Effect of Impurities on Subsurface CO 2 Storage Processes

This chapter evaluates the potential effect of highly reactive impurities (SO x , NO x ) on two important aspects of large-scale geological storage of CO 2 —well injectivity and enhanced oil recovery processes. The primary influence on well injectivity is expected to be geochemical alteration of the near-well formation. The simulations of a “worst-case” scenario indicate that the net change in mineral volume is likely to be small, even though extensive changes in the type of minerals may occur. Thus, the effect on injectivity is likely to be insignificant. The presence of impurities in their likely concentrations of less than 1 mole% may speed up the reactions, but otherwise should have little incremental effect on the injectivity. The effectiveness of enhanced recovery processes using CO 2 depends on factors such as minimum miscibility pressure (MMP), mobility ratio, and gravity number. Correlations for these factors developed over several decades of field experience in CO 2 flooding indicate that impurities at the levels typical of flue gases are unlikely to affect recovery adversely.

[1]  J. C. Ader,et al.  Slaughter Estate Unit CO/sub 2/ pilot reservoir description via a black oil model waterflood history match , 1982 .

[2]  Mukul M. Sharma,et al.  Modeling relative permeability effects in gas-condensate reservoirs with a new trapping model , 2000 .

[3]  Yun Wang,et al.  Analytical calculation of minimum miscibility pressure , 1998 .

[4]  Larry W. Lake,et al.  Geochemistry and fluid flow , 2002 .

[5]  P. G. Christman,et al.  Investigation of Unexpectedly Low Field-Observed Fluid Mobilities During Some CO2 Tertiary Floods , 1987 .

[6]  Hua Yuan Application of miscibility calculations to gas floods , 2003 .

[7]  A. L. Benham,et al.  Miscible Fluid Displacement - Prediction of Miscibility , 1960 .

[8]  R. Johns,et al.  Theory of Multicontact Miscible Displacement with Nitrogen , 1997 .

[9]  Dandina N. Rao,et al.  A new technique of vanishing interfacial tension for miscibility determination , 1997 .

[10]  L. Lake,et al.  Enhanced Oil Recovery , 2017 .

[11]  L. W. Holm,et al.  Effect of oil composition on miscible-type displacement by carbon dioxide , 1982 .

[12]  R. S. Wenger,et al.  Correlation of Minimum Miscibility Pressure for Impure CO2 Streams , 1985 .

[13]  R. S. Metcalfe,et al.  Effects of Impurities on Minimum Miscibility Pressures and Minimum Enrichment Levels for CO2 and Rich-Gas Displacements , 1982 .

[14]  W. F. Yellig,et al.  Determination and Prediction of CO2 Minimum Miscibility Pressures (includes associated paper 8876 ) , 1980 .

[15]  L. M. Holm,et al.  Mechanisms of Oil Displacement By Carbon Dioxide , 1974 .

[16]  D. Rao,et al.  Determination of gas-oil miscibility conditions by interfacial tension measurements. , 2003, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[17]  Gary A. Pope,et al.  Influence of Viscous and Buoyancy Forces on the Mobilization of Residual Tetrachloroethylene during Surfactant Flushing , 1996 .

[18]  Kamy Sepehrnoori,et al.  A compositional simulator for modeling surfactant enhanced aquifer remediation, 1 Formulation , 1996 .

[19]  Larry W. Lake,et al.  Scaling immiscible flow through permeable media by inspectional analysis , 1992 .

[20]  Franklin M. Orr,et al.  CALCULATION OF MINIMUM MISCIBILITY PRESSURE , 2000 .

[21]  Guohe Huang,et al.  Development of an artificial neural network model for predicting minimum miscibility pressure in CO2 flooding , 2003 .