Determining the most significant input parameters in models of subendocardial ischaemia and their effect on ST segment epicardial potential distributions

There is considerable interest in simulating ischaemia in the ventricle and its effect on the electrocardiogram, because a better understanding of the connection between the two may lead to improvements in diagnosis of myocardial ischaemia. In this work we studied subendocardial ischaemia, in a simplified half-ellipsoidal bidomain model of a ventricle, and its effect on ST segment epicardial potential distributions (EPDs). We found that the EPD changed as the ischaemic depth increased, from a single minimum (min1) over the ischaemic region to a maximum (max) there, with min1 over the border of the region. Lastly, a second minimum (min2) developed on the opposite side of the ischaemic region, in addition to min1 and max. We replicated these results in a realistic ventricular model and showed that the min1 only case could be found for ischaemic depths of up to around 35% of the ventricular wall. In addition, we systematically examined the sensitivity of EPD parameters, such as the potentials and positions of min1, max and min2, to various inputs to the half-ellipsoidal model, such as fibre rotation angle, ischaemic depth and conductivities. We found that the EPD parameters were not sensitive to the blood or transverse bidomain conductivities and were most sensitive to either ischaemic depth and/or fibre rotation angle. This allowed us to conclude that the asynchronous development of the two minima might provide a way of distinguishing between low and high thickness subendocardial ischaemia, and that this method may well be valid despite variability in the population.

[1]  D Kilpatrick,et al.  Source of electrocardiographic ST changes in subendocardial ischemia. , 1998, Circulation research.

[2]  J. Stinstra,et al.  The Effect of Conductivity on ST-Segment Epicardial Potentials Arising from Subendocardial Ischemia , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Barbara M. Johnston,et al.  Quantifying the effect of uncertainty in input parameters in a simplified bidomain model of partial thickness ischaemia , 2017, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[4]  Jeremy E. Oakley,et al.  Bayesian sensitivity analysis of a nonlinear finite element model , 2012 .

[5]  G. E. Newman,et al.  Significance of subendocardial S-T segment elevation caused by coronary stenosis in the dog. Epicardial S-T segment depression, local ischemia and subsequent necrosis. , 1977, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  J. Stinstra,et al.  On the Passive Cardiac Conductivity , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  T. Opthof,et al.  Injury current and gradients of diastolic stimulation threshold, TQ potential, and extracellular potassium concentration during acute regional ischemia in the isolated perfused pig heart. , 1991, Circulation research.

[8]  Peter R. Johnston,et al.  Cardiac conductivity values — A challenge for experimentalists? , 2011, 2011 8th International Symposium on Noninvasive Functional Source Imaging of the Brain and Heart and the 2011 8th International Conference on Bioelectromagnetism.

[9]  E. Sobie Parameter sensitivity analysis in electrophysiological models using multivariable regression. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[10]  Peter R Johnston,et al.  A finite volume method solution for the bidomain equations and their application to modelling cardiac ischaemia , 2010, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[11]  Darrell Swenson,et al.  Spatial organization of acute myocardial ischemia. , 2016, Journal of electrocardiology.

[12]  Peter R. Johnston,et al.  The effect of conductivity values on ST segment shift in subendocardial ischaemia , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Mark Potse,et al.  The role of extracellular potassium transport in computer models of the ischemic zone , 2007, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[14]  B. Kowalski,et al.  Partial least-squares regression: a tutorial , 1986 .

[15]  Barbara M. Johnston,et al.  The Sensitivity of the Passive Bidomain Equation to Variations in Six Conductivity Values , 2013, BioMed 2013.

[16]  J. Stinstra,et al.  Evaluating the Effects of Border Zone Approximations with Subject Specific Ischemia Models , 2009 .

[17]  Bruce H Smaill,et al.  Laminar Arrangement of Ventricular Myocytes Influences Electrical Behavior of the Heart , 2007, Circulation research.

[18]  Mark Strong,et al.  Bayesian Sensitivity Analysis of a Cardiac Cell Model Using a Gaussian Process Emulator , 2015, PloS one.

[19]  R. Cardinal,et al.  ST elevation or depression in subendocardial ischemia? , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[20]  A Study of the Dynamics of Cardiac Ischemia using Experimental and Modeling Approaches , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[21]  Jeroen G Stinstra,et al.  Mechanism for ST Depression Associated with Contiguous Subendocardial Ischemia , 2004, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[22]  B. Roth Electrical conductivity values used with the bidomain model of cardiac tissue , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  R. Coronel,et al.  The effect of lesion size and tissue remodeling on ST deviation in partial-thickness ischemia. , 2007, Heart rhythm.

[24]  L. Clerc Directional differences of impulse spread in trabecular muscle from mammalian heart. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  P. C. Franzone,et al.  Spreading of excitation in 3-D models of the anisotropic cardiac tissue. I. Validation of the eikonal model. , 1993, Mathematical biosciences.