Segmenting knowledge management (KM) practitioners and its relationship to performance variation - some empirical evidence

– This paper aims at identifying segments among knowledge management (KM) practitioners and analyzes whether performance varies across these segments. The field of KM aims at enhancing performance through knowledge practitioners. However, not all KM implementations have similar outcomes. , – A literature review is conducted through secondary sources. Based on the themes identified for research, qualitative research through a focus group discussion (FGD) and personal interviews is used to explore the themes. This is used to develop a conceptual KM framework. An instrument is developed which is tested for validity and reliability. The instrument is administered to respondents and 313 responses are obtained. Convenience sampling is used to select the respondents. Further, k-means cluster is used to identify segments among KM practitioners. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test is conducted to determine if the average scores of KM constructs varied between the three clusters. Further, ANOVA test is also used to analyze whether organizational and financial performance scores vary between the three clusters. Post hoc test is used to determine the extent of variation between cluster pairs. , – The results show that the sample comprises three segments which were subsequently labeled as active, partly and passive KM practitioners. It was found that active KM practitioners scored highest on various KM constructs, passive KM practitioners scored the least and partly KM practitioners had scores in between the two. One-way ANOVA results showed that the average scores of KM constructs varied significantly between the three clusters. The results show that a significant difference is found in organizational as well as financial performance between any two cluster pairs. , – The sample comprises 313 respondents, of which around 65 per cent are from services industry and 67 per cent from private sector. A higher representation from public sector and manufacturing industry would have made the comparison more meaningful. The findings are based on data collected from India, and therefore, the results may not be generalizable to all economies. , – The three clusters identified from the sample data may help organizations who have initiated the KM process to benchmark themselves with the obtained clusters and identify the trust areas important to their KM initiative. , – The study builds upon both qualitative methodology through FGD and personal interviews and quantitative methodology through questionnaire and surveys. This comprehensive coverage of KM constructs and identification of respondent clusters is insightful. It also provides researchers useful means to enhance performance through KM within clusters.

[1]  Achara Chandrachai,et al.  Indicators of knowledge management capability for KM effectiveness , 2010 .

[2]  Fátima Guadamillas,et al.  A case study on the implementation of a knowledge management strategy oriented to innovation , 2002 .

[3]  E. Nevis,et al.  Understanding Organizations as Learning Systems , 1995 .

[4]  Cindy Hubert,et al.  Successful KM Implementations: A Study of Best-Practice Organizations , 2003 .

[5]  Karl-Erik Sveiby.  What is Knowledge Management , 2007, WWW 2007.

[6]  Archana Singh,et al.  Knowledge management practices in Indian information technology companies , 2010 .

[7]  Robert D. Smith,et al.  Managing organizational knowledge as a strategic asset , 2001, J. Knowl. Manag..

[8]  K. D. Joshi,et al.  Knowledge Management: A Threefold Framework , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[9]  Nikhil Mehta,et al.  Infosys Technologies: improving organizational knowledge flows , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[10]  Stan Kwiecien,et al.  Driving Knowledge Management at Ford Motor Company , 2003 .

[11]  P. Drucker.  The Age of Social Transformation , 1994 .

[12]  Karl M. Wiig,et al.  What future knowledge management users may expect , 1999, J. Knowl. Manag..

[13]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Knowledge Driven Quality Improvement , 1998 .

[14]  Christine W. Soo,et al.  Knowledge Management: Philosophy, Processes, and Pitfalls , 2002 .

[15]  Heeseok Lee,et al.  An empirical investigation of KM styles and their effect on corporate performance , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[16]  Tom J. M. Mom,et al.  Investigating Managers' Exploration and Exploitation Activities: The Influence of Top-Down, Bottom-Up, and Horizontal Knowledge Inflows , 2006 .

[17]  Ravi Shankar,et al.  Survey of knowledge management practices in Indian manufacturing industries , 2006, J. Knowl. Manag..

[18]  J. Liebowitz.  Key ingredients to the success of an organization's knowledge management strategy , 1999 .

