Three Approaches to Using Lengthy Ordinal Scales in Structural Equation Models
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Mark Shevlin,et al. Summated rating scales. A Monte Carlo investigation of the effects of reliability and collinearity in regression models , 1997 .
[2] R. Hambleton,et al. Fundamentals of Item Response Theory , 1991 .
[3] R. Lennox,et al. Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. , 1991 .
[4] James C. Anderson,et al. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .
[5] Thomas D. Fletcher,et al. The Effects of Parcels and Latent Variable Scores on the Detection of Interactions in Structural Equation Modeling , 2005 .
[6] Louis Guttman,et al. THE DETERMINACY OF FACTOR SCORE MATRICES WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR FIVE OTHER BASIC PROBLEMS OF COMMON‐FACTOR THEORY1 , 1955 .
[7] Keith F Widaman,et al. Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.
[8] R P McDonald,et al. Latent Traits and the Possibility of Motion. , 1996, Multivariate behavioral research.
[9] H W Marsh,et al. Is More Ever Too Much? The Number of Indicators per Factor in Confirmatory Factor Analysis. , 1998, Multivariate behavioral research.
[10] Patrick S Malone,et al. A 12-Year Prospective Study of Patterns of Social Information Processing Problems and Externalizing Behaviors , 2006, Journal of abnormal child psychology.
[11] T. Little,et al. To Parcel or Not to Parcel: Exploring the Question, Weighing the Merits , 2002 .
[12] Rosalie J. Hall,et al. Item Parceling Strategies in SEM: Investigating the Subtle Effects of Unmodeled Secondary Constructs , 1999 .
[13] Willem E. Saris,et al. Alternative approaches to structural modeling of ordinal data: A Monte Carlo study , 1997 .
[14] Scott L. Hershberger,et al. The New Rules of Measurement : What Every Psychologist and Educator Should Know , 1999 .
[15] Raymond B. Cattell,et al. The Radial Parcel Double Factoring Design: A Solution to the Item-Vs-Parcel Controversy , 1975 .
[16] G. Goude,et al. On fundamental measurement in psychology , 1962 .
[17] Daniel A. Sass,et al. The Effects of Parceling Unidimensional Scales on Structural Parameter Estimates in Structural Equation Modeling , 2006 .
[18] B. Muthén,et al. How to Use a Monte Carlo Study to Decide on Sample Size and Determine Power , 2002 .
[19] T. Achenbach. The Child Behavior Profile: I. Boys aged 6--11. , 1978, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.
[20] Tamara Halle,et al. Scaling Back Survey Scales , 2002 .
[21] D. Bandalos. The Effects of Item Parceling on Goodness-of-Fit and Parameter Estimate Bias in Structural Equation Modeling , 2002 .
[22] Herbert W. Marsh,et al. Self Description Questionnaire III: The construct validity of multidimensional self-concept ratings by late adolescents. , 1984 .
[23] Fadia Nasser,et al. A Monte Carlo Study Investigating the Impact of Item Parceling on Measures of Fit in Confirmatory Factor Analysis , 2003 .
[24] G. Freytag. [CORRELATION AND CAUSALITY]. , 1964, Psychiatrie, Neurologie, und medizinische Psychologie.
[25] S. Embretson,et al. Item response theory for psychologists , 2000 .
[26] F. Samejima. Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores , 1968 .
[27] Keith F. Widaman,et al. Unidimensional Versus Domain Representative Parceling of Questionnaire Items: An Empirical Example , 1994 .
[28] T. Little,et al. On selecting indicators for multivariate measurement and modeling with latent variables: When "good" indicators are bad and "bad" indicators are good. , 1999 .
[29] R. Cattell,et al. Validation and intensification of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire. , 1956, Journal of clinical psychology.
[30] H. Marsh,et al. The use of item parcels in structural equation modelling: non-normal data and small sample sizes. , 2004, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.
[31] Kenneth A. Bollen,et al. Monte Carlo Experiments: Design and Implementation , 2001 .
[32] S. Reise,et al. Parameter Recovery in the Graded Response Model Using MULTILOG , 1990 .
[33] Pere J. Ferrando,et al. Difficulty, Discrimination, and Information Indices in the Linear Factor Analysis Model for Continuous Item Responses , 2009 .
[34] B. Muthén. A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators , 1984 .
[35] J. Wisenbaker,et al. A Monte Carlo Study Investigating the Impact of Item Parceling Strategies on Parameter Estimates and Their Standard Errors in CFA , 2006 .
[36] Michael D Slater,et al. Brief measures of sensation seeking for screening and large-scale surveys. , 2003, Drug and alcohol dependence.
[37] Jan de Leeuw,et al. On the relationship between item response theory and factor analysis of discretized variables , 1987 .
[38] B. Muthén,et al. A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non‐normal Likert variables: A note on the size of the model , 1992 .
[39] Susan E. Embretson,et al. Item Response Theory Models and Spurious Interaction Effects in Factorial ANOVA Designs , 1996 .
[40] S. Finney,et al. Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling , 2001 .
[41] B. Muthén,et al. A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non‐normal Likert variables , 1985 .