Fitness of Wild and Selected Eastern Oyster (Crassostrea virginica) Larvae under Different Conditions

ABSTRACT The eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica, has been an important fishery species in the United States for hundreds of years. The emergence of population devastating diseases such as MSX and Dermo was met with the development of disease-resistant lines. Although selectively bred oysters have shown improved survival and growth under diseases in the field, it is unknown if long-term selection has altered larval fitness. In this study, the larval fitness of a selected line (DBX) was studied and compared with that of the Delaware Bay wild (Wild) population under hatchery and natural conditions with the latter using untreated seawater, 50% feeding, and declining salinity. No difference in growth was observed between DBX and Wild larvae under either condition, but DBX exhibited a higher survival under hatchery conditions (P = 0.090), whereas the Wild performed equally well under both conditions. Under natural conditions, the DBX larvae had higher survival during the first week when the salinity was high, but lower survival later under low salinity. The DBX larvae had a much higher setting success and a preference for oyster shells as substrate compared with the Wild larvae. Results of this study indicate that selective breeding has unintentionally altered larval fitness of DBX and led to adaptation to hatchery and high salinity conditions with greater setting success, and the Wild larvae have wider adaptability to different conditions. These findings suggest that careful evaluation is needed to fully assess the recruitment potential of selected stocks used in aquaculture and restoration.

[1]  L. Hillier,et al.  A second unveiling: haplotig masking of the eastern oyster genome improves population-level inference , 2023, bioRxiv.

[2]  Dan Zeng,et al.  Development and Evaluation of High-Density SNP Arrays for the Eastern Oyster Crassostrea virginica , 2023, Marine Biotechnology.

[3]  J. Báez,et al.  Comparing oyster population structure and disease prevalence between a disease‐resistant and transplanted wild population in Barnegat Bay, NJ (U.S.A.) , 2022, Restoration Ecology.

[4]  P. Kube,et al.  Genetic parameters for Crassostrea virginica and their application to family-based breeding in the mid-Atlantic, USA , 2021 .

[5]  Ximing Guo,et al.  Diversity and Evolution of Living Oysters , 2018, Journal of Shellfish Research.

[6]  Ximing Guo,et al.  Performance of selectively-bred lines of eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica, across eastern US estuaries , 2016 .

[7]  Qiang Wang,et al.  The oyster genome reveals stress adaptation and complexity of shell formation , 2012, Nature.

[8]  H. Lenihan,et al.  Oyster Reefs at Risk and Recommendations for Conservation, Restoration, and Management , 2011 .

[9]  R. Carnegie,et al.  Evaluating Recruitment Contribution of a Selectively Bred Aquaculture Line of the Oyster, Crassostrea virginica used in Restoration Efforts , 2008 .

[10]  Ximing Guo,et al.  Inbreeding depression for various traits in two cultured populations of the American bay scallop, Argopecten irradians irradians Lamarck (1819) introduced into China , 2008 .

[11]  H. Araki,et al.  Fitness of hatchery-reared salmonids in the wild , 2008, Evolutionary applications.

[12]  R. Carnegie,et al.  A genetic test for recruitment enhancement in Chesapeake Bay oysters, Crassostrea virginica, after population supplementation with a disease tolerant strain , 2006, Conservation Genetics.

[13]  Ziniu Yu,et al.  Genetic Analysis of Selected Strains of Eastern Oyster (Crassostrea virginica Gmelin) Using AFLP and Microsatellite Markers , 2004, Marine Biotechnology.

[14]  P. Gaffney,et al.  Mitochondrial DNA markers allow monitoring of oyster stock enhancement in the Chesapeake Bay , 2004 .

[15]  E. Burreson,et al.  Dual disease resistance in a selectively bred eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica, strain tested in Chesapeake Bay , 2003 .

[16]  D. Hedgecock,et al.  High genetic load in the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas. , 2001, Genetics.

[17]  E. Houde,et al.  Factors in the Decline of Coastal Ecosystems , 2001, Science.

[18]  K. Bjorndal,et al.  Historical Overfishing and the Recent Collapse of Coastal Ecosystems , 2001, Science.

[19]  F. Bonhomme,et al.  Early effect of inbreeding as revealed by microsatellite analyses on Ostrea edulis larvae. , 1998, Genetics.

[20]  B. Bayne,et al.  Hybrid vigor in Pacific oysters: an experimental approach using crosses among inbred lines , 1995 .

[21]  A. Ibarra,et al.  Effects of inbreeding on growth and survival of self-fertilized catarina scallop larvae, Argopecten circularis , 1995 .

[22]  R. Weiner,et al.  Chemical production of cultchless oyster spat using epinephrine and norepinephrine , 1986 .

[23]  P. Boudry,et al.  Evidence of response to unintentional selection for faster development and inbreeding depression in Crassostrea gigas larvae , 2007 .

[24]  P. Goulletquer,et al.  Decline of the Chesapeake Bay oyster population: a century of habitat destruction and overfishing , 1991 .