Pulmonary emphysema: effect of lung volume on objective quantification at thin-section CT.

PURPOSE To prospectively investigate the effect of submaximal inspiration on computed tomographic (CT) indexes used to quantify emphysema and to discriminate between effects of lung tissue loss and increase in total lung capacity (TLC) on these indexes. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this ethical committee-approved study, 20 control subjects and 16 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who provided written informed consent were included. Three 1-mm-thick sections were obtained from each participant at 100%, 90%, 80%, 70%, and 50% of vital capacity (VC). At each volume, eight percentiles of attenuation distribution, as well as relative area (RA) of lung occupied by attenuation coefficients lower than nine thresholds, were calculated. A linear regression line between TLC and each CT index was plotted for control subjects. Mean distance from data points measured in patients with COPD to the normal regression line was used to reflect the effect of lung tissue loss, regardless of TLC. RESULTS The RA of lung occupied by attenuation coefficients lower than -950 HU (RA(950)) at any percentage of VC lower than 100% decreased significantly from that at 100% VC (P ≤ .002) in control subjects and patients with COPD; however, between 100% VC and 90% VC, the average difference in RA(950) was only 3% and 2% in control subjects and patients with COPD, respectively. The 1st percentile at any percentage of VC lower than 100% increased from that at 100% VC (P < .001) in control subjects. This percentile did not significantly differ from 100% VC at 90% VC or 80% VC (P = .176 and P = 0.077, respectively), but it did significantly differ from 100% VC at 70% VC and 50% VC (P ≤ .002 for both) in patients with COPD. Slope and mean distance were different from zero for all RAs and percentiles except for mean distance for RAs between RA(900) and RA(920). CONCLUSION Submaximal inspiration induces underestimation of pulmonary emphysema. Both lung tissue loss and TLC influence CT indexes, suggesting the need to establish normal CT values.

[1]  P. Gevenois,et al.  The effects of age, sex, lung size, and hyperinflation on CT lung densitometry. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  P De Vuyst,et al.  Pulmonary emphysema: quantitative CT during expiration. , 1996, Radiology.

[3]  J. Stolk,et al.  Pulmonary stem cells and the induction of tissue regeneration in the treatment of emphysema , 2007, International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

[4]  D. Lynch,et al.  Quantitative computed tomography detects air trapping due to asthma. , 1994, Chest.

[5]  E. Russi,et al.  Functional and morphological heterogeneity of emphysema and its implication for selection of patients for lung volume reduction surgery. , 1999, The European respiratory journal.

[6]  M. Mascalchi,et al.  Spirometrically gated high-resolution CT findings in COPD: lung attenuation vs lung function and dyspnea severity. , 2006, Chest.

[7]  J. Best,et al.  DIAGNOSIS OF PULMONARY EMPHYSEMA BY COMPUTERISED TOMOGRAPHY , 1984, The Lancet.

[8]  P. Gevenois,et al.  Quantitative computed tomography assessment of lung structure and function in pulmonary emphysema. , 2001, The European respiratory journal.

[9]  A A Bankier,et al.  Pulmonary emphysema: subjective visual grading versus objective quantification with macroscopic morphometry and thin-section CT densitometry. , 1999, Radiology.

[10]  R M Slone,et al.  Repeatability of quantitative CT indexes of emphysema in patients evaluated for lung volume reduction surgery. , 2001, Radiology.

[11]  J. Roca,et al.  Standardization of the measurement of transfer factor (diffusing capacity) , 1993, European Respiratory Journal.

[12]  Richard Beasley,et al.  Utility of lung density measurements in the diagnosis of emphysema. , 2007, Respiratory medicine.

[13]  J E Cotes,et al.  Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows , 1993, European Respiratory Journal.

[14]  W. Kalender,et al.  Semiautomatic evaluation procedures for quantitative CT of the lung. , 1991, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[15]  P. Gevenois,et al.  Pulmonary emphysema: objective quantification at multi-detector row CT--comparison with macroscopic and microscopic morphometry. , 2006, Radiology.

[16]  E Kohda,et al.  Longitudinal follow-up study of smoking-induced lung density changes by high-resolution computed tomography. , 2000, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[17]  Walter Huda,et al.  Converting dose-length product to effective dose at CT. , 2008, Radiology.

[18]  P De Vuyst,et al.  Comparison of computed density and macroscopic morphometry in pulmonary emphysema. , 1995, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[19]  R H Hruban,et al.  High resolution computed tomography of inflation-fixed lungs. Pathologic-radiologic correlation of centrilobular emphysema. , 1987, The American review of respiratory disease.

[20]  J E Cotes,et al.  Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Report Working Party Standardization of Lung Function Tests, European Community for Steel and Coal. Official Statement of the European Respiratory Society. , 1993, The European respiratory journal. Supplement.

[21]  J. Best,et al.  CT measurements of lung density in life can quantitate distal airspace enlargement--an essential defining feature of human emphysema. , 1988, The American review of respiratory disease.

[22]  R. Pellegrino,et al.  Mechanical response to methacholine and deep inspiration in supine men. , 2007, Journal of applied physiology.

[23]  J. Best,et al.  Lung CT density correlates with measurements of airflow limitation and the diffusing capacity. , 1991, The European respiratory journal.

[24]  N. Müller,et al.  "Density mask". An objective method to quantitate emphysema using computed tomography. , 1988, Chest.

[25]  W A Kalender,et al.  Measurement of pulmonary parenchymal attenuation: use of spirometric gating with quantitative CT. , 1990, Radiology.

[26]  M. Estenne,et al.  Variability in lung elasticity measurements in normal humans. , 1983, The American review of respiratory disease.

[27]  The definition of emphysema. Report of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Division of Lung Diseases workshop. , 1985, The American review of respiratory disease.

[28]  A. Bankier,et al.  Quality initiatives. Respiratory instructions for CT examinations of the lungs: a hands-on guide. , 2008, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[29]  J. V. van Engelshoven,et al.  Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: evaluation with spirometrically controlled CT lung densitometry. , 1994, Radiology.

[30]  P De Vuyst,et al.  Comparison of computed density and microscopic morphometry in pulmonary emphysema. , 1996, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.