Developing attributes and attribute-levels for a discrete choice experiment on micro health insurance in rural Malawi

BackgroundDiscrete choice experiments (DCEs) are attribute-driven experimental techniques used to elicit stakeholders’ preferences to support the design and implementation of policy interventions. The validity of a DCE, therefore, depends on the appropriate specification of the attributes and their levels. There have been recent calls for greater rigor in implementing and reporting on the processes of developing attributes and attribute-levels for discrete choice experiments (DCEs). This paper responds to such calls by carefully reporting a systematic process of developing micro health insurance attributes and attribute-levels for the design of a DCE in rural Malawi.MethodsConceptual attributes and attribute-levels were initially derived from a literature review which informed the design of qualitative data collection tools to identify context specific attributes and attribute-levels. Qualitative data was collected in August-September 2012 from 12 focus group discussions with community residents and 8 in-depth interviews with health workers. All participants were selected according to stratified purposive sampling. The material was tape-recorded, fully transcribed, and coded by three researchers to identify context-specific attributes and attribute-levels. Expert opinion was used to scale down the attributes and levels. A pilot study confirmed the appropriateness of the selected attributes and levels for a DCE.ResultsFirst, a consensus, emerging from an individual level analysis of the qualitative transcripts, identified 10 candidate attributes. Levels were assigned to all attributes based on data from transcripts and knowledge of the Malawian context, derived from literature. Second, through further discussions with experts, four attributes were discarded based on multiple criteria. The 6 remaining attributes were: premium level, unit of enrollment, management structure, health service benefit package, transportation coverage and copayment levels. A final step of revision and piloting confirmed that the retained attributes satisfied the credibility criteria of DCE attributes.ConclusionThis detailed description makes our attribute development process transparent, and provides the reader with a basis to assess the rigor of this stage of constructing the DCE. This paper contributes empirical evidence to the limited methodological literature on attributes and levels development for DCE, thereby providing further empirical guidance on the matter, specifically within rural communities of low- and middle-income countries.

[1]  B. Criel,et al.  Editorial: Community health insurance (CHI) in sub‐Saharan Africa: researching the context , 2004, Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH.

[2]  J. Twikirize,et al.  Why Ugandan rural households are opting to pay community health insurance rather than use the free healthcare services , 2012 .

[3]  J. Kutzin,et al.  A descriptive framework for country-level analysis of health care financing arrangements. , 2001, Health policy.

[4]  S. Berki,et al.  HMO enrollment: who joins what and why: a review of the literature. , 1980, The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society.

[5]  R. Sauerborn,et al.  Understanding enrolment in community health insurance in sub-Saharan Africa: a population-based case-control study in rural Burkina Faso. , 2006, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[6]  Trine Kjær,et al.  A review of the discrete choice experiment - with emphasis on its application in health care , 2005 .

[7]  R. Baltussen,et al.  Household perceptions and their implications for enrollment in the National Health Insurance Scheme in Ghana. , 2012, Health policy and planning.

[8]  Julie Riise Kolstad,et al.  How to conduct a discrete choice experiment for health workforce recruitment and retention in remote and rural areas : a user guide with case studies , 2012 .

[9]  Akaah Ip,et al.  Integrating a consumer orientation into the planning of HMO programs: an application of conjoint segmentation. , 1983 .

[10]  M. Patton Qualitative research & evaluation methods , 2002 .

[11]  Karin Braunsberger,et al.  Modeling Consumer Health Plan Choice Behavior To Improve Customer Value and Health Plan Market Share , 2000 .

[12]  John M. Rose,et al.  Applied Choice Analysis: List of tables , 2005 .

[13]  B. V. Rijsbergen,et al.  Delivery Care in Tanzania: A Comparative Analysis of Use and Preferences , 2013 .

[14]  A. Royalty,et al.  Economic Research Initiative on the Uninsured Working Paper Series THE EFFECT OF PREMIUMS ON THE DECISION TO PARTICIPATE IN HEALTH INSURANCE AND OTHER FRINGE BENEFITS OFFERED BY THE EMPLOYER : EVIDENCE FROM A REAL-WORLD EXPERIMENT , 2003 .

[15]  Gregory S Wellman,et al.  Pilot study of a hierarchical Bayes method for utility estimation in a choice-based conjoint analysis of prescription benefit plans including medication therapy management services. , 2008, Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP.

[16]  M. Kruk,et al.  Rural practice preferences among medical students in Ghana: a discrete choice experiment. , 2010, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[17]  Margaret E Kruk,et al.  Preferences for working in rural clinics among trainee health professionals in Uganda: a discrete choice experiment , 2012, BMC Health Services Research.

[18]  K. Hanson,et al.  Employment preferences of public sector nurses in Malawi: results from a discrete choice experiment , 2008, Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH.

