Passenger seating position and the risk of passenger death or injury in traffic crashes.

OBJECTIVE To estimate the association of passenger seat position with the risk of death and serious injury for passengers in traffic crashes. METHODS Using 1993-2000 data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Crashworthiness Data System (CDS), the risk ratio for death and serious injury was estimated for rear seat passengers compared with front seat passengers in motor vehicle crashes. RESULTS The adjusted risk ratio for death of passengers in the rear seat in a crash was 0.61 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46-0.81). Rear seat passenger position was also associated with a decrease in the risk of death and serious injury compared with the front seat passenger position: risk ratio=0.67 (95% CI 0.57-0.78). CONCLUSION We estimated that the rear seat passenger position may reduce the risk of death in a motor vehicle crash by about 39% and reduce the risk of death or serious injury in a crash by 33%, compared with the front seat passenger position. If the associations that we report are causal, sitting in the rear seat, compared with the front seat, may prevent about 4 in 10 passenger deaths, or 3 in 10 passenger deaths and injuries, that might otherwise occur.

[1]  W. Haddon,et al.  The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. , 1974, The Journal of trauma.

[2]  M Segui-Gomez,et al.  Driver air bag effectiveness by severity of the crash. , 2000, American journal of public health.

[3]  M Segui-Gomez,et al.  Child Passenger Safety: Decisions about Seating Location, Airbag Exposure, and Restraint Use , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  L Evans.  Rear seat restraint system effectiveness in preventing fatalities. , 1988, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Tx Station.  Stata Statistical Software: Release 7. , 2001 .

[6]  M C Frick,et al.  Seating position in cars and fatality risk. , 1988, American journal of public health.

[7]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[8]  L Evans,et al.  The effectiveness of safety belts in preventing fatalities. , 1986, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  A Skalkidou,et al.  Car restraints and seating position for prevention of motor vehicle injuries in Greece , 1998, Archives of disease in childhood.

[10]  S A Ferguson,et al.  Seating positions and children's risk of dying in motor vehicle crashes , 1998, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[11]  C. Gouriéroux,et al.  PSEUDO MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHODS: THEORY , 1984 .

[12]  S Greenland,et al.  The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[13]  David E. Hapeman.  Statistical Analysis of Categorical Data , 2000, Technometrics.

[14]  Joseph L Schafer,et al.  Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data , 1997 .

[15]  H M Corneli,et al.  Effect of Seating Position and Restraint Use on Injuries to Children in Motor Vehicle Crashes , 2000, Pediatrics.

[16]  J. S. Long,et al.  Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables , 1997 .

[17]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Odds ratios should be avoided when events are common , 1998, BMJ.

[18]  Stanley Lemeshow,et al.  Sampling of Populations: Methods and Applications , 1991 .

[19]  J. Zhang,et al.  What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. , 1998, JAMA.

[20]  F P Rivara,et al.  Effectiveness of automatic shoulder belt systems in motor vehicle crashes. , 2000, JAMA.

[21]  Peter Cummings,et al.  Matched-pair cohort methods in traffic crash research. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  L Greenberg,et al.  POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT (PAR) QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROJECT , 1996 .

[23]  D. Rubin,et al.  Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. , 1989 .