Grating orientation as a measure of tactile spatial acuity.

Recent studies have used grating orientation as a measure of tactile spatial acuity on the fingerpad. In this task subjects identify the orientation of a grooved surface presented in either the proximal-distal or lateral-medial orientation. Other recent results have suggested that there might be a substantial anisotropy on the fingerpad related to spatial sensitivity. This anisotropy was revealed using a task in which subjects discriminated between a smooth and a grooved surface presented at different orientations on the fingerpad. The anisotropy was substantial enough that it might permit subjects to discriminate grating orientation on the basis of intensive rather than spatial cues. The present study examined the possibility that anisotropy on the fingerpad might provide cues in a spatial acuity task. The ability of subjects to discriminate between a smooth and a grooved surface was measured under conditions that are typically used in grating orientation tasks. No evidence of anisotropy was found. Also, using a grating orientation task, separate estimates were made of sensitivity in the proximal-distal and lateral-medial orientations. Again no evidence of anisotropy was found. Consistent with changes in the density of innervation, grating orientation sensitivity was found to vary as a function of location on the fingerpad. The results support the view that grating orientation is a valid measure of spatial acuity reflecting underlying neural, spatial mechanisms.

[1]  R. Johansson,et al.  Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  I. Darian‐Smith,et al.  Innervation density of mechanoreceptive fibres supplying glabrous skin of the monkey's index finger. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  K O Johnson,et al.  Tactile spatial resolution. I. Two-point discrimination, gap detection, grating resolution, and letter recognition. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  K. O. Johnson,et al.  Tactile spatial resolution. II. Neural representation of Bars, edges, and gratings in monkey primary afferents. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Roger W. Cholewiak,et al.  Sensory and Physiological Bases of Touch , 1991 .

[6]  I. Summers.  Tactile Aids for the Hearing Impaired , 1992 .

[7]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors to the shape of objects applied to the primate fingerpad. , 1993, Acta psychologica.

[8]  J. Craig.  Anomalous sensations following prolonged tactile stimulation , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  K. O. Johnson,et al.  Evaluation of the relative roles of slowly and rapidly adapting afferent fibers in roughness perception. , 1994, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[10]  K O Johnson,et al.  The limit of tactile spatial resolution in humans , 1994, Neurology.

[11]  K. O. Johnson,et al.  A psychophysical study of the mechanisms of sensory recovery following nerve injury in humans. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  Matthew Q. Patterson,et al.  Dimensions of spatial acuity in the touch sense: changes over the life span. , 1995, Somatosensory & motor research.

[13]  Paul Bach-y-Rita,et al.  Tactile displays , 1995 .

[14]  J C Stevens,et al.  Spatial acuity of the body surface over the life span. , 1996, Somatosensory & motor research.

[15]  A. Goodwin,et al.  Representation of the shape and contact force of handled objects in populations of cutaneous afferents , 1996 .

[16]  Emerson Foulke,et al.  Tactile acuity, aging, and braille reading in long-term blindness , 1996 .

[17]  M J Farah,et al.  Tactile agnosia. Underlying impairment and implications for normal tactile object recognition. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  S. Bolanowski,et al.  The Psychophysics of Tactile Perception and its Peripheral Physiological Basis , 1996 .

[19]  Edward A. Essock,et al.  Superior sensitivity for tactile stimuli oriented proximally-distally on the finger : Implications for mixed class 1 and class 2 anisotropies , 1997 .

[20]  M. R. DeLong,et al.  Tactile spatial acuity and roughness discrimination: Impairments due to aging and Parkinson's disease , 1997, Neurology.

[21]  G. Essick,et al.  Utility of square-wave gratings to assess perioral spatial acuity. , 1997, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[22]  J. Craig,et al.  Factors affecting tactile spatial acuity. , 1998, Somatosensory & motor research.