Synergistic Sequential Emission of Fractional 10.600 and 1540 nm Lasers for Skin Resurfacing: An Ex Vivo Histological Evaluation

Background: Fractional ablative and non-ablative lasers are useful treatments for skin rejuvenation. A procedure that provides the sequential application of fractional ablative followed by non-ablative laser treatment may reduce patients’ downtime and deliver better cosmetic results than with either laser alone. Objective: The purpose of the current study was to demonstrate the ameliorative and therapeutic effects in skin remodeling of the synergistic use of the two laser wavelengths (fractional ablative CO2 and non-ablative 1540 nm) with three different types of pulse shapes, S-Pulse (SP), D-Pulse (DP) and H-Pulse (HP), through which the CO2 laser can emit, performing an ex vivo histological evaluation. Methods: In this prospective study, ex vivo sheep inner thigh skin was chosen due to its similarity to human skin tissue, and a histological evaluation was performed. Three irradiation conditions, using all of the three CO2 pulse shapes (alone or averaged), were investigated: (1) 10.600 nm alone, the sequential irradiation of the two wavelengths in the same perfectly controlled energy pulses (DOT) for the entire scan area; ((2) 10.600 nm followed immediately by 1540 nm; and (3) 1540 nm followed immediately by 10.600 nm). Results: When comparing ablative to sequential irradiations, the synergy of the two wavelengths did not alter the typical ablative pulse shape of the 10.600 nm laser alone. With the same CO2 pulse shape, the lesion depth did not vary with the synergy of the two wavelengths, while thermal lesion width increased compared to CO2 alone. The ablation rate was achieved, while the total thermal lesion coverage in the scanning area of CO2 − 1540 lasers was greater than when using CO2 alone and then the other sequential irradiation. Conclusions: This study provides important preclinical data for new and early uses of the novel 10.600/1540 nm dual-wavelength non-ablative fractional laser. The synergy of the two wavelengths enhanced all the benefits already available when using CO2 laser systems both in terms of tone strengthening, thanks to a greater shrinking effect, and in terms of stimulation and collagen remodeling thanks to a greater volumetric thermal effect.

[1]  M. Lapidoth,et al.  Clinical and histological evaluation of a dual sequential application of fractional 10,600 nm and 1570 nm lasers, compared to single applications in a porcine model , 2021, Lasers in Medical Science.

[2]  Yi-Wen Wang,et al.  The Optimal Application of Medium Potency Topical Corticosteroids in Preventing Laser-Induced Inflammatory Responses—An Animal Study , 2021, Life.

[3]  S. Nisticò,et al.  A New 675 nm Laser Device in the Treatment of Facial Aging: A Prospective Observational Study. , 2021, Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery.

[4]  S. Nisticò,et al.  Combination of Fractional CO2 Laser and Rhodamine-Intense Pulsed Light in Facial Rejuvenation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2021, Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery.

[5]  R. Liebano,et al.  Efficacy, safety, and guidelines of application of the fractional ablative laser erbium YAG 2940 nm and non-ablative laser erbium glass in rejuvenation, skin spots, and acne in different skin phototypes: a systematic review , 2020, Lasers in Medical Science.

[6]  J. Hoopman,et al.  Novel Use of Non‐Invasive Devices and Microbiopsies to Assess Facial Skin Rejuvenation Following Laser Treatment , 2020, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[7]  Mohammed Alhattab,et al.  The effect of 1540‐nm fractional erbium‐glass laser in the treatment of androgenic alopecia , 2020, Journal of cosmetic dermatology.

[8]  S. Esmat,et al.  Persistent Pixel Stamping Marks: a novel complication of fractional CO2 laser in scar treatment , 2019, Lasers in Medical Science.

[9]  U. Paasch,et al.  Early intervention with non‐ablative fractional laser to improve cutaneous scarring—A randomized controlled trial on the impact of intervention time and fluence levels , 2018, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[10]  P. Mezzana,et al.  Combined fractional resurfacing (10600 nm/1540 nm): Tridimensional imaging evaluation of a new device for skin rejuvenation , 2016, Journal of cosmetic and laser therapy : official publication of the European Society for Laser Dermatology.

[11]  M. Sannino,et al.  Deep pulse fractional CO2 laser combined with a radiofrequency system: results of a case series. , 2014, Photomedicine and laser surgery.

[12]  M. Ardigó,et al.  Preliminary Comparison of Fractional Laser with Fractional Laser Plus Radiofrequency for the Treatment of Acne Scars and Photoaging , 2014, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[13]  A. Filoni,et al.  Combined use of fractional CO2 laser and radiofrequency waves to treat acne scars: A pilot study on 15 patients , 2012, Journal of cosmetic and laser therapy : official publication of the European Society for Laser Dermatology.

[14]  D. Goldberg,et al.  Fractional ablative laser skin resurfacing: A review , 2011, Journal of cosmetic and laser therapy : official publication of the European Society for Laser Dermatology.

[15]  G. Liguori,et al.  Fractional nonablative 1540-nm laser treatment of striae distensae in Fitzpatrick skin types II to IV: clinical and histological results. , 2011, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[16]  A. Hokugo,et al.  Molecular effects of fractional carbon dioxide laser resurfacing on photodamaged human skin. , 2010, Archives of facial plastic surgery.

[17]  T. Lotti,et al.  Fractional CO2 laser: a novel therapeutic device upon photobiomodulation of tissue remodeling and cytokine pathway of tissue repair , 2009, Dermatologic therapy.

[18]  N. Sadick,et al.  Ablative skin resurfacing with a novel microablative CO2 laser. , 2009, Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD.

[19]  Leonard J. Bernstein,et al.  Eyelid Tightening and Improved Eyelid Aperture through Nonablative Fractional Resurfacing , 2008, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[20]  Peter Bjerring,et al.  Low density, non‐ablative fractional CO2 laser rejuvenation , 2008, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[21]  Robert A Weiss,et al.  Short‐Term Histologic Effects of Nonablative Resurfacing: Results with a Dynamically Cooled Millisecond‐Domain 1320 nm Nd YAG Laser , 2002, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[22]  S. Dahan,et al.  Nonablative Remodeling: Clinical, Histologic, Ultrasound Imaging, and Profilometric Evaluation of a 1540 nm Er:Glass Laser , 2001, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[23]  S. Mordon,et al.  Treatment with 815‐nm diode laser induces long‐lasting expression of 72‐kDa heat shock protein in normal rat skin , 2001, The British journal of dermatology.