The structure of risk adjustment for private plans in Medicare.

Medicare bases its risk adjustment method for Medicare Advantage plan payment on the relative costs of treating various diagnoses in traditional Medicare. However, there are many reasons to doubt that the relative cost of treating different diagnoses is similar between Medicare Advantage plans and traditional Medicare, including the varying applicability of care management methods to different diagnoses and the varying degrees of market power among suppliers of services to plans. We use internal cost data from a large health plan to compare its cost of treating various diagnoses with Medicare's reimbursement. We find substantial variability across diagnoses, implying that the current risk adjustment system creates incentives for Medicare Advantage plans to favor beneficiaries with certain diagnoses, but find no consistent relationship between the costliness of the diagnosis and the difference between reimbursement and cost.

[1]  D. Wennberg,et al.  A randomized trial of a telephone care-management strategy. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  Julie Bynum,et al.  Regional variations in diagnostic practices. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets : An Essay on the Economics of Imperfect Information , 2007 .

[4]  T. Mcguire,et al.  Predictability and predictiveness in health care spending. , 2007, Journal of health economics.

[5]  E. Fisher,et al.  Use of Medicare claims data to monitor provider-specific performance among patients with severe chronic illness. , 2004, Health affairs.

[6]  Lisa I. Iezzoni,et al.  Risk Adjustment of Medicare Capitation Payments Using the CMS-HCC Model , 2004, Health care financing review.

[7]  David Wennberg,et al.  The Implications of Regional Variations in Medicare Spending. Part 1: The Content, Quality, and Accessibility of Care , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[8]  David Wennberg,et al.  The Implications of Regional Variations in Medicare Spending. Part 2: Health Outcomes and Satisfaction with Care , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[9]  C. Phelps INFORMATION DIFFUSION AND BEST PRACTICE ADOPTION , 2000 .

[10]  David W. Bates,et al.  Principal Inpatient Diagnostic Cost Group Model for Medicare Risk Adjustment , 2000, Health care financing review.

[11]  Russell S. Kirby,et al.  The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care , 1998 .

[12]  S. Retchin,et al.  Do Health Maintenance Organizations Work for Medicare? , 1993, Health care financing review.

[13]  Clifford Goodman,et al.  Physician Payment Review Commission , 1988 .

[14]  W. Manning,et al.  A controlled trial of the effect of a prepaid group practice on use of services. , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  P. Clifford,et al.  Small-area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of New England, England, and Norway. , 1982, The New England journal of medicine.