[19]  John M. Rose,et al.  Applied Choice Analysis: List of tables , 2005 .

[20]  M. De Allegri,et al.  Gaps in universal health coverage in Malawi: A qualitative study in rural communities , 2014, BMC Health Services Research.

[21]  B. Criel,et al.  Declining subscriptions to the Maliando Mutual Health Organisation in Guinea-Conakry (West Africa): what is going wrong? , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[22]  B. Criel,et al.  What are the emerging features of community health insurance schemes in East Africa? , 2009, Risk management and healthcare policy.

[23]  Deborah Marshall,et al.  Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force. , 2013, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[24]  D. Kirigia,et al.  Community perceptions of health insurance and their preferred design features: implications for the design of universal health coverage reforms in Kenya , 2013, BMC Health Services Research.

[25]  B. McPake,et al.  Preferences for hospital quality in Zambia: results from a discrete choice experiment. , 2005, Health economics.

[26]  R. Sauerborn,et al.  Community health insurance in sub‐Saharan Africa: what operational difficulties hamper its successful development? , 2009, Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH.

[27]  John M. Rose,et al.  Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer , 2005 .

[28]  H. Kunreuther,et al.  Health insurance under competition: would people choose what is expected? , 1984, Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing.

[29]  Mandy Ryan,et al.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. , 2012, Health economics.

[30]  M. Lagarde,et al.  A review of the application and contribution of discrete choice experiments to inform human resources policy interventions , 2009, Human resources for health.

[31]  D. Chambers,et al.  Exploring the feasibility of Conjoint Analysis as a tool for prioritizing innovations for implementation , 2013, Implementation Science.

[32]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Design of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Discussion of Issues That Matter in Future Applied Research , 2011 .

[33]  Eyob Zere,et al.  Health financing in Malawi: Evidence from National Health Accounts , 2010, BMC international health and human rights.

[34]  O. Onwujekwe,et al.  Preferences for benefit packages for community-based health insurance: an exploratory study in Nigeria , 2010, BMC health services research.

[35]  Elly Stolk,et al.  Towards a multi-criteria approach for priority setting: an application to Ghana. , 2006, Health economics.

[36]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[37]  Barbara McPake,et al.  How to do (or not to do) ... Designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low-income country. , 2009, Health policy and planning.

[38]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[39]  M. Kruk,et al.  Population preferences for health care in liberia: insights for rebuilding a health system. , 2011, Health services research.

[40]  Joanna Coast,et al.  Developing attributes and levels for discrete choice experiments using qualitative methods , 2007, Journal of health services research & policy.

[41]  M. Ryan,et al.  Valuing health care using willingness to pay: a comparison of the payment card and dichotomous choice methods. , 2004, Journal of health economics.

[42]  J. Louviere,et al.  Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.

[43]  C. Seghieri,et al.  The application of discrete choice experiments in health economics: a systematic review of the literature , 2013 .

[44]  Andrew Lloyd,et al.  Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. , 2011, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[45]  Trudy van der Weijden,et al.  Nominal group technique to select attributes for discrete choice experiments: an example for drug treatment choice in osteoporosis , 2013, Patient preference and adherence.

[46]  P. Zweifel,et al.  Preferences for health insurance and health status: does it matter whether you are Dutch or German? , 2011, The European Journal of Health Economics.

[47]  P. Zweifel,et al.  Age and Choice in Health Insurance , 2008 .

[48]  Joanna Coast,et al.  Using qualitative methods for attribute development for discrete choice experiments: issues and recommendations. , 2012, Health economics.

[49]  F. Schut,et al.  Preferences and choices for care and health insurance. , 2008, Social science & medicine.

[50]  ศิวะพร ภู่พันธ์,et al.  DESIGNING AND CONDUCTING MIXED METHODS RESEARCH (2nd Edition) , 2015 .

[51]  F. Diop,et al.  Impact of mutual health organizations: evidence from West Africa , 2008, Health policy and planning.

[52]  G Chakraborty,et al.  How consumers choose health insurance. , 1994, Journal of health care marketing.

[53]  S. Galea,et al.  Women's preferences for obstetric care in rural Ethiopia: a population-based discrete choice experiment in a region with low rates of facility delivery , 2009, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[54]  M. Young,et al.  Health services research , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[55]  M. English,et al.  Policy interventions that attract nurses to rural areas: a multicountry discrete choice experiment. , 2010, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[56]  Rainer Sauerborn,et al.  Understanding consumers' preferences and decision to enrol in community-based health insurance in rural West Africa. , 2006, Health policy.

[57]  Trudy van der Weijden,et al.  Investigating the complementary value of discrete choice experiments for the evaluation of barriers and facilitators in implementation research: a questionnaire survey , 2009, Implementation science : IS.