Effect of edge pruning on structural controllability and observability of complex networks

Controllability and observability of complex systems are vital concepts in many fields of science. The network structure of the system plays a crucial role in determining its controllability and observability. Because most naturally occurring complex systems show dynamic changes in their network connectivity, it is important to understand how perturbations in the connectivity affect the controllability of the system. To this end, we studied the control structure of different types of artificial, social and biological neuronal networks (BNN) as their connections were progressively pruned using four different pruning strategies. We show that the BNNs are more similar to scale-free networks than to small-world networks, when comparing the robustness of their control structure to structural perturbations. We introduce a new graph descriptor, ‘the cardinality curve’, to quantify the robustness of the control structure of a network to progressive edge pruning. Knowing the susceptibility of control structures to different pruning methods could help design strategies to destroy the control structures of dangerous networks such as epidemic networks. On the other hand, it could help make useful networks more resistant to edge attacks.

[1]  Jan van Leeuwen,et al.  Diameter increase caused by edge deletion , 1987, J. Graph Theory.

[2]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Learning to Discover Social Circles in Ego Networks , 2012, NIPS.

[3]  Ching-tai Lin.  Structural controllability , 1974 .

[4]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[5]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Graph evolution: Densification and shrinking diameters , 2006, TKDD.

[6]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[7]  I. Ispolatov,et al.  Duplication-divergence model of protein interaction network. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Observability of complex systems , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Bin Zhang,et al.  Structural Controllability of Complex Networks Based on Preferential Matching , 2013, PloS one.

[10]  Stefan Rotter,et al.  How Structure Determines Correlations in Neuronal Networks , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[11]  K. Svoboda,et al.  Experience-dependent plasticity of dendritic spines in the developing rat barrel cortex in vivo , 2000, Nature.

[12]  S. Safra,et al.  On the hardness of approximating minimum vertex cover , 2005 .

[13]  Ginestra Bianconi,et al.  Network controllability is determined by the density of low in-degree and out-degree nodes. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[14]  R. Kálmán.  Mathematical description of linear dynamical systems , 1963 .

[15]  John Skvoretz,et al.  Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[16]  B. Hyman,et al.  Alzheimer's disease: synapses gone cold , 2011, Molecular Neurodegeneration.

[17]  D. O'Leary.  Development of connectional diversity and specificity in the mammalian brain by the pruning of collateral projections , 1992, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[18]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[19]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Signed networks in social media , 2010, CHI.

[20]  Pak Ching Li,et al.  Variations of the maximum leaf spanning tree problem for bipartite graphs , 2006, Inf. Process. Lett..

[21]  Y. Lai,et al.  Optimizing controllability of complex networks by minimum structural perturbations. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  D. Modha,et al.  Network architecture of the long-distance pathways in the macaque brain , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Shilpa Chakravartula,et al.  Complex Networks: Structure and Dynamics , 2014 .

[24]  Alexandros Goulas,et al.  Is the brain really a small-world network? , 2015, Brain Structure and Function.

[25]  A. Vázquez.  Growing network with local rules: preferential attachment, clustering hierarchy, and degree correlations. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[26]  Vijay V. Vazirani,et al.  Maximum Matchings in General Graphs Through Randomization , 1989, J. Algorithms.

[27]  Takeaki Uno,et al.  Algorithms for Enumerating All Perfect, Maximum and Maximal Matchings in Bipartite Graphs , 1997, ISAAC.

[28]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  The dynamics of viral marketing , 2005, EC '06.

[29]  Cunlai Pu,et al.  Robustness analysis of network controllability , 2012 .

[30]  Ian T. Foster,et al.  Mapping the Gnutella Network: Macroscopic Properties of Large-Scale Peer-to-Peer Systems , 2002, IPTPS.

[31]  D. Long.  Networks of the Brain , 2011 .

[32]  P. Caroni,et al.  Structural plasticity upon learning: regulation and functions , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[33]  J. Winn,et al.  Brain , 1878, The Lancet.

[34]  Arvind Kumar,et al.  The High-Conductance State of Cortical Networks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[35]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Controllability of complex networks , 2011, Nature.

[36]  A. Destexhe,et al.  Brain networks: small-worlds, after all? , 2014 .

[37]  C. Stam,et al.  Small-world networks and functional connectivity in Alzheimer's disease. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[38]  Michelle Rudolph-Lilith,et al.  Algebraic approach to small-world network models. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[39]  Jurgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization in complex networks , 2008, 0805.2976.

[40]  B. Barres,et al.  The complement system: an unexpected role in synaptic pruning during development and disease. , 2012, Annual review of neuroscience.

[41]  Arvind Kumar,et al.  Beyond Statistical Significance: Implications of Network Structure on Neuronal Activity , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[42]  Haifeng Zhang,et al.  Robustness of Controllability for Networks Based on Edge-Attack , 2014, PloS one.

[43]  Noah J. Cowan,et al.  Nodal Dynamics, Not Degree Distributions, Determine the Structural Controllability of Complex Networks , 2011, PloS one.

[44]  Allan R. Jones,et al.  A mesoscale connectome of the mouse brain , 2014, Nature.

[45]  L. Abbott,et al.  Eigenvalue spectra of random matrices for neural networks. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[46]  A. Barabasi,et al.  The network takeover , 2011, Nature Physics.

[47]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[48]  Lev Muchnik,et al.  Identifying influential spreaders in complex networks , 2010, 1001.5285.

[49]  Alan M. Frieze,et al.  Random graphs , 2006, SODA '06.

[50]  Ian T. Foster,et al.  Mapping the Gnutella Network: Properties of Large-Scale Peer-to-Peer Systems and Implications for System Design , 2002, ArXiv.

[51]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[52]  Derek Ruths,et al.  Reachability-Based Robustness of Network Controllability under Node and Edge Attacks , 2014, 2014 Tenth International Conference on Signal-Image Technology and Internet-Based Systems.

[53]  Brian W. Rogers,et al.  Meeting Strangers and Friends of Friends: How Random are Social Networks? , 2007 .

[54]  Stefan Rotter,et al.  The relevance of network micro-structure for neural dynamics , 2013, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[55]  Rami Puzis,et al.  Computationally efficient link prediction in a variety of social networks , 2013, ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol..

[56]  D. R. Fulkerson,et al.  Maximal Flow Through a Network , 1956 .

[57]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[58]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  The Non-Random Brain: Efficiency, Economy, and Complex Dynamics , 2010, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[59]  Derek Ruths,et al.  Control Profiles of Complex Networks , 2014, Science.

[60]  Richard M. Karp,et al.  A n^5/2 Algorithm for Maximum Matchings in Bipartite Graphs , 1971, SWAT.