When and why do non-neutral metacommunities appear neutral?

Hubbell's neutral theory assumes that all species in a community have the same per capita fitness. Despite the overwhelming evidence against this assumption in most communities the neutral theory has often been, though not always, successful at predicting patterns of diversity in nature. I analyze a non-neutral model in order to suggest conditions under which observed species-abundance distributions (SADs) could be expected to resemble neutral distributions. The non-neutral model consists of two guilds of species such that (1) individuals between guilds do not interact, (2) dynamics within guilds follow Hubbell's model and (3) neutral parameters between guilds differ. This two-guild model generates SADs that appear neutral in some cases and clearly non-neutral in other cases. This result suggests that SADs may be more informative about niche structure than previously thought. The two-guild model could be tested in communities composed of fairly well-defined guilds or functional groups.

[1]  G. Quinn,et al.  Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists , 2002 .

[2]  S. Hurlbert.  The Nonconcept of Species Diversity: A Critique and Alternative Parameters. , 1971, Ecology.

[3]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Community Patterns in Source‐Sink Metacommunities , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[4]  J. Jensen.  Sur les fonctions convexes et les inégalités entre les valeurs moyennes , 1906 .

[5]  P. Chesson.  Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[6]  E. H. Simpson.  Measurement of Diversity , 1949, Nature.

[7]  Douglas H. Erwin,et al.  Dynamic response of Permian brachiopod communities to long-term environmental change , 2004, Nature.

[8]  R. Poulin.  Parasites and the neutral theory of biodiversity , 2004 .

[9]  Jeffrey S. Rosenthal,et al.  Probability and Statistics: The Science of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[10]  John H. Lawton,et al.  The Ecological Consequences of Shared Natural Enemies , 1994 .

[11]  Rampal S Etienne,et al.  A dispersal-limited sampling theory for species and alleles. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[12]  A. Magurran,et al.  Measuring Biological Diversity , 2004 .

[13]  Rampal S. Etienne,et al.  A new sampling formula for neutral biodiversity , 2005 .

[14]  S. Pacala,et al.  Ecological drift in niche-structured communities: neutral pattern does not imply neutral process , 2005 .

[15]  V. Savage,et al.  Improved approximations to scaling relationships for species, populations, and ecosystems across latitudinal and elevational gradients. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  R. Macarthur.  Species packing and competitive equilibrium for many species. , 1970, Theoretical population biology.

[17]  W. Lewis.  DYNAMICS AND SUCCESSION OF THE PHYTOPLANKTON IN A TROPICAL LAKE: LAKE LANAO, PHILIPPINES , 1978 .

[18]  G. F. Gause.  The struggle for existence , 1971 .

[19]  Jonathan M. Chase.  Towards a really unified theory for metacommunities , 2005 .

[20]  S. Nee.  The neutral theory of biodiversity: do the numbers add up? , 2005 .

[21]  B. McGill.  A test of the unified neutral theory of biodiversity , 2003, Nature.

[22]  S. Engen,et al.  Stochastic abundance models. , 1978 .

[23]  Han Olff,et al.  A novel genealogical approach to neutral biodiversity theory , 2004 .

[24]  R. Lande.  Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities , 1996 .

[25]  Steven C. Walker,et al.  Testing the standard neutral model of biodiversity in lake communities , 2007 .

[26]  P. Chesson,et al.  A need for niches? , 1991, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Neutral theory and relative species abundance in ecology , 2003, Nature.

[28]  Burslem,et al.  Biotic Interactions in the Tropics , 2005 .

[29]  D. Tilman.  Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[30]  S. Levin,et al.  Comparing Classical Community Models: Theoretical Consequences for Patterns of Diversity , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[31]  S. Hubbell,et al.  The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography at age ten. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  W. Ewens.  The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles. , 1972, Theoretical population biology.

[33]  R. Whittaker.  Evolution and measurement of species diversity , 1972 .

[34]  Jérôme Chave,et al.  Neutral theory and community ecology , 2004 .

[35]  H. Olff,et al.  How Dispersal Limitation Shapes Species–Body Size Distributions in Local Communities , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[36]  R. Ricklefs,et al.  A comment on Hubbell's zero‐sum ecological drift model , 2003 .

[37]  Steinar Engen,et al.  POPULATION DYNAMIC MODELS GENERATING SPECIES ABUNDANCE DISTRIBUTIONS OF THE GAMMA TYPE , 1996 .

[38]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  A world without competition , 2001, Nature.

[39]  G. Bell,et al.  The interpretation of biological surveys , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  A. Townsend Peterson,et al.  The Fallacy of Averages , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[41]  Dominique Gravel,et al.  Reconciling niche and neutrality: the continuum hypothesis. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[42]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology , 2004 .

[43]  Colin S. Reynolds,et al.  The ecology of freshwater phytoplankton , 1984 .

[44]  T. Hughes,et al.  Coral reef diversity refutes the neutral theory of biodiversity , 2006, Nature.

[45]  Irene A. Stegun,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions. , 1966 .

[46]  D. Simberloff.  The Guild Concept and the Structure of Ecological Communities , 1991 .

[47]  J. Timothy Wootton,et al.  Field parameterization and experimental test of the neutral theory of biodiversity , 2005, Nature.