[19]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Some Conceptual and Research Barriers to the Utilization of Knowledge , 1998 .

[20]  Dan Holtshouse.  Knowledge Research Issues , 1998 .

[21]  G. Krogh.  Care in Knowledge Creation , 1998 .

[22]  Pooja Gupta,et al.  Impact of Knowledge Management Practices on Innovative Capacity , 2011 .

[23]  Paul H. J. Hendriks,et al.  Knowledge-based systems and knowledge management: Friends or foes? , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[24]  Liang-Chu Chen,et al.  Can organizational knowledge capabilities affect knowledge sharing behavior? , 2007, J. Inf. Sci..

[25]  Robert J. Hiebeler,et al.  Benchmarking: Knowledge management , 1996 .

[26]  James D. McKeen,et al.  Knowledge management and organizational performance: an exploratory analysis , 2009, J. Knowl. Manag..

[27]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[28]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Creating and Transferring Knowledge for Productivity Improvement in Factories , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[29]  Pervaiz K. Ahmed,et al.  Knowledge management orientation: construct development and empirical validation , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[30]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[31]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[32]  K. Sengupta,et al.  Knowledge management and innovation performance in a high-tech SMEs industry , 2013 .

[33]  S. Chong.  KM Critical Success Factors: A Comparison of Perceived Importance Versus Implementation in Malaysian ICT Companies , 2006 .

[34]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[35]  Timothy R. Hinkin.  A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations , 1995 .

[36]  H. D. Thomas,et al.  SUCCESSFUL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PROJECTS , 1998 .

[37]  Nick Bontis,et al.  A cluster analysis of the KM field , 2009 .

[38]  R. Sitgreaves.  Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[39]  Yi-Hsin Lin,et al.  The effects of industry cluster knowledge management on innovation performance , 2014 .

[40]  Y. Jarrar.  Knowledge management: learning for organisational experience , 2002 .

[41]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  Organizational Memory , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[42]  Shu-Hui Chuang,et al.  A resource-based perspective on knowledge management capability and competitive advantage: an empirical investigation , 2004 .

[43]  Martha de Jager,et al.  The KMAT: benchmarking knowledge management , 1999 .

[44]  R. McDermott.  Why Information Technology Inspired but Cannot Deliver Knowledge Management , 1999 .

[45]  Chung-Jen Chen,et al.  How organizational climate and structure affect knowledge management - The social interaction perspective , 2007, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[46]  Elaine Aspinwall,et al.  Knowledge management implementation frameworks: a review , 2004 .

[47]  W. Orlikowski.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[48]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[49]  Gilbert A. Churchill.  A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[50]  S. K. Chadha,et al.  A Study on Knowledge Management Practices of Auto Component Manufacturing Companies in Ludhiana City , 2010 .

[51]  Rory L. Chase,et al.  The Knowledge-Based Organization: An International Survey , 1997, J. Knowl. Manag..

[52]  Jay Chatzkel,et al.  Establishing a global KM initiative: the Wipro story , 2004, J. Knowl. Manag..

[53]  Kuan Yew Wong,et al.  Critical success factors for implementing knowledge management in small and medium enterprises , 2005, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[54]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[55]  Harry Scarbrough,et al.  Towards a second generation of KM? The people management challenge , 2001 .

[56]  C. Holsapple,et al.  Exploring primary activities of the knowledge chain , 2004 .

[57]  Hüseyin Tanriverdi,et al.  Information Technology Relatedness, Knowledge Management Capability, and Performance of Multibusiness Firms , 2005, MIS Q..

[58]  Shivraj Kanungo,et al.  Modeling Enablers for Successful KM Implementation , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[59]  Heeseok Lee,et al.  Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes, and Organizational Performance: An Integrative View and Empirical Examination , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[60]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Knowledge Management , 2004 .

[61]  Kun Chang Lee,et al.  KMPI: measuring knowledge management performance , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[62]  L. Cronbach.  Essentials of psychological testing , 1960 .

[63]  James M. Sinkula,et al.  A framework for market-based organizational learning: Linking values, knowledge, and behavior , 1997 .