Accuracy of an Automatic Patient-Positioning System Based on the Correlation of Two Edge Images in Radiotherapy

We have clinically evaluated the accuracy of an automatic patient-positioning system based on the image correlation of two edge images in radiotherapy. Ninety-six head & neck images from eight patients undergoing proton therapy were compared with a digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) of planning CT. Two edge images, a reference image and a test image, were extracted by applying a Canny edge detector algorithm to a DRR and a 2D X-ray image, respectively, of each patient before positioning. In a simulation using a humanoid phantom, performed to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, no registration errors were observed for given ranges of rotation, pitch, and translation in the x, y, and z directions. For real patients, however, there were discrepancies between the automatic positioning method and manual positioning by physicians or technicians. Using edged head coronal- and sagittal-view images, the average differences in registration between these two methods for the x, y, and z directions were 0.11 cm, 0.09 cm and 0.11 cm, respectively, whereas the maximum discrepancies were 0.34 cm, 0.38 cm, and 0.50 cm, respectively. For rotation and pitch, the average registration errors were 0.95° and 1.00°, respectively, and the maximum errors were 3.6° and 2.3°, respectively. The proposed automatic patient-positioning system based on edge image comparison was relatively accurate for head and neck patients. However, image deformation during treatment may render the automatic method less accurate, since the test image many differ significantly from the reference image.

[1]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Digital Step Edges from Zero Crossing of Second Directional Derivatives , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[2]  J Kim,et al.  A feasibility study of mutual information based setup error estimation for radiotherapy. , 2001, Medical physics.

[3]  Ludwik Kurz,et al.  Line Detection in Noisy and Structured Backgrounds Using Græco-Latin Squares , 1993, CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process..

[4]  D Marr,et al.  Theory of edge detection , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[5]  D Verellen,et al.  Automatic on-line electronic portal image analysis with a wavelet-based edge detector. , 2000, Medical physics.

[6]  K. Eilertsen,et al.  Methods for fully automated verification of patient set-up in external beam radiotherapy with polygon shaped fields. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Haruo Yamashita,et al.  Patient positioning method based on binary image correlation between two edge images for proton-beam radiation therapy. , 2005, Medical physics.

[8]  K W Leszczynski,et al.  An image registration scheme applied to verification of radiation therapy. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Picture Processing and Psychopictorics , 1970 .

[10]  A L Boyer,et al.  An image correlation procedure for digitally reconstructed radiographs and electronic portal images. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  Ludwik Kurz,et al.  Edge detection in correlated noise using latin square masks , 1988, Pattern Recognit..

[12]  A. Bel,et al.  Effect of translational and rotational errors on complex dose distributions with off-line and on-line position verification. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Manfred H. Hueckel.  An Operator Which Locates Edges in Digitized Pictures , 1971, J. ACM.

[14]  M. Goitein,et al.  Accuracy of radiation field alignment in clinical practice. , 1985, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  Hanne M Kooy,et al.  Target volume dose considerations in proton beam treatment planning for lung tumors. , 2005, Medical physics.

[16]  Rasika Rajapakshe,et al.  Pseudocorrelation: a fast, robust, absolute, grey-level image alignment algorithm. , 1994 .

[17]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[18]  R A Kirsch,et al.  Computer determination of the constituent structure of biological images. , 1971, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[19]  M. Langer,et al.  Optimization of beam weights under dose-volume restrictions. , 1987, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  J Troccaz,et al.  Patient set-up using portal images: 2D/2D image registration using mutual information. , 2000, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[21]  N. Nahi,et al.  Bayesian recursive image estimation. , 1972 .

[22]  I I Rosen,et al.  Dose-volume considerations with linear programming optimization. , 1991, Medical physics.

[23]  A Zaccarin,et al.  Automatic setup deviation measurements with electronic portal images for pelvic fields. , 1998, Medical physics.

[24]  A L Boyer,et al.  Investigation of an FFT-based correlation technique for verification of radiation treatment setup. , 1991, Medical physics.

[25]  M Goitein,et al.  Compensating for heterogeneities in proton radiation therapy. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  L. Marks,et al.  A dose‐volume‐based tool for evaluating and ranking IMRT treatment plans , 2004, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.