Unilateral spectral and temporal compression reduces binaural fusion for normal hearing listeners with cochlear implant simulations

Patients with single sided deafness have recently begun receiving cochlear implants in their deaf ear. These patients gain a significant benefit from having a cochlear implant. However, despite this benefit, they are considerably slower to develop binaural abilities such as summation compared to bilateral cochlear implant patients. This suggests that these patients have difficulty fusing electric and acoustic signals. Although this may reflect inherent differences between electric and acoustic stimulation, it may also reflect properties of the processor and fitting system, which result in spectral and temporal compression. To examine the possibility that unilateral spectral and temporal compression can adversely affect binaural fusion, this study tested normal hearing listeners' binaural fusion through the use of vocoded speech with unilateral spectral and temporal compression. The results indicate that unilateral spectral and temporal compression can each hinder binaural fusion and thus may adversely affect binaural abilities in patients with single sided deafness who use a cochlear implant in their deaf ear.

[1]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Effects of Extreme Tonotopic Mismatches Between Bilateral Cochlear Implants on Electric Pitch Perception: A Case Study , 2011, Ear and hearing.

[2]  Mary Hardy,et al.  The length of the organ of Corti in man , 1938 .

[3]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Cochlear Implant Speech Processor Frequency Allocations May Influence Pitch Perception , 2008, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[4]  Alan Kan,et al.  Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on binaural fusion and lateralization in bilateral cochlear-implant users. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Justin M Aronoff,et al.  The Effect of Different Cochlear Implant Microphones on Acoustic Hearing Individuals' Binaural Benefits for Speech Perception in Noise , 2011, Ear and hearing.

[6]  W Jesteadt,et al.  Latency of auditory brain-stem responses and otoacoustic emissions using tone-burst stimuli. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Antje Aschendorff,et al.  Comparison of Pseudobinaural Hearing to Real Binaural Hearing Rehabilitation After Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Unilateral Deafness and Tinnitus , 2011, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[8]  R. Tyler,et al.  Sequential bilateral cochlear implantation: speech perception and localization pre- and post-second cochlear implantation. , 2012, American journal of audiology.

[9]  Donald K. Eddington,et al.  Depth of Electrode Insertion and Postoperative Performance in Humans with Cochlear Implants: A Histopathologic Study , 2010, Audiology and Neurotology.

[10]  Albert S. Bregman,et al.  The Auditory Scene. (Book Reviews: Auditory Scene Analysis. The Perceptual Organization of Sound.) , 1990 .

[11]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Comparison of Speech Recognition and Localization Performance in Bilateral and Unilateral Cochlear Implant Users Matched on Duration of Deafness and Age at Implantation , 2008, Ear and hearing.

[12]  Emily Buss,et al.  Hearing-in-Noise Benefits After Bilateral Simultaneous Cochlear Implantation Continue to Improve 4 Years After Implantation , 2009, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[13]  Steven Greenberg,et al.  A space-time theory of pitch and timbre based on cortical expansion of the cochlear traveling wave delay , 1998 .

[14]  R. V. Hoesel.  Exploring the benefits of bilateral cochlear implants. , 2004 .

[15]  Qian-Jie Fu,et al.  Binaural Benefit With and Without a Bilateral Spectral Mismatch in Acoustic Simulations of Cochlear Implant Processing , 2013, Ear and hearing.

[16]  Geo. R. Lawrence Co..  Pacific Grove, California , 1906 .

[17]  Alan Kan,et al.  Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on the salience of binaural cues in conditions that simulate bilateral cochlear-implant listening. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Bilateral and Unilateral Cochlear Implant Users Compared on Speech Perception in Noise , 2010, Ear and hearing.

[19]  Katrien Vermeire,et al.  Binaural Hearing after Cochlear Implantation in Subjects with Unilateral Sensorineural Deafness and Tinnitus , 2008, Audiology and Neurotology.

[20]  D. Rom.  A sequentially rejective test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni inequality , 1990 .

[21]  D. D. Greenwood.  A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  David B. Grayden,et al.  Across-Frequency Delays Based on the Cochlear Traveling Wave: Enhanced Speech Presentation for Cochlear Implants , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.