Can Individual Differences in History of Dominance Explain the Development of Linear Dominance Hierarchies

Observed dominance hierarchies are often more linear than expected from randomly-formed dominance relationships, and in triads of animals attacks are distributed non-randomly. I hypothesize that an individual's history of dominance affects its probability of initiating aggressive interactions in the future and that individuals with winning records are more likely to initiate (winning begets initiating). Consistent with this hypothesis, evidence is presented that dominant individuals are more likely to attack than subordinate individuals. The winning begets initiating hypothesis may also explain why correlations between predicted dominance ranks (based on size, age etc.) and observed dominance ranks can be low: If the cost of engaging in and losing an interaction is high relative to the potential benefits of winning, then a large individual conditioned to be subordinate may refrain from contesting smaller, dominant individuals despite its actual competitive superiority.

[1]  A. Rutberg.  Factors Influencing Dominance Status in American Bison Cows (Bison bison) , 2010 .

[2]  Ivan D. Chase,et al.  Models of hierarchy formation in animal societies , 1974 .

[3]  F. Waal.  The organization of agonistic relations within two captive groups of Java-monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). , 2010 .

[4]  Michael C. Appleby,et al.  The probability of linearity in hierarchies , 1983, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  B. Ginsburg,et al.  Some Effects of Conditioning on Social Dominance and Subordination in Inbred Strains of Mice , 1942, Physiological Zoology.

[6]  S. Hrdy,et al.  Hierarchical Relations Among Female Hanuman Langurs (Primates: Colobinae, Presbytis entellus) , 1976, Science.

[7]  R. Ulrich,et al.  EFFECTS OF AGE AND RELATED FACTORS ON THE PAIN-AGGRESSION REACTION. , 1965, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[8]  R. P. Powell,et al.  Ranks and relationships in Highland ponies and Highland Cows. , 2010, Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie.

[9]  N. E. Van de Poll,et al.  Aggressive behaviour in rats: Effects of winning or losing on subsequent aggressive interactions , 1982, Behavioural Processes.

[10]  P. Brain,et al.  Behavioural comparisons of isolated, dominant and subordinate mice , 1979, Behavioural Processes.

[11]  H. Landau.  On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies: I. Effect of inherent characteristics , 1951 .

[12]  W. Jackson,et al.  Linearity in dominance hierarchies: a second look at the individual attributes model , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  J. A. King.  Relationships between early social experience and adult aggressive behavior in inbred mice. , 1957, The Journal of genetic psychology.

[14]  E. Missakian.  Genealogical and cross-genealogical dominance relations in a group of free-ranging rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) on Cayo Santiago , 1972, Primates.

[15]  Sievert Rohwer,et al.  Dyed birds achieve higher social status than controls in Harris' sparrows , 1985, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  W. Addison,et al.  Agonistic behavior and social organization in a herd of goats as affected by the introduction of non-members , 1982 .

[17]  W. S. Sabine.  THE WINTER SOCIETY OF THE OREGON JUNCO: INTOLERANCE, DOMINANCE, AND THE PECKING ORDER , 1959 .

[18]  J. W. Leonard.  A strategy approach to the study of primate dominance behaviour , 1979, Behavioural Processes.

[19]  M. Kahn.  The effect of severe defeat at various age levels on the aggressive behavior of mice. , 1951, The Journal of genetic psychology.

[20]  R. V. Bovbjerg.  Dominance Order in the Crayfish Orconectes virilis (Hagen) , 1953, Physiological Zoology.

[21]  The social order of chickens. , 1956 .

[22]  Ivan D. Chase,et al.  The sequential analysis of aggressive acts during hierarchy formation: an application of the ‘jigsaw puzzle’ approach , 1985, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  P. J. B. Slater,et al.  Individual differences and dominance hierarchies , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  Jerram L. Brown.  Aggressiveness, Dominance and Social Organization in the Steller Jay , 1963 .

[25]  I. Chase,et al.  Social Process and Hierarchy Formation in Small Groups: A Comparative Perspective , 1980 .

[26]  T. Schjelderup-Ebbe,et al.  Beiträge zur Sozialpsychologie des Haushuhns. , 1922 .

[27]  I. Bernstein,et al.  Circumstances in which exact dominance rank may be important , 1981, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.