Verifying quality and safety in health informatics services

Information and its handling and transmission form an essential part of health care and are reflected in professional standards. Automated information systems in health care—health informatics services—will improve these functions and bring new opportunities through the harnessing of modern information and communications technologies. Thus, computer support is now essential in many parts of medicine, the US Institute of Medicine has long espoused the value of computerised patient records,1 and many countries have developed strategies on this topic, and there are countless health related internet sites. However, as new information and communication technologies in health bring new opportunities, they also bring new risks. Emphasis has rightly been placed on ensuring appropriate levels of confidentiality in electronic information systems—to the point that the highly exacting requirements being demanded by independent commentators and professional bodies2 are difficult to satisfy without jeopardising the functioning of core services 3 4 or the interests of the most vulnerable groups.5 In contrast, much less thought has been given so far to ensuring the appropriateness of the design and integrity of functioning of health informatics services. #### Summary points Like drugs 40 years ago, products in health informatics are unregulated with regard to safety and efficacy A European project has now recommended ways of accrediting healthcare related software, telemedicine, and internet sites A scheme like CE marking of electrical goods is recommended for software, national regulatory bodies should be identified for telemedicine, and a European certification of integrity scheme developed for websites If informatics systems are increasingly essential in the delivery of health care then their integrity and quality must be of equal importance, but this has been scarcely recognised to date. In 1963 the then UK secretary of state for health stated to the House of Commons: “The House and the public suddenly …

[1]  R. Kravitz,et al.  Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. , 2001, JAMA.

[2]  H. Sandvik Health information and interaction on the internet: a survey of female urinary incontinence , 1999, BMJ.

[3]  G Eysenbach,et al.  Responses to unsolicited patient e-mail requests for medical advice on the World Wide Web. , 1998, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

[4]  Mary Hawking Code conversions, data stability and the future - an agenda for discussion , 1995 .

[5]  Michael Rigby,et al.  Towards an Ethical Protocol in Mental Health Informatics , 1998, MedInfo.

[6]  Michael Rigby,et al.  Considerations on the quality of medical software and information services , 1999, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[7]  Michael Rigby,et al.  Taking Health Telematics into the 21st Century , 2000 .

[8]  Michael Rigby,et al.  Keeping Confidence in Confidentiality: Linking Ethics, Efficacy, and Opportunity in Health Care Computing - A Case Study , 1997, Personal Medical Information.

[9]  P. Kimmel,et al.  Poison on line--acute renal failure caused by oil of wormwood purchased through the Internet. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  M Rigby The management and policy challenges of the globalisation effect of informatics and telemedicine. , 1999, Health policy.

[11]  J Wyatt,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of clinical software, exemplified by decision support systems. , 1997, International journal of medical informatics.

[12]  J. Forsström,et al.  Why certification of medical software would be useful? , 1997, International journal of medical informatics.

[13]  P. Impicciatore,et al.  Reliability of health information for the public on the world wide web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home , 1997, BMJ.

[14]  E. B. Steen,et al.  The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  Ross Anderson,et al.  Security in Clinical Information Systems , 1996 .

[16]  P. Cavalli,et al.  False-negative results in Down's syndrome screening , 1996, The Lancet.

[17]  Ross J. Anderson Personal medical information : security, engineering, and ethics : personal information workshop, Cambridge, UK, June 21-22, 1996 : proceedings , 1997 .