Transfer of specific unresponsiveness to organ allografts by thymocytes. Specific unresponsiveness by thymocyte transfer

Prolonged survival of vascularized organ allografts has been produced in unmodified inbred rats by transfer of thymocytes from enhanced, engrafted, syngeneic animals. For these thymocytes to increase significantly the survival of test allografts they must be harvested 6- 9 d after transplantation. Thymectomy of the enhanced, engrafted animals during the same critical period causes acute rejection of othewise long surviving grafts. For optimal effect, the enhanced thymocyte donor must be actively and passively immunized and receive a cardiac allograft. The necessity for erythrocytes in the initial active immunization regimen is noted. Additionally, the antigenic specificity of the suppressor effect has been established with two histoincompatible donor rat strains. Cellular and humoral host responses mounted by test graft recipients after thymocyte transfer from enhanced, engrafted donors are different from those mounted either by unmodifed animals acutely rejecting their grafts or by enhanced rats bearing well-functioning grafts. Numbers of T lymphocytes are reduced in the grafted hearts and in the spleens of test graft recipients, a finding paralleled by the complete absence of specific direct lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity. In contrast, cytotoxic antibody production, although delayed, is increased in magnitude, peaking around the time of graft rejection. These studies provide evidence that different biological manipulations can modify separate pathways in the complex cellular and humoral responses towards organ allografts. They demonstrate that cellular immunity is critically involved in immunological enhancement of vascularized organ allografts, a phenomenon hitherto considered primarily humoral. It seems clear that cells with suppressor activity are present within the thymus during the early phases of immunological enhancement.

[1]  T. Strom,et al.  Prolongation of organ allograft survival by syngeneic lymphoid cells. , 1978, Journal of immunology.

[2]  W. Baldwin,et al.  ENHANCED ALLOGRAFT SURVIVAL BY COMBINED ACTIVE AND PASSIVE IMMUNIZATION: REQUIREMENT OF BOTH ERYTHROCYTES AND LEUKOCYTES , 1978, Transplantation.

[3]  J. Bancewicz,et al.  ENHANCEMENT OF CARDIAC ALLOGRAFTS IN RATS: COMPARISON OF HOST RESPONSES TO DIFFERENT TREATMENT PROTOCOLS , 1978, Transplantation.

[4]  J. R. Batchelor,et al.  Absence of suppressor cells from rats bearing passively enhanced kidney allografts , 1977, Nature.

[5]  T. Strom,et al.  Cellular components of allograft rejection: identity, specificity, and cytotoxic function of cells infiltrating acutely rejecting allografts. , 1977, Journal of immunology.

[6]  S. Dorsch,et al.  Recirculating, suppressor T cells in transplantation tolerance , 1977, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[7]  T. Strom,et al.  Identification, cytotoxicity, and suppressor activity of infiltrating cells from enhanced organ allografts. , 1977, Transplantation proceedings.

[8]  P. Kilshaw,et al.  Further studies on suppressor T cells in mice unresponsive to H-2-incompatible skin grafts. , 1977, Transplantation proceedings.

[9]  D. Scollard,et al.  CELLULAR AND HUMORAL IMMUNITY AFTER ALLOGENEIC RENAL TRANSPLANTATION IN THE RAT: V. Appearance of Anti‐Idiotypic Antibody and its Relationship to Cellular Immunity after Treatment with Donor Spleen Cells and Alloantibody , 1976, Transplantation.

[10]  M. Greene,et al.  Regulation of the immune response to tumor antigens. II. The nature of immunosuppressor cells in tumor-bearing hosts. , 1976, Journal of immunology.

[11]  T. Strom,et al.  The role of nonclassical Fc receptor-associated, Ag-B antigens (Ia) in rat allograft enhancement , 1976, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[12]  T. Strom,et al.  Studies on infiltrating host cells harvested from acutely rejecting rat cardiac allografts. , 1976, Surgery.

[13]  T. Strom,et al.  MODIFICATION OF THE RAT ALLOIMMUNE RESPONSE BY ENHANCING ANTIBODIES AND THE ROLE OF BLOCKING FACTORS IN THE SURVIVAL OF RENAL GRAFTS , 1975, Transplantation.

[14]  T. Strom,et al.  SURFACE PROPERTIES AND FUNCTIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF INFILTRATING CELLS HARVESTED FROM ACUTELY REJECTING CARDIAC ALLOGRAFTS IN INBRED RATS , 1975, Transplantation.

[15]  R. Rich,et al.  Regulatory mechanisms in cell-mediated immune responses. IV. Expression of a receptor for mixed lymphocyte reaction suppressor factor on activated T lymphocytes , 1976, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[16]  G. Asherson,et al.  Suppression of contact sensitivity by T cells in the mouse. I. Demonstration that suppressor cells act on the effector stage of contact sensitivity; and their induction following in vitro exposure to antigen , 1974, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[17]  H. Claman,et al.  Tolerance and contact sensitivity to DNFB in mice. 3. Transfer of tolerance with "suppressor T cells". , 1974, Journal of immunology.

[18]  E. Golub,et al.  The distribution of brain-associated theta antigen cross-reactive with mouse in the brain of other species. , 1972, Journal of immunology.

[19]  W. Elkins Cellular control of lymphocytes initiating graft vs. host reactions. , 1972, Cellular immunology.

[20]  M. Mokyr,et al.  Specific inhibition of receptors for cytophilic antibody on macrophages by isoantibody. , 1972, Cancer research.

[21]  G. Asherson,et al.  The mechanism of immunological unresponsiveness to picryl chloride and the possible role of antibody mediated depression. , 1971, Clinical and experimental immunology.

[22]  T. Tada,et al.  Regulation of homocytotropic antibody formation in the rat. 3. Effect of thymectomy and splenectomy. , 1971, Journal of immunology.

[23]  P. Baker,et al.  Evidence for the existence of two functionally distinct types of cells which regulate the antibody response to type 3 pneumococcal polysaccharide. , 1970, Journal of immunology.

[24]  R. Gershon,et al.  Cell interactions in the induction of tolerance: the role of thymic lymphocytes. , 1970, Immunology.

[25]  M. Raff,et al.  Immunoglobulin Determinants on the Surface of Mouse Lymphoid Cells , 1970, Nature.

[26]  B. Heslop,et al.  Immunological enhancement of rat kidney grafts. , 1969, Lancet.

[27]  W. Boyle AN EXTENSION OF THE51Cr-RELEASE ASSAY FOR THE ESTIMATION OF MOUSE CYTOTOXINS , 1968, Transplantation.

[28]  F. Fitch,et al.  Rejection of Renal Allografts: Specific Immunologic Suppression , 1968, Science.

[29]  B. Chapuis,et al.  Quantitative assay of the lytic action of immune lymphoid cells on 51-Cr-labelled allogeneic target cells in vitro; inhibition by isoantibody and by drugs. , 1968, Immunology.

[30]  N. Kaliss Immunological enhancement of tumor homografts in mice: a review. , 1958, Cancer research.

[31]  A. Abbas,et al.  The role of antibodies in the rejection and enhancement of organ allografts.?7318. , 1976, Advances in immunology.

[32]  A. J. Crowle,et al.  Adoptive transfer of neonatal tolerance into normal mice. Abstr. , 1971 .