Fillinger,et al.  In vivo analysis of mechanical wall stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[13]  T. Hatakeyama,et al.  Risk factors for rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm based on three-dimensional study. , 2001, Journal of vascular surgery.

[14]  David A. Vorp,et al.  Towards A Noninvasive Method for Determination of Patient-Specific Wall Strength Distribution in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Alexander D. Shkolnik,et al.  Fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms: effects of asymmetry and wall thickness , 2005, Biomedical engineering online.

[16]  G. Giannakoulas,et al.  Predicting the Risk of Rupture of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms by Utilizing Various Geometrical Parameters: Revisiting the Diameter Criterion , 2006, Angiology.

[17]  David A. Vorp,et al.  Mechanical wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysm: influence of diameter and asymmetry. , 1998, Journal of vascular surgery.

[18]  R. Sayers.  Aortic aneurysms, inflammatory pathways and nitric oxide. , 2002, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[19]  D. Vorp,et al.  Biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  S. Nicholls,et al.  Rupture in small abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 1998, Journal of vascular surgery.

[21]  Jonathan P Vande Geest,et al.  Biomechanical determinants of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. , 2005, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[22]  T. McGloughlin,et al.  Experimental Assessment of Stress Patterns in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms using the Photoelastic Method , 2004 .

[23]  N. Cheshire,et al.  Fluid structure interaction of patient specific abdominal aortic aneurysms: a comparison with solid stress models , 2006, Biomedical engineering online.

[24]  M L Raghavan,et al.  Toward a biomechanical tool to evaluate rupture potential of abdominal aortic aneurysm: identification of a finite strain constitutive model and evaluation of its applicability. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  D. Vorp,et al.  3D reconstruction and manufacture of real abdominal aortic aneurysms: from CT scan to silicone model. , 2008, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[26]  Frans N van de Vosse,et al.  Effects of wall calcifications in patient-specific wall stress analyses of abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2007, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[27]  M. Webster,et al.  Wall stress distribution on three-dimensionally reconstructed models of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2000, Journal of vascular surgery.

[28]  J. Blankensteijn,et al.  Wall stress analysis in small asymptomatic, symptomatic and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2007, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[29]  Ender A. Finol,et al.  Compliant biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysms: A fluid-structure interaction study , 2007 .

[30]  M J Fagan,et al.  A comparative study of aortic wall stress using finite element analysis for ruptured and non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2004, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[31]  A. Perillo-Marcone,et al.  Effect of varus/valgus malalignment on bone strains in the proximal tibia after TKR: an explicit finite element study. , 2007, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[32]  Francis Robicsek,et al.  Wall Stress Studies of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in a Clinical Model , 2001, Annals of vascular surgery.

[33]  Madhavan L Raghavan,et al.  Regional distribution of wall thickness and failure properties of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.