Errors associated with the use of adaptive differential pulse code modulation in the compression of isometric and dynamic myo-electric signals

Muscle activity produces an electrical signal termed the myo-electric signal (MES). The MES is a useful clinical tool, used in diagnostics and rehabilitation. This signal is typically stored in 2 bytes as 12-bit data, sampled at 3 kHz, resulting in a 6 kbyte s−1 storage requirement. Processing MES data requires large bit manipulations and heavy memory storage requirements. Adaptive differential pulse code modulation (ADPCM) is a popular and successful compression technique for speech. Its application to MES would reduce 12-bit data to a 4-bit representation, providing a 3∶1 compression. As, in most practical applications, memory is organised in bytes, the realisable compression is 4∶1, as pairs of data can be stored in a single byte. The performance of the ADPCM compression technique, using a real-time system at 1 kHz, 2 kHz and 4 kHz sampling rates, is evaluated. The data used include MES from both isometric and dynamic contractions. The percent residual difference (PRD) between an unprocessed and processed MES is used as a performance measure. Errors in computed parameters, such as median frequency and variance, which are used in clinical diagnostics, and waveform features employed in prosthetic control are also used to evaluate the system. The results of the study demonstrate that the ADPCM compression technique is an excellent solution for relieving the data storage requirements of MES both in isometric and dynamic situations.

[1]  Bernard Hudgins,et al.  Intelligent ambulatory monitor for the collection of biomechanical data from within the workplace , 1995 .

[2]  Kazuya Matsumoto,et al.  A Novel Ion Imager for Secondary Ion Mass , 1993 .

[3]  R N Scott Myoelectric control of prostheses. , 1966, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  C. D. De Luca,et al.  Frequency Parameters of the Myoelectric Signal as a Measure of Muscle Conduction Velocity , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  R. Merletti,et al.  Analogue and digital instruments for non-invasive estimation of muscle fibre conduction velocity , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[6]  R.N. Scott,et al.  A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  J. F. Norris,et al.  Real-time compression of myoelectric data utilising adaptive differential pulse code modulation , 1995, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[8]  J. S. Leedham,et al.  Force-length, torque-angle and EMG-joint angle relationships of the human in vivo biceps brachii , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.