TagSmart: analysis and visualization for yeast mutant fitness data measured by tag microarrays

BackgroundA nearly complete collection of gene-deletion mutants (96% of annotated open reading frames) of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been systematically constructed. Tag microarrays are widely used to measure the fitness of each mutant in a mutant mixture. The tag array experiments can have a complex experimental design, such as time course measurements and drug treatment with multiple dosages.ResultsTagSmart is a web application for analysis and visualization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant fitness data measured by tag microarrays. It implements a robust statistical approach to assess the concentration differences among S. cerevisiae mutant strains. It also provides an interactive environment for data analysis and visualization. TagSmart has the following advantages over previously described analysis procedures: 1) it is user-friendly software rather than merely a description of analytical procedure; 2) It can handle complicated experimental designs, such as multiple time points and treatment with multiple dosages; 3) it has higher sensitivity and specificity; 4) It allows users to mask out "bad" tags in the analysis.Two biological tests were performed to illustrate the performance of TagSmart. First, we generated titration mixtures of mutant strains, in which the relative concentration of each strain was controlled. We used tag microarrays to measure the numbers of tag copies in each titration mixture. The data was analyzed with TagSmart and the result showed high precision and recall. Second, TagSmart was applied to a dataset in which heterozygous deletion strain mixture pools were treated with a new drug, Cincreasin. TagSmart identified 53 mutant strains as sensitive to Cincreasin treatment. We individually tested each identified mutant, and found 52 out of the 53 predicted mutants were indeed sensitive to Cincreasin.ConclusionTagSmart is provided "as is" to analyze tag array data produced by Affymetrix and Agilent arrays. TagSmart web application is assessable by Windows, Mac, and Linux users. It also has a downloadable version for execution on PCs running Windows. TagSmart is available for academic use at: http://biocomp.bioen.uiuc.edu/tagsmart

[1]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. , 1999, Science.

[2]  John D. Storey,et al.  Strong control, conservative point estimation and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: a unified approach , 2004 .

[3]  J. Bader,et al.  A robust toolkit for functional profiling of the yeast genome. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[4]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  A genome-wide screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for genes affecting UV radiation sensitivity , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome , 2002, Nature.

[6]  Lu Tian,et al.  Comparative analysis of gene sets in the gene ontology space under the multiple hypothesis testing framework , 2004, Proceedings. 2004 IEEE Computational Systems Bioinformatics Conference, 2004. CSB 2004..

[7]  Rafael A. Irizarry,et al.  Improved statistical analysis of budding yeast TAG microarrays revealed by defined spike-in pools , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Role of duplicate genes in genetic robustness against null mutations , 2003, Nature.

[9]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Chemogenomic profiling: identifying the functional interactions of small molecules in yeast. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Nader Pourmand,et al.  Characterization of synthetic DNA bar codes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene-deletion strains. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  F. Spencer,et al.  Bipolar orientation of chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is monitored by Mad1 and Mad2, but not by Mad3. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Rupert G. Miller.  Beyond ANOVA, basics of applied statistics , 1987 .

[13]  Andrew W. Murray,et al.  A Small-Molecule Inhibitor of Mps1 Blocks the Spindle-Checkpoint Response to a Lack of Tension on Mitotic Chromosomes , 2005, Current Biology.

[14]  J. Boeke,et al.  DNA helicase gene interaction network defined using synthetic lethality analyzed by microarray , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[15]  Rafael A. Irizarry,et al.  Improved microarray methods for profiling the yeast knockout strain collection , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[16]  Eric L. Weiss,et al.  Yeast spindle pole body duplication gene MPS1 encodes an essential dual specificity protein kinase. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[17]  Brian D. Peyser,et al.  S-phase checkpoint genes safeguard high-fidelity sister chromatid cohesion. , 2004, Molecular biology of the cell.

[18]  J. Boeke,et al.  A DNA Microarray-Based Genetic Screen for Nonhomologous End-Joining Mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2001, Science.

[19]  J. C. Hinshaw,et al.  Discovering Modes of Action for Therapeutic Compounds Using a Genome-Wide Screen of Yeast Heterozygotes , 2004, Cell.

[20]  John D. Storey,et al.  Statistical significance for genomewide studies , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.