Governing Networks in the Hollow State: Contracting out, process management or a combination of the two?

The hollow state is characterized by governing through networks. In this article, we explore the nature of the hollow state and trace and illustrate three basic uncertainties in the decision-making process which create complexity: knowledge uncertainty, institutional uncertainty and strategic uncertainty. Next, we elaborate the main characteristics of contracting out and address the issue of whether these fit the nature of the hollow state. Finally, we ask if the role of politicians should change given the characteristics of the hollow state. We conclude with some thoughts on effective management in the hollow state and the role of process management and contracting out.

[1]  O. Williamson,et al.  The mechanisms of governance , 1996 .

[2]  Keith G. Provan,et al.  Governing the Hollow State , 2000 .

[3]  D. Marsh,et al.  Policy networks in British government , 1992 .

[4]  G. Vinten.  Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis , 2000 .

[5]  David Knoke,et al.  The Organizational State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains , 1987 .

[6]  M. Dibner,et al.  International Strategic Alliances , 1992, Bio/Technology.

[7]  W. Galston.  Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity , 1996 .

[8]  C. Oliver,et al.  Organizations Working Together , 1992 .

[9]  Janet A. Weiss.  Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector / From Red Tape to Results: Creating a Government that Works Better and Costs Less , 1995 .

[10]  Jonathan Michie,et al.  Contracts, co-operation, and competition : studies in economics, management, and law , 1997 .

[11]  F. Scharpf.  Games Real Actors Play: Actor-centered Institutionalism In Policy Research , 1997 .

[12]  V. Shaw,et al.  International Strategic Alliances , 2004 .

[13]  Agency Fever? Analysis of an International Policy Fashion , 2001 .

[14]  C. Lane,et al.  Trust within and between organizations : conceptual issues and empirical applications , 2000 .

[15]  Erik-Hans Klijn,et al.  Politicians and Interactive Decision Making: Institutional Spoilsports or Playmakers , 2000 .

[16]  Håkan Håkansson,et al.  The Network as a Governance Structure: Interfirm Cooperation Beyond Markets and Hierarchies , 1993 .

[17]  David Marsh,et al.  Comparing policy networks , 1998 .

[18]  S. Osborne.  Public-Private Partnerships: Theory and Practice in International Perspective , 2000 .

[19]  Chris Skelcher,et al.  The Dynamics of Multi‐organizational Partnerships: an Analysis of Changing Modes of Governance , 1998 .

[20]  Frank Wilkinson,et al.  Trust within and between Organizations. Conceptual Issues and Empirical Applications , 2001 .

[21]  David Dery,et al.  Problem Definition in Policy Analysis , 1984 .

[22]  J. Dryzek.  The Politics of the Earth , 2021 .

[23]  David Parker,et al.  The economics of partnership sourcing versus adversarial competition: a critique , 1997 .

[24]  E. Clarence,et al.  New Labour and Inter-Governmental Management: Flexible networks or performance control? , 2000 .

[25]  Tânia Margarete Mezzomo Keinert,et al.  Reinventing government: how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector , 1993 .

[26]  J. F. M. Koppenjan,et al.  Public Management and Policy Networks , 2000 .

[27]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Organizations: New Concepts for New Forms , 1986 .

[28]  K. Termeer,et al.  MANAGING NETWORKS IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: A THEORETICAL STUDY OF MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES IN POLICY NETWORKS , 1995 .