Inventors, Copycats, and Everyone Else: The Emergence of Shared Resources and Practices As Defining Aspects of Classroom Communities.

To evaluate the usefulness of the notion of community of practice in classroom settings, I conducted an ethnography of an emerging culture. In this exploratory study, I was particularly interested in finding student descriptions that allow researchers to recognize classroom communities. Based on the detailed analysis of videotaped student-student interactions and ethnographic observations in a grade 4/5 classroom studying a unit on civil engineering, this article documents how the collectively available knowledge of a classroom community was transformed as resources and practices were adopted by more and more members. Students' disputes about who had come up with an idea first and students' admission to do something “because everyone else is doing it” both signaled the presence of a shared resource or practice. Many resources were readily adopted in a student-centered process. The adoption of engineering discourse practices, on the other hand, were teacher-centered and associated with considerable effort. Implications are drawn for the organization of classroom environments that encourage the emergence of shared resources and practices. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[1]  Bruce Gregory,et al.  Inventing Reality: Physics as Language , 1988 .

[2]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  An Investigation of Problem Framing and Solving in a Grade 8 Open-Inquiry Science Program , 1994 .

[3]  K. McCain Communication, Competition, and Secrecy: The Production and Dissemination of Research-Related Information in Genetics , 1991 .

[4]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[5]  P. Hewson,et al.  Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change , 1982 .

[6]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Knowing and Interacting: A Study of Culture, Practices, and Resources in a Grade 8 Open-Inquiry Science Classroom Guided by a Cognitive Apprenticeship Metaphor , 1995 .

[7]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Teacher questioning in an open‐inquiry learning environment: Interactions of context, content, and student responses , 1996 .

[8]  Eric Livingston,et al.  Making Sense of Ethnomethodology , 1987 .

[9]  J. Lave Cognition in Practice: Outdoors: a social anthropology of cognition in practice , 1988 .

[10]  Denis Newman,et al.  The Construction Zone: Working for Cognitive Change in School , 1989 .

[11]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[12]  L. Suchman,et al.  Understanding practice: Artificial intelligence as craftwork , 1993 .

[13]  J. Lave Understanding practice: The practice of learning , 1993 .

[14]  Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al.  The concept map as a tool for the collaborative construction of knowledge: A microanalysis of high school physics students , 1993 .

[15]  Wolff-Michael Rolf Knowledge Diffusion in a Grade 4-5 Classroom during a Unit on Civil Engineering: An Analysis of a Classroom Community in Terms of Its Changing Resources and Practices. , 1996 .

[16]  Naoki Ueno,et al.  Reconsidering P-Prims Theory From the Viewpoint of Situated Cognition , 1993 .

[17]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Affordances of computers in teacher‐student interactions: The case of interactive physics™ , 1995 .

[18]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities , 1994 .

[19]  Harold Garfinkel,et al.  Ethnomethodology and the human sciences: Respecification: evidence for locally produced, naturally accountable phenomena of order, logic, reason, meaning, method, etc. in and as of the essential haecceity of immortal ordinary society (I) – an announcement of studies , 1991 .