CRASHES AS CRITICAL POINTS

We study a rational expectation model of bubbles and crashes. The model has two components: (1) our key assumption is that a crash may be caused by local self-reinforcing imitation between noise traders. If the tendency for noise traders to imitate their nearest neighbors increases up to a certain point called the “critical” point, all noise traders may place the same order (sell) at the same time, thus causing a crash. The interplay between the progressive strengthening of imitation and the ubiquity of noise is characterized by the hazard rate, i.e. the probability per unit time that the crash will happen in the next instant if it has not happened yet. (2) Since the crash is not a certain deterministic out come of the bubble, it remains rational for traders to remain invested provided they are compensated by a higher rate of growth of the bubble for taking the risk of a crash. Our model distinguishes between the end of the bubble and the time of the crash: the rational expectation constraint has the specific implication that the date of the crash must be random. The theoretical death of the bubble is not the time of the crash because the crash could happen at any time before, even though this is not very likely. The death of the bubble is the most probable time for the crash. There also exists a finite probability of the attaining the end of the bubble without crash. Our model has specific predictions about the presence of certain critical log-periodic patterns in pre-crash prices, associated with the deterministic components of the bubble mechanism. We provide empirical evidence showing that these patterns were indeed present before the crashes of 1929, 1962 and 1987 on Wall Street and the 1997 crash on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. These results are compared with the statistical tests on synthetic data.

[1]  J. Bouchaud,et al.  Are financial crashes predictable , 1998, cond-mat/9804111.

[2]  Didier Sornette,et al.  A hierarchical model of financial crashes , 1998 .

[3]  M. Ausloos,et al.  How the financial crash of October 1997 could have been predicted , 1998 .

[4]  Marcel Ausloos,et al.  The crash of October 1987 seen as a phase transition: amplitude and universality , 1998 .

[5]  D. Sornette,et al.  ”Direct” causal cascade in the stock market , 1998 .

[6]  J. Bouchaud,et al.  Service de Physique de l’État Condensé, Centre d’études de Saclay , 1997 .

[7]  D. Sornette,et al.  Stretched exponential distributions in nature and economy: “fat tails” with characteristic scales , 1998, cond-mat/9801293.

[8]  V. Yukalov,et al.  Renormalization Group Analysis of October Market Crashes , 1997, cond-mat/9710336.

[9]  P. Freund,et al.  DISCRETE SCALE INVARIANCE AND THE SECOND BLACK MONDAY , 1997, cond-mat/9710324.

[10]  青木 正直,et al.  New approaches to macroeconomic modeling : evolutionary stochastic dynamics, multiple equilibria, and externalities as field effects , 1998 .

[11]  D. Sornette.  Discrete scale invariance and complex dimensions , 1997, cond-mat/9707012.

[12]  D. Sornette,et al.  Large financial crashes , 1997, cond-mat/9704127.

[13]  Jean-Philippe Bouchaud,et al.  Théorie des risques financiers , 1997 .

[14]  Rama Cont,et al.  Scale Invariance and Beyond , 1997 .

[15]  Huntley Schaller,et al.  Bank of Canada Banque du Canada Working Paper 96-13 / Document de travail 96-13 Speculative Behaviour , Regime-Switching and Stock Market Crashes , 1997 .

[16]  Masanao Aoki,et al.  New Approaches to Macroeconomic Modeling: Evolutionary Stochastic Dynamics , 1996 .

[17]  D. Sornette,et al.  Stock Market Crashes, Precursors and Replicas , 1995, cond-mat/9510036.

[18]  P. Freund,et al.  DISCRETE SCALE INVARIANCE IN STOCK MARKETS BEFORE CRASHES , 1995, cond-mat/9509033.

[19]  Jacek Klinowski,et al.  Taboo Search: An Approach to the Multiple Minima Problem , 1995, Science.

[20]  Richard Kershaw,et al.  Finance , 1892, Handbooks in operations research and management science.

[21]  D Cvijovicacute,et al.  Taboo search: an approach to the multiple minima problem. , 1995, Science.

[22]  John Tooby,et al.  Better than rational: Evolutionary psychology and the invisible hand , 1994 .

[23]  B. LeBaron,et al.  Simple Technical Trading Rules and the Stochastic Properties of Stock Returns , 1992 .

[24]  R. Chou,et al.  ARCH modeling in finance: A review of the theory and empirical evidence , 1992 .

[25]  E. Fama,et al.  Efficient Capital Markets : II , 2007 .

[26]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes , 1990 .

[27]  H. Leland..  Portfolio Insurance and October 19th , 1988 .

[28]  R. Lathe.  Phd by thesis , 1988, Nature.

[29]  Portfolio Insurance and the Market Crash , 1988 .

[30]  R. Thaler,et al.  Does the Stock Market Overreact , 1985 .

[31]  Frederick W. Kremkau,et al.  Physics Review , 1985 .

[32]  B. Dickinson,et al.  Stochastic models of interacting systems , 1984, The 23rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[33]  Bernard Derrida,et al.  Fractal structure of zeros in hierarchical models , 1983 .

[34]  Y. Pomeau.  Symétrie des fluctuations dans le renversement du temps , 1982 .

[35]  F. Y. Wu.  The Potts model , 1982 .

[36]  K. Wilson.  Problems in Physics with many Scales of Length , 1979 .

[37]  O. Blanchard,et al.  Speculative bubbles, crashes and rational expectations , 1979 .

[38]  J. Clyde Mitchell,et al.  Network Analysis: Studies in Human Interaction. , 1974 .

[39]  N. Goldenfeld.  Lectures On Phase Transitions And The Renormalization Group , 1972 .

[40]  E. Fama.  EFFICIENT CAPITAL MARKETS: A REVIEW OF THEORY AND EMPIRICAL WORK* , 1970 .

[41]  Irwin Schmuckler,et al.  The Confidence Game. , 1969 .

[42]  P. Libby.  The Scientific American , 1881, Nature.

[43]  L. Onsager.  Crystal statistics. I. A two-dimensional model with an order-disorder transition , 1944 .

[44]  J. Proudfoot,et al.  Noise , 1931, The Indian medical gazette.