Input-based structure-specific proficiency predicts the neural mechanism of adult L2 syntactic processing

This study used Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) to explore the role of input-based structure-specific proficiency in L2 syntactic processing, using English subject-verb agreement structures as the stimuli. A pre-test/trainings/post-test paradigm of experimental and control groups was employed, and Chinese speakers who learned English as a second language (L2) participated in the experiment. At pre-test, no ERP component related to the subject-verb agreement structures violations was observed in either group. At training session, the experimental group learned the subject-verb agreement structures, while the control group learned other syntactic structures. After two continuously intensive input trainings, at post-test, a significant P600 component related to the subject-verb agreement structures violations was elicited in the experimental group, but not in the control group. These findings suggest that input training improves structure-specific proficiency, which is reflected in the neural mechanism of L2 syntactic processing.

[1]  H. Barber,et al.  Gender and number processing in Chinese learners of Spanish – Evidence from Event Related Potentials , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  Cheryl Frenck-Mestre,et al.  Brain Potentials Reveal Discrete Stages of L2 Grammatical Learning , 2010 .

[3]  Lijuan Liang,et al.  Processing morphologically complex words in second-language learners: the effect of proficiency. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[4]  A. Greco,et al.  Language use affects proficiency in Italian–Spanish bilinguals irrespective of age of second language acquisition* , 2014, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[5]  Lee Osterhout,et al.  Second-language learning and changes in the brain , 2008, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[6]  Julia Herschensohn.  Functional categories and the acquisition of object clitics in L2 French , 2004 .

[7]  A Hahne,et al.  What's Different in Second-Language Processing? Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[8]  Carmen Muñoz,et al.  A critical review of age-related research on L2 ultimate attainment , 2010, Language Teaching.

[9]  C. Pliatsikas,et al.  Processing empty categories in a second language: When naturalistic exposure fills the (intermediate) gap* , 2012, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[10]  Angela D Friederici,et al.  ERP evidence for different strategies in the processing of case markers in native speakers and non-native learners , 2007, BMC Neuroscience.

[11]  Karsten Steinhauer,et al.  Temporal dynamics of late second language acquisition: evidence from event-related brain potentials , 2009 .

[12]  Kara Morgan-Short,et al.  Explicit and Implicit Second Language Training Differentially Affect the Achievement of Native-like Brain Activation Patterns , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  E. Gibson,et al.  The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty , 2000 .

[14]  V. Marchman,et al.  The language-specific nature of grammatical development: evidence from bilingual language learners. , 2004, Developmental science.

[16]  Ernesto Pereda,et al.  Measuring second language proficiency with EEG synchronization: how functional cortical networks and hemispheric involvement differ as a function of proficiency level in second language speakers , 2009 .

[17]  Ping Li,et al.  ERP signatures of subject–verb agreement in L2 learning , 2007, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[18]  Erika Hoff,et al.  Properties of dual language exposure that influence 2-year-olds' bilingual proficiency. , 2011, Child development.

[19]  J. Paradis.  Bilingual Children's Acquisition of English Verb Morphology: Effects of Language Exposure, Structure Complexity, and Task Type , 2010 .

[20]  V. Gathercole.  Miami and North Wales, So Far and Yet So Near: A Constructivist Account of Morphosyntactic Development in Bilingual Children , 2007 .

[21]  Paola E. Dussias,et al.  The effect of exposure on syntactic parsing in Spanish–English bilinguals , 2007, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[22]  Hiroki Nakata,et al.  An ERP Study of Second Language Learning after Childhood: Effects of Proficiency , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Making syntax of sense: number agreement in sentence production. , 2005, Psychological review.

[24]  H. Hopp.  The development of L2 morphology , 2013 .

[25]  Harriet Wood Bowden,et al.  An ERP study of proficiency in second language , 2007 .

[26]  Nan Jiang.  Morphological insensitivity in second language processing , 2004 .

[27]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT MEASURES OF SENSITIVITY TO VIOLATIONS IN SECOND LANGUAGE GRAMMAR: An Event-Related Potential Investigation , 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[28]  Natasha Tokowicz,et al.  Event-related brain potentials and second language learning: syntactic processing in late L2 learners at different L2 proficiency levels , 2010 .

[29]  A. Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  Brain potentials for derivational morphology: An ERP study of deadjectival nominalizations in Spanish , 2012, Brain and Language.

[30]  Yan Yan,et al.  ERP evidence for different strategies employed by native speakers and L2 learners in sentence processing , 2009, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[31]  Gabriella Vigliocco,et al.  Subject-verb agreement errors in French and English: The role of syntactic hierarchy , 2002 .

[32]  Karsten Steinhauer,et al.  Native-like brain processing of syntax can be attained by university foreign language learners , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  L. Osterhout,et al.  Novice Learners, Longitudinal Designs, and Event-Related Potentials: A Means for Exploring the Neurocognition of Second Language Processing. , 2006 .

[34]  L. Stowe,et al.  Second language processing: when are first and second languages processed similarly? , 2008 .

[35]  F. Genesee,et al.  Brain Responses before and after Intensive Second Language Learning: Proficiency Based Changes and First Language Background Effects in Adult Learners , 2012, PloS one.

[36]  Karsten Steinhauer,et al.  Brain signatures of artificial language processing: Evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  P. Marentette,et al.  The role of type and token frequency in using past tense morphemes correctly. , 2007, Developmental science.

[38]  D. Tanner,et al.  Individual differences reveal stages of L2 grammatical acquisition: ERP evidence* , 2012, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.