Time-domain finite element models of electrochemistry in intracochlear electrodes

Most neural prostheses feature metallic electrodes to act as an interface between the device and the physiological tissue. When charge is injected through these electrodes, potentially harmful reactions may result. Others have developed finite element models to evaluate the performance of stimulating electrodes in vivo. Few however, model an electrode-electrolyte interface, and many do not address electrode corrosion and safety concerns with respect to irreversible reactions. In this work, we successfully develop a time domain finite element model of cochlear implant electrodes that incorporate oxygen reduction and platinum oxidation reactions. We find that when electrodes are stimulated with current pulses (0.5 mA, 25 μs), faradaic reactions may cause an increase in the peripheral enhancement of the current density.

[1]  Douglas B. Shire,et al.  Contribution of Oxygen Reduction to Charge Injection on Platinum and Sputtered Iridium Oxide Neural Stimulation Electrodes , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  James D. Weiland,et al.  Dynamic Current Density of the Disk Electrode Double-Layer , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  E. T. McAdams,et al.  Harmonic analysis of low-frequency bioelectrode behavior , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  A. Sadkowski Time domain responses of constant phase electrodes , 1993 .

[5]  Derek Pletcher,et al.  A study of cathodic oxygen reduction at platinum using microelectrodes , 1993 .

[6]  R.V. Shannon,et al.  A model of safe levels for electrical stimulation , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  T.L. Rose,et al.  Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes. VIII. Electrochemically safe charge injection limits with 0.2 ms pulses (neuronal application) , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  C.T.M. Choi,et al.  Incorporating the Electrode-Tissue Interface to Cochlear Implant Models , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[9]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Tissue and electrode capacitance reduce neural activation volumes during deep brain stimulation , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  James D. Weiland,et al.  Reduction of current density at disk electrode periphery by shaping current pulse edges , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[11]  J. Newman Resistance for Flow of Current to a Disk , 1966 .

[12]  S. B. Brummer,et al.  Electrochemical Considerations for Safe Electrical Stimulation of the Nervous System with Platinum Electrodes , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Sébastien Joucla,et al.  Modeling extracellular electrical neural stimulation: From basic understanding to MEA-based applications , 2012, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[14]  Filiep Vanpoucke,et al.  Identification of the impedance model of an implanted cochlear prosthesis from intracochlear potential measurements , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  J. Mortimer,et al.  Platinum for neural stimulation: voltammetry considerations , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[16]  Allen Taflove,et al.  Incorporation of the electrode–electrolyte interface into finite-element models of metal microelectrodes , 2008, Journal of neural engineering.