SWATH enables precise label‐free quantification on proteome scale

MS‐based proteomics has emerged as a powerful tool in biological studies. The shotgun proteomics strategy, in which proteolytic peptides are analyzed in data‐dependent mode, enables a detection of the most comprehensive proteome (>10 000 proteins from whole‐cell lysate). The quantitative proteomics uses stable isotopes or label‐free method to measure relative protein abundance. The isotope labeling strategies are more precise and accurate compared to label‐free methods, but labeling procedures are complicated and expensive, and the sample number and types are also limited. Sequential window acquisition of all theoretical mass spectra (SWATH) is a recently developed technique, in which data‐independent acquisition is coupled with peptide spectral library match. In principle SWATH method is able to do label‐free quantification in an MRM‐like manner, which has higher quantification accuracy and precision. Previous data have demonstrated that SWATH can be used to quantify less complex systems, such as spiked‐in peptide mixture or protein complex. Our study first time assessed the quantification performance of SWATH method on proteome scale using a complex mouse‐cell lysate sample. In total 3600 proteins got identified and quantified without sample prefractionation. The SWATH method shows outstanding quantification precision, whereas the quantification accuracy becomes less perfect when protein abundances differ greatly. However, this inaccuracy does not prevent discovering biological correlates, because the measured signal intensities had linear relationship to the sample loading amounts; thus the SWATH method can predict precisely the significance of a protein. Our results prove that SWATH can provide precise label‐free quantification on proteome scale.

[1]  M. Linscheid,et al.  Quantitative proteomics , 2005, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[2]  Rachel M. Adams,et al.  Systematic comparison of label-free, metabolic labeling, and isobaric chemical labeling for quantitative proteomics on LTQ Orbitrap Velos. , 2012, Journal of proteome research.

[3]  A. Furey,et al.  Ion suppression; a critical review on causes, evaluation, prevention and applications. , 2013, Talanta.

[4]  M. Mann,et al.  The coming age of complete, accurate, and ubiquitous proteomes. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[5]  John D. Storey,et al.  Statistical significance for genomewide studies , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Gary D Bader,et al.  A draft map of the human proteome , 2014, Nature.

[7]  Ludovic C. Gillet,et al.  Quantifying protein interaction dynamics by SWATH mass spectrometry: application to the 14-3-3 system , 2013, Nature Methods.

[8]  B. Kuster,et al.  Mass-spectrometry-based draft of the human proteome , 2014, Nature.

[9]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[10]  J. Ellenberg,et al.  The quantitative proteome of a human cell line , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[11]  Lukas N. Mueller,et al.  Full Dynamic Range Proteome Analysis of S. cerevisiae by Targeted Proteomics , 2009, Cell.

[12]  C. Enke,et al.  Practical implications of some recent studies in electrospray ionization fundamentals. , 2001, Mass spectrometry reviews.

[13]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  SnapShot: Mass Spectrometry for Protein and Proteome Analyses , 2013, Cell.

[14]  Ryszard Szplet Time-to-Digital Converters , 2014 .

[15]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Selected reaction monitoring–based proteomics: workflows, potential, pitfalls and future directions , 2012, Nature Methods.

[16]  J. Yates,et al.  Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[17]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Perspectives of targeted mass spectrometry for protein biomarker verification. , 2009, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[18]  Ludovic C. Gillet,et al.  Targeted Data Extraction of the MS/MS Spectra Generated by Data-independent Acquisition: A New Concept for Consistent and Accurate Proteome Analysis* , 2012, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[19]  Martin Kircher,et al.  Deep proteome and transcriptome mapping of a human cancer cell line , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[20]  J. Yates,et al.  Protein analysis by shotgun/bottom-up proteomics. , 2013, Chemical reviews.

[21]  Tony Pawson,et al.  Mapping differential interactomes by affinity purification coupled with data independent mass spectrometry acquisition , 2013, Nature Methods.

[22]  Christoph H Borchers,et al.  Multi-site assessment of the precision and reproducibility of multiple reaction monitoring–based measurements of proteins in plasma , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[23]  Brendan MacLean,et al.  Bioinformatics Applications Note Gene Expression Skyline: an Open Source Document Editor for Creating and Analyzing Targeted Proteomics Experiments , 2022 .

[24]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  Charge competition and the linear dynamic range of detection in electrospray ionization mass spectrometry , 2004, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[25]  Ludovic C. Gillet,et al.  Quantitative measurements of N‐linked glycoproteins in human plasma by SWATH‐MS , 2013, Proteomics.