HOW PRODUCT REPRESENTATION TYPES ARE PERCEIVED AT THE CLIENT’S END TO FACILITATE COMMUNICATION AND DECISION MAKING

The ability to communicate effectively, honestly and convincingly to design clients, according to the required level of understanding, is important to facilitate decision making in the designing process in a cost responsible manner. This article shows that the Design clients’ assessment of representation type according to level of detailing and completeness of communicated information reversably complements the level of allowance for design changes. “Presentation Drawings” communicate a high level of completeness, which is almost equal to “High Quality Presentations in CAD” and ”Quality Design Models. As expected, interation with the tactile volume creates a “near completion” assumption among design clients. A dualistic attitude can be observed among clients, when dealing with CAD models. Due to the incompleteness, but also viewing capabilities of initial CAD-models, clients were averagely neutral in their opinions concerning the level of design information provided by it. However, the representation quality of ”Detailed Design Models” are being perceived similar to ”Presentation Drawings”, because of their high level of detailing, realism and ”frozen” mode of presentation.

[1]  Udo Lindemann,et al.  Effort-saving product representations in design—results of a questionnaire survey , 2001 .

[2]  P. Clarkson,et al.  Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design , 2004 .

[3]  Rüdiger von der Weth,et al.  Strategies, Competence and Style--Problem Solving in Engineering Design. , 1995 .

[4]  Ö. Akin Psychology of architectural design , 1986 .

[5]  Vladimir Hubka,et al.  Principles of engineering design , 1982 .

[6]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Understanding Representation in Design , 1998, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[7]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[8]  Manlai You,et al.  The sketch in industrial design process , 2003 .

[9]  Ellen Yi-Luen Do,et al.  Intentions in and relations among design drawings , 2000 .

[10]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  What designers know , 2018, The Design Student’s Journey.

[11]  PENG-WHAI Won THE COMPARISON BETWEEN VISUAL THINKING USING COMPUTER AND CONVENTIONAL MEDIA IN THE CONCEPT GENERATION STAGES OF DESIGN , 2001 .

[12]  Ben Jonson,et al.  Design ideation: the conceptual sketch in the digital age , 2005 .

[13]  Louis L. Bucciarelli,et al.  Designing Engineers , 1994 .

[14]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[15]  N.F.M. Roozenburg,et al.  Models of the design process: integrating across the disciplines , 1991 .

[16]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Analysing design activity , 1996 .

[17]  John S. Gero,et al.  Comparing collaborative co-located and distributed design processes in digital and traditional sketching environments: A protocol study using the function-behaviour-structure coding scheme , 2011 .

[18]  Birgit Helene Jevnaker,et al.  Inaugurative learning: Adapting a new design approach , 1993 .

[19]  Mogens Myrup Andreasen,et al.  Modelling—The Language of the Designer , 1994 .

[20]  John Marx,et al.  A proposal for alternative methods for teaching digital design , 2000 .

[21]  Donald A. and Wigging Glenn Schon,et al.  Kinds of Seeing and Their Functions in Designing , 1988 .

[22]  Leandro Madrazo Types and Instances: a paradigm for teaching design with computers , 1999 .

[23]  R. Weth Konstruieren: Heuristische Kompetenz, Erfahrung und individuelles Vorgehen , 1994 .

[24]  Mikael Söderman Product Representations Exploring Computer-Based Technologies and Customers' Understanding of Product Concepts , 2001 .

[25]  G. Goldschmidt The dialectics of sketching , 1991 .

[26]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  How designers perceive sketches , 2006 .

[27]  John S. Gero,et al.  Drawings and the design process , 1998 .

[28]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  On visual design thinking: the vis kids of architecture , 1994 .

[29]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  An overview of descriptive studies in relation to a general design research methodology , 1998 .

[30]  Michael Tovey,et al.  Drawing and CAD in industrial design , 1989 .

[31]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  Computers, words and pictures , 1997 .

[32]  Klaus Ehrlenspiel,et al.  Integrierte Produktentwicklung : Methoden für Prozeßorganisation, Produkterstellung und Konstruktion , 1995 .

[33]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article HOW DIAGRAMS CAN IMPROVE REASONING , 2022 .

[34]  Daniel M. Herbert,et al.  Study Drawings in Architectural Design: Their Properties as a Graphic Medium , 1988 .

[35]  V. Goel Sketches of thought , 1995 .

[36]  M. Hegarty Mental animation: inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance , 2006 .

[38]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Observations of teamwork and social processes in design , 1995 .

[39]  Louis L. Bucciarelli,et al.  An ethnographic perspective on engineering design , 1988 .

[40]  Paul G. Patterson,et al.  Criteria used to select management consultants , 1992 .

[41]  Margaret Bruce,et al.  It's all in a relationship: a comparative study of client-design consultant relationships , 1993